Tuesday, October 30, 2012

POLICE ENTRAPEMENT: THE DANGER POSED TO ACTIVISTS.

I once wrote an article entitled "Confronting State Terror", which was about the actions of the Canadian government, in its persecution, of both individuals, as well as groups of people.  I even handed a copy of that article to a Canadian government intelligence officer, one time, who was also quizzing me, on something else, unrelated to that topic.  I think she visibly gulped when I handed it to her. It was plain what my view were on some issues and I didn't see no point in hiding them.  Being outspoken also comes with a cost. It means living a life, under daily surveillance and being subjected to entrapment by the police and the government. And all for what? People who are less outspoken than me, may get around that, but I truly believe, that Canada, has become a police state. And also using the methods of a totalitarian and autocratic government.  I also resent being put into a situation by the police where my safety and freedom are also endangered, by the actions of the police and the government, working together to silence me. Each time I am also reminded that this is also based on who I am. A member of a visible minority, living in a country, that also does not recognized such a person, as a being legitimate member of this society. The human rights abuse component, of this issue, has also compounded the problem for me, as well.
Police entrapment should be regarded as a crime in and of itself, by the police and by those who has used this method to ensnare others. The police has used entrapment and often with the aid of agent provocateurs, in their service, to try and ensare ordinary citizens, into committing crimes, that they normally would not have committed, under those circumstances.  The police targerts are also sometimes not the usual criminals, who are also inclined to commit those actions anyway, but usually those who has come under radar, of either the police, or the government and who the police has also accused of carrying out subversive actions, against the government, that they also feel by their actions, are also made justifiable, in trying to get those persons to commit a crime, through deception and other means.
This is a reality that I have also lived with from the Toronto police and also the government of Canada.
If you've read some of my most recent articles, you will also see why, when those who I also believed are agent provocateurs of the police, are also given unusual protection by them and to also continue to act for them with immunity. Where I am living right now there are two such persons, that I also believed are agents of the police and of the Canadian government, against me, whose role is to create situations that would cause me to commit a crime. What is also schocking about those persons as well, is the fact that they are also in other ways, believed to have committed other crimes. For instance, by being illegally in Canada, or has committed a criminal offence while living in Canada, without having any official legal status. The Hugues Idholo case, is also one example of this. The other case, involving the woman, Yu Xia Li, who is also believed to be, allegedly, living in Canada illegally, is another.  In the Hugues Idholo case, with no evidence of having any legal status, whatsoever, except maybe those that would apply to a conventional refugee applicant in this case, which is also limited, there are still no proof that he is either a conventional refugee, a landed immigrant, or Canadian citizen. And with the other person, Yu Xia Li, there is no evidence, whatsoever, of her having any kind of legal status, including, those under the refugee protection provisions of the law.  This should show the depth of the problem with the police and other government authorities, regarding those persons and others like them, that they have also commissioned, to act for them, to "take down" their select targets.

When entrapment by the police is proven in a court of law, it is also the basis for the acquittal of the case. The fact that the police will not take any actions against those persons and where evidence has also shown them to have broken the law, otherwise, is a clear case of the police working clandestinely with them also.  Some of the things that they have done are also very subtle and one has to really study their actions, to see the motives behind some of their actions and also the police involvement with them behind the scene. But there is also more regarding those actions. The police I believed has helped to cover up other investigations against them. Some of which I have also disclosed here on my blog.

For example, going out of their way, to try and cause the person to act, or to react to some of their actions. All of which are in themselves criminal and for which they could also be charged. The police chose to regard it as a dispute between the parties. The difference in this case, is where one of the party, is also believed to be an unwilling participant, to all of this and would also preferred, to be left alone, or out of it entirely. This tactic of entrapment by the police, also has a psycological aspect to it. And the police intention is to continue to "apply pressure" until the target eitther snaps, or do something, that would also make them fall into their hands. In which case they would have also accomplished their purpose.  
So I have decided to turn the tables on them. I decided that the law is on my side at this time and not theirs and that I will also use this against them, should I be cognizant of any actions of theirs, that I believed, is either criminal, or that should also be investigated, and which is also not being done at this time and that will also be done, in the interest of the public, and despite the police actions to protect those persons.  Therefore attempts by them, and others to entrap me, will also be reversed, where it is I who will be laying the charges, for any infringement of my rights, by them, either through the criminal code, or by other means available to me, under the law. Where they want me to act aggressive, I will act assertive and I will indeed, ascertain my legal rights here, against them. I will not fall victim to this kind of abuse by the police. I am fairly educated enough and also know the law well enough, to know that I also do not have to go along with their ploy, like a sheep to the slaughter.  It is a form of human rights abuse, because it also prevents the person from being able to live a normal life, or to have the enjoyments of such a life.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

911 TAPE TO BE EDITED BY THE POLICE. THE ACCUSED DEATH THREATS, TO THE VICTIM, CONCERNING HER ANIMAL, TO BE EDITED, OUT OF THE 911 TAPE, ACCORDING TO THE POLICE.

The Police's  claim, To Removed, A Crucial Piece Of Evidence, From The 911 Tape,  Is Also To Be Appealed.

TORONTO POLICE ACCESS AND PRIVACY: "We Cannot Release The Tape 911 Tape, With The Accused Comments, It Will Be Edited Out, To Protect His Privacy"

WHAT ABOUT PROTECTING THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC?

If the public is wondering, why, the 911 tape of the victim's call, to the police, on July 9, 2012
which also included the accused comments, as well, specifically, his threats to kill, or to injure someone, or an animal. The police has decided to edit that portion out of the 911 tape.

They have the nerve to tell the victim, that, she also needed the accused written permission, to have his comments, of his death threats to the victim, included in the 911 tape, otherwise it will be edited out. "To protect his privacy"!  This, according to the manager, of the access and  privacy department, Katie Watts, on October 24th, at the Toronto Police headquarters, and also to the victim in this case, Valerie Guillaume, who had requested the 911 tape.  Releasing the 911 tape of Hugues Idholo's statements, of his death threats, would also be a violation of his privacy, the police is claiming.  Is it just me, that thinks that there is something wrong here? regarding the police's statement?

The key to getting a conviction, against the man, Hugues Idholo, was also the self incrininating statements, that he also made, that was caught on the 911 tape, during the victim's call to the police. If the police edits it out, as they say, that they will also do, in order to protect his privacy, then that evidence is also lost.  The victim was also told by the Access and Privacy Commission, that, should the police, not provide the full 911 tape, their decision, to edit the tape, can also be appealed.

But the public is left wondering why the police would also make such a decision in the first place?. If someone is caught in the very act of committing a crime, such as making a death threat, does the police then have the right, to remove that evidence, if it was caught on a tape, as was the case with the Hugues Idholo case?.  Isn't that's what is also needed for a conviction? The accused own self incriminating statements?  Doesn't the police have a responsibility, also, to protect the interest of the public and not the person, who has committed the crime, in this case?

There is also no copy of the 911 tape of the accused comments, with the court either. The police claim that they had also provided, a copy of the 911 tape, to the court and this is also not true, since there is no copy of such a tape in any of the court's record office. The exhibit office, of the court, for instance, has no copy of the 911 tape, and has never recieved any according to them, from the crown attorney's office. The 911 tape would have also been a crucial piece of evidence against the accused, at a trial. Both the crown attorney's office and also the police has kept this piece of evidence, from the court.

Accordingly, both the police's disclosure and also the crown's brief, if you can also believe this lie, about the crown attorney's personal notes, being given directly to the police, in regards to the case, that were also sent back to the police and the police is now saying, that, they can only release, an edited version, of the 911 tape, that would also not include, the accused own comments, that was also caught on the 911 tape. The self incriminating statements, of his death threats, to kill the animal of the victim. And to also attempt to get away with his actions. Both the police and the crown attorney's office, also made sure of that, after withdrawing the charge, against the accused, Hugues Idholo. The victim also received, no apology, contrary to what the police has also claimed, to be a part of the condition, of withdrawing the charge and for him to also attend anger management. Neither of which he has also apparently done, in this case.

The man is apparently also trying to achieved some kind of status, in Canada, despite his violent nature. A condition which would also disqualify him from remaining in Canada. Obtaining landed immigrant status in Canada, is also somewhat of a long process, which is intented, to exposed those who may also break the law, during that time. There is no more convinving evidence against him, than his own violent actions in this case, regarding his death threats to the victim, to kill her animal and where he has also shown no remorse, whatsoever, for doing so.  And which the police is also trying to cover up, or to prevent, from hindering this process. There is also his other actions, of using different identities, to suit whatever other purpose he also wants to achieve, at that moment and with the police also going along with it, even to the point of trying to decieved the court, regarding that, directly. But what about the victim in this case and also the police legal obligation to uphold the law?

The police is also trying to make a mockery, of justice in this case and there is also no other recourse, left to the victim, but to appeal the police's decision, to edit the 911 tape, containing the evidence against the accused. And also to put public pressure on the police, to release the full tape, of both the victim and the accused statements, in this case.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

THE TORONTO POLICE, ARE ACCUSED, OF WORKING WITH ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS , WHO ALSO ACT AS AGENT PROVOCATEURS.

Woman, believed to be Yu Xia Li and also illegally in Canada. She is also accused, of endangering, the safety of the public.

LANDLORD IS ACCUSED OF ALLOWING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO OCCUPY PREMESIS.

Li Yong Yu, is the owner of the property located at 87 Argyle street, in Toronto and she is also being accused, of harbouring people, who are also believed to be illegally in the country, including, members of her own family, on the property.

She is also being investigated, by the city of Toronto, for other violations, including for possibly breaching the zoning by law, and other infractions, regarding the building.

The Toronto police, 14 division, has been accused of working with those same people, it is also believed, who they also know to be illegally, in the country and has also been using them, to act as agent provocateurs.  This is the shocking revelation that is now coming to forth, after the police also refused to act, upon information, to investigate those same persons, after they were also being investigated, for endangering the safety of others, while already breaking the law, for allegedly, being here illegally.

The two persons at the center of the controversey, are Hugues Idholo Yala, who is also believed to be applying for refugee status and after he was also charged with a violent offence!, while in Canada.  The second person, also at the center of this story, is a woman that is also believed, to go by the name of Yu Xia Li, the sister of the owner of the building.  She currently lives at 87 Argyle street, in Toronto and she is also believed to be illegally in the country and that this is also known to the police, the Toronto 14 division police to be exact, but that they have also not acted upon it, though they have been known to attend the property, many times, to investigate their actions, including within the last week, when they were both accused, of causing a fire hazard, by putting oil on the stove, deliberately and for which the fire department, is also investigating.  That was what got them into trouble, recently. And if it was also left up to the police, they would also cover it up entirely. 

It is bad enough that there are allegations, against them for being in Canada illegally, but endangering the safety of the public, at the same time, is also what has caused me, to regard this matter, as being of public concern and to also make this information public. By making those allegations about them public, I  hope to force the Canadian authorities, to act to protect the safety of the public. It is another blow to the corruption, that might also be underneath it all and why they don't want to act, in this case. 


A View of the Canadian System.
Canada Deports Those Who Saves Lives and Keep Those Who Endanger It.

On the other hand, another person, who has claimed to help the police to solve many unsolved murder cases and to help put those murderers behind bars, was also recently deported from Canada.  She has called herself the 'snitch lady' and has personally claimed to help put at least 13 persons, in prison, for committing murders, as well as other serious crimes.  Kemi Omolulu Olunloyo, was deported back to Nigeria, after her refugee application was denied, by the Immigration and Refugee Board.  Some people, like me, also believed, that, she was deported to save  her own life, maybe?. Since putting murderers behind bar, is also a highly dangerous job.  Kemi Omolulu Olunloyo, has also actually said that much, too, when she described her departure, as being a "covert operation" and "that she was given the VIP treatment". Still, Canada acted treaterously, by deporting, someone who actually made society safer, albeit, acting stupidly herself.
It is a tactic that it has used many times.  I once know a woman who was deported back to Central America, after cooperating with CSIS and the police here, and who also ratted out on some drug dealers, back in her own country, in retrurn for having status in Canada. She was later deported back to the very same country, to face those persons, she had betrayed to the Canadian authorities.  That is how the Canadian government operate. I feel sorry for none of them, with the exception, of one of those cases. The Omar Khadar case. After obtaining, whatever information, that it could, from the boy, Omar Khadar, CSIS then turn around and handed him over to the United States government, where he was later tortured some more and detained. 

Many people are also aware, that, Canada is a haven for criminals and when I also discovered, that, the Toronto police, 14 division, and also others, including the government, directly and also the court, were actually working, with those who are also believed, to have committed a crime, in some way, I had to report it, like I did here, regarding the Li Xia Yu and the Idholo Hugues cases. Simply because it is also corruption.

THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA MAKES DECISION TO DISMISS MY APPEAL.

5 MONTHS AFTER MY 'URGENT MOTION' TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANDA, IT
HAS FINALLY MADE ITS DECISION, REGARDING THAT MOTION AND ALSO TO DISMISS MY APPEAL. AT THE SAME TIME, IT HAS ALSO GRANTED, THE RESPONDENTS, THE RIGHT TO SERVE ME, BY SUBSTITUTED SERVICE, REGARDING THEIR OWN MOTION, THAT WAS ALSO FILED, SUPPOSEDLY, IN MAY, OF 2012.

On September 27, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada, made an order, regarding my appeal , as well as regarding my 'urgent motion', that was also before that court, six months after they were both filed, with the S.C.C, to dismiss both the urgent motion, which it also ignored for five months and also my appeal, and at the same time, to also grant to the respondents, their request, in regards to their own motion, that was also filed, supposedly, at the same time, though I was also never served, with any documents. The Supreme Court of Canada also, deliberately, took no actions, to protect my rights, while my appeal, was also before the court. 
The case involved whether the respondents, managers of my coop, which also does not fall under the Residential Tenancies Act, had the right to dispute my application, in the Ontario Court of Appeal, where I had filed my appeal, based on the jurisdiction of that court. The court of Appeal then later claimed, that the Divisional court, was the 'right' court, to hear the appeal and so refuses to hear the case. The Divisional court, based on its own jurisdiction, only deals with matters involving 'errors of law' only and not those involving, errors of both law and fact. TThe Court of Appeal's decision to dismiss the case, was then appealed toe the Supreme Court of Canada.

While the case was also before the Supreme Court of Canada, including the motion for a stay of execution, that was also pending before the S.C.C, the respondents also acted with the Sheriff's office, to carry out an illegal writ of possession, regarding my home. The Supreme Court of Canada, also remained silent on the matter, despite my urgentt motion,  for it to act to protect my rights, while it also decided on my appeal.
Canada 's so called 'highest court' also refuses to do so and for five months I also waited for a decision, on that motion, while I was left with just the clothes on my back, after the illegal actions, that was also carried out, by the respondents and the Sheriff's office, against me. I was left with nothing, basically, while they also removed the contents of my home and changed the lock on the door.  The Supreme Court of Canada, still took no actions to protect my rights, while it also decided on the case. We know that the actions of the Sheriff and also the respondents, were illegal, because the law is also very clear on that.  It basically stays, under the Court of Justice Act, the actions of a third party, such as a Sheriff, while a motion or an appeal, is also pending before the court. 

Somehow, that law didn't apply to me and the Supreme Court of Canada, based on its own actions, also agreed. The Supreme Court of Canada Act, also, supposedly, stays such as action, as well, but again, not when it comes to me.  The overall conspiracy, was also very evident, regarding the actions of the Canadian courts, and the others involved. It is now left up to me to seek damages against their actions, but this is also unlikely in any Canadian court. So both my civil and also my crimainal charges against those responsible, will also continue in the international court, where I also hope to be outside of the influence, of the Canadian government and its persecution of me, as an individual.

"Canada trying to exterminate aboriginals", former chief says.

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Aboriginal leader blasts Canada for human rights violations


Native Leaders In Iran, To Get Support Against Canada's Human Rights
Abuses, Against The Aboriginal People.

"CANADA TRYING TO EXTERMINATE ABORIGINALS", SAYS TERRY NELSON,
CANADA'S  FIRST NATION CHIEF.

Canada's Aboriginal Leaders, Terry Nelson and Denis Pashe, are in Iran,
where they have accused, the Canadian Government, of Human Rights Abuse,
against the Aboriginal people. They have accused Canada, of having "concentration camps"
regarding its Indian reservations and also of that country's efforts, to "wipe out the
aboriginal people, of Canada".

The two First Nations Chiefs, also talks about the "mass graves of the First Nations children, who were murdered, as part of the residential school program" and "That has been covered up by the current Harper administration, Harper government and I do not call it the government of Canada, in fact, the Harper government calls it the Harper government, not the government of Canada".  This was also directly refering to the missing 600 Aboriginal women, who were also ignored by the Canadian government, and which the Native Chiefs, has regarded as an attempt to commit genocide, against the Aboriginal people.  According to Denis Pashe, the former chief of the Dakota Tipi First Nation, “It’s part of the ongoing effort by the Canadian government to exterminate us,”  and “We are a race of people who are endangered.”

The Manitoba, Reseau River Chief, Terry Nelson, also says, that, "We have tried very hard to open up human rights issues and we have sent lots of documentations at various embassies..." “The Iranian Embassy was the only embassy to respond". 

The Iranian television, which was also sympathetic, to the case of Canada's human rights abuse, also took up the claims against the Canadian government, much to the relief, of both the First Nations Chiefs, and also on behalf of other human rights abuse victims, currently, in Canada. The Iranian article, also refers to  "THE OTHER BLACK MARKS" in Canada's human rights abuse record, as well. "The widespread human rights violations in Canada go unnoticed in the West as Ottawa’s allies turn a blind eye to the issue".

I say, that it is high time, also, that the world should finally sit up and take notice, of the Canadian government's human rights abuse and other crimes against humanity. It is also a case of the 'chicken coming home to roost', so to speak. Canada has long pointed the finger, at the Iranian government's human rights abuse, while trying to maintain its own innocence. It is of course a lie and now the world, has been given a more truthful version, of its actions, by the two First Nations chiefs, concerning its disregard, for human rights, in its own country.  Sadly, they have also been ridiculed and maligned, in the Canadian press,, which are pro government and also further exist, to extend, the reign of terror, by the Canadian government, against certian people living in that country.  The First Nations people, Blacks and anybody else, that the Canadian government, also chose to target and to abuse their human rights.

Friday, October 12, 2012

THE OUTRAGEOUS ACTIONS, OF THE TORONTO 14 DIVISION POLICE.

Two weeks after the charges against the accused, Hugues Idholo was withdrawn, due to the corruption, by the police, the crown attorney and the court, the police has contacted the victim, on Thanksgiving Day, to tell her about the case and also claiming, that, the accused was to also write her a letter, of apology, as part of the deal, which has also not materialized, for his charges being withdrawn.  That is their version of the events, but the victim, in this case, would also like to see, all of them, answer to the public, for this corruption, as well.

Part Two:

When the police was called, recently, about the man Huges Idholo and another occupant, who is also believed, to be the sister, of the owner of the building, allegedly setting off the smoke alarm, by putting oil, intentionally, on the burner of the stove, two rogue cops, from the Toronto 14 division police, showed up and insted of doing an investigation, actually gave him the 'high five'.  They also commented, that, he did not have to speak, to the police, about the incident and send him off on his way.  The fire department, however, has also taken the complaint, of what appeared to be mischief, on his part, more seriously and is also investigating, the incident.  Since having the charges against him withdrawn, the man has been acting really brazen, believing that he can get away with anything.  He has even told the victim, who the police has also claimed, he was to write an apology letter to, but which she has also never received, either from him, or from the court, that, "the police won't arrest him and that she was a loser".

My take on that comment, is that the man also need to see, beyond his peripheral vision, because if I remember, correctly, he is also facing other charges, regarding the victim. The charges of assault with a weapon, uttering death threats and threatening to kill an animal, are not charges that should be taken lightly. One police officer, did called the accused, "an idiot" and I can also see why.

Toronto - The Crown Attorney's Office, Withheld The 911 Tape Evidence.


The date of this interview is October 9, 2012.

Saturday, October 6, 2012

The Toronto Police and The Court Corruption Regarding the Hugues Idholo ...


October 4, 2012.
"You cannot view the file". says the clerk, in the court support office, at the Old City Hall Court, in Toronto. Her manager, also agreed and brought back a one page doc. that she also claimed, was all that the file contained. At the left hand corner of the document, can be seen a staple, where  the said document, was obviously attached, to another one. I was told by a lawyer, who was close by, that the accused arrest record, would've  been attached to it, but it was definitely removed, by the court clerk.
Excuse me, also, but that is public record now.

The Hugues Idholo Case: The Missing File, From The Office of the Justice of the Peace..


October 4, 2012
The private information, against the accused, Hugues Idholo Yala, is also missing, from the office, of the Justice of the Peace. And the entire court record of the accused, also consist of a one page document. Missing from the court file, is also the 911 tape and other evidence, that are also crucial, in the prosecution of this man. The police did their job, thoroughly, in trying to protect, one of their agent, in this case, I also believe.  But the case is not over yet.

ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT. A To...