Monday, November 30, 2015

CORRUPTION IN CANADA, IS A VERY WIDESPREAD PROBLEM. AND NOT JUST WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT.

THE RCMP, CANADA'S TOP LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, HAS BEEN REPORTED IN THE VARIOUS MEDIA, AS BEING CORRUPT. SO HAS CSIS, CANADA SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICE, WHICH HAS FACED NUMEROUS LAWSUITS, OVER ITS ILLEGAL PRACTICE, OF TARGETING, HARASSING AND USING ITS VERY BROAD POWERS, TO ATTEMPT TO FRAME UP ITS TARGETS. WHENEVER ITS OTHER TACTICS DO NOT WORK.

According to the revelations from a Whistle blower and a former Heritage Front member,  the Canadian government, has had some of its top politicians, and also police and security agencies organizations, as members of white supremacist groups. Among the revelations are the following: 

1. CSIS, HAS OPERATED AND ALSO FUNDED A WHITE SUPREMACIST GROUP, THE HERITAGE FRONT.

2. FORMER CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER, STEVEN HARPER, WAS ALSO A MEMBER OF A WHITE SUPREMACIST GROUP, IN THE 1980'S, CALLED THE NORTHERN FOUNDATION, BEFORE GOING ON TO BECOME, THE PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA.


Among the charges against the RCMP, are corruption, money laundering, fraud, tax evasion, in regards to the practice of its leaders, most notably, President James Christie, Vice President Martin Bain, and CEO Carl Walsh, in their offshore practices, of setting up 'dummy' companies, or corporations, to hide their taxable income, from those investments. And some of those investments, also include using union money, to purchase condominiums in the Bahamas, and the formation of companies, to provide exclusive travel services for those corrupt cops, as well as for their friends and partners in crime. There are also hundreds of cases, which are also provided by the RCMP, directly, of internal corruption, within that organization itself. As well, the RCMP almost never acts alone, but always has the service and the support of CSIS, in regards to the investigation of some cases, involving select targets of the Canadian government. I say select, because those targets, also seem to fall under certain religious, or ethnic groups. Prominent among those groups, are Muslim Canadians, African Canadians and also Arab Canadians. In one report against the RCMP, 300 of its current and former female officers, has charged their superiors for sexual harassment. And as far as CSIS is also concerned, there are also numerous lawsuits, that has also being filed against that agency, from Canadians, for violating their rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  And the list is also very long. I am not talking abut the more recognized cases, that are often in the media and for the wrong reasons. CSIS has been accused of using tactics, that are straight out of the gestapo, on its targets.

Yet, CSIS, as a national security agency, has also been involved in the kind of internal corruption, that also rivals the RCMP. No one is also really surprised at these findings, against Canada. In fact, just a cursory view on the internet, will also reveal an abundant amount of evidence, of its corruption. So why does it still in most cases, retain its squeaky image, of a country that is above reproach?. When all levels of its government and also its top policing agency, the RCMP, are also mired in corruption?. Does the Canadian media also has something to do with the suppression of this information?. I do not blame the media, as much as I also blame those so called human rights agencies, such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, as well as the Canadian Civil Liberty Union, for helping to suppress, the reality of a corrupt government in Canada. Thankfully, though, their reports are also not necessary, for the world to get a full view of what that country is like.

International governance, such as the UN, the World Bank, and others, has all put out their own reports, about Canada's actions, that can also be compared with other countries, acting corrupt. One report that has been put out by the World Bank, on a list of 250 international companies, that are also blacklisted, from bidding on its global projects, 117 of those companies are from Canada.  Most of those companies, which are also affiliated with the Montreal, Quebec company, SNC- Lavalin, the primary target of the investigation, are also debarred for 10 years, as a result of their corruption.

As for the UN's report on corruption in Canada, it is even more of a laughable matter, since Canada has also ratified the UN''s treaty on corruption. Canada as a country, is guilty of so many violations, under the UN's various treaties, that I won't even begin to list them all here. The UN's treaties on human rights, torture, corruption and many others, has all been blatantly ignored and also openly violated, by that country.  And Transparency International, in a surprised break in its usual report on Canada, has also ranked it as the worst of the G7 nations, on corruption and bribery.  Canada also has a practice of corruption, most notably bribery, in other countries, by Canadian officials operating in those countries. And it also ranks as one of the worse offenders, internationally, regarding that matter.

As an advocate against the Bill C-51 legislation, which in the view of most people is a flagrant violation of human rights and especially of those rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, former white supremacist and now whistle blower, Elisa Hategan, has come forward with some revealing and damaging accounts of CSIS, Canada's national security agency, as operating and funding, one of the most racist organizations, in Canada, the Heritage Front. According to the whistle blower, it was CSIS agent, Grant Bristow, who also acted as the leader of the Heritage Front, for more than four years. And that during those times, the white supremacist group was also funded by CSIS, as well.  She also claimed in her book, that many other Canadian politicians from the Reform Party, were also members of other white supremacist groups, like the Northern Foundation. Of which former Canadian Prime Minister, Stephan Harper, was also a member. It is not difficult now to see how Stephen Harper, as the former Prime Minister of Canada, could also have helped to have enacted
Bill C-51, which gives police agencies, such as CSIS and the RCMP, very broad powers, in arresting and also detaining citizens, without a warrant, or even the reason for being charged. And also under that piece of legislation, also maintain secret court file, which they also do not have to revealed. Under Bill C-51, persons can be arrested and detained for up to 7 days, or even longer, under so called threats to national security. If this sounds like the actions of a police state, it is also definitely
considered so, by many people, not only because of the abuse of police authority, but also because of the abuse of citizens rights, under not only Canadian law, but also under international human rights laws.

And CSIS, as well the RCMP and also the local police, also operates many tactics against private individuals, such as activists, including against this writer, that are not only illegal in nature, but also should be considered as an open violation of international laws, against human rights.

So what do you think of a country, whose former and current politicians, are members of racist white supremacist groups?. Even leading up to the former Prime Minister, as a member of such a racist group. And how about its police agencies, such as the RCMP, committing crimes, that not even most regular citizens commits and also for the most part gets away with their crimes and also their corruption. Would you not say that this was a corrupt country, not unlike many other countries which do the same?. And is there any end in sight to what is an openly corrupt government?.

I have been reporting recently, on corruption at the local level of government in Canada and most specifically, about one such Canadian government officials, the City Manager , Peter Wallace, who as such also holds one of the highest position in local government, in Toronto. I an also here to report further, that after contacting his office, several weeks ago and also speaking with his assistant, Julie Scarchello, about following up on why some Toronto city officials, has also not carried out their duty to lay charges, regarding an investigation, that the City Manager, also claimed that those charges would also commenced, by those officials, that I have not gotten back a response from the City Manager. This is the the same guy, who when he was also appointed to his new position, back in May, also promised to operate his office, with transparency, openness and accountability to the public. We have also not seen any of those promises come to fulfillment either from him.

What the public has witnessed through my dealing with that  corrupt local Canadian government official, is that he has now provided irrefutable evidence of his practice of racism. He has also provided irrefutable evidence of his personal corruption. And viewing the matter more closely, what do you think that this country's actions will also be next?.  Fortunately, the world is also sitting up and taking notice of its actions. As a persistent violator of human rights, I have also been living under its illegal surveillance, harassment and torture, as a human rights activist. Yet no one seem to think that those actions, on the part of that country, is also serious enough. There are also many others like myself, who are also targeted and has seen its criminal actions, upfront. We will keep on talking about it until something is also done.
























Saturday, November 21, 2015

GENEVIEVE GUILLAUME, FASHION DESIGNER.

CONGRATULATIONS, TO MY DAUGHTER, GENEVIEVE GUILLAUME, WHO AT AGE 21 YEARS OLD, (AND ALSO A NURSING STUDENT, IN UNIVERSITY), IS ALSO ONE OF THE YOUNGEST FASHION DESIGNERS, AROUND TODAY. HERE SHE IS BEING RECOGNIZED, FOR HER AMAZING TALENT, AT THE MISSISSAUGA INTERNATIONAL FASHION ASSOCIATION'S SHOW, ON NOVEMBER 16, 2015.


WHEN HER OLDER SISTER, KAYDEE GUILLAUME, WAS ALSO A FINALIST, IN THE MISS UNIVERSE/CANADA BEAUTY PAGEANT, I ALSO PROMOTED HER HERE, ON MY BLOG. AND I AM ALSO DOING THE SAME, FOR HER YOUNGER SISTER, JENNY. 

THE ACHIEVEMENTS, OF MY TWO DAUGHTERS, HAS ALSO ENCOURAGED OTHER BLACK GIRLS, TO DREAM BIG. THEY ARE NOT JUST TALENTED,BUT ARE ALSO HARD WORKING, DETERMINED, (LIKE THEIR MOTHER), AND HAS ALSO DONE THINGS,THAT ARE ALSO UNPRECEDENTED, AS BLACK WOMEN LIVING IN CANADA. ONCE AGAIN, CONGRATULATIONS, TO MY DAUGHTER,GENEVIEVE GUILLAUME, ON A REMARKABLE ACHIEVEMENT. LOVE YOU MOM.







Friday, November 13, 2015

THE CORRUPTION OF TORONTO POLICE 11 DIVISION. WHEN THE POLICE POSED A DANGER TO THE PUBLIC.

HOW THE TORONTO 11 DIVISION POLICE, HAS ATTEMPTED TO FRAME ME UP, ON NOVEMBER 13,2015.

IF THERE WERE ANY DOUBTS, ABOUT THE TORONTO POLICE 11 DIVISION'S, CONFLICT  OF INTEREST RELATIONSHIP, WITH THOSE TWO PRIVATE LANDLORDS, THOSE DOUBTS ALSO DISSIPITATED, WITH THE POLICE ACTIONS, CONCERNING THEM, ON THE NIGHT OF NOVEMBER 13, 2015.

IT IS TIME THAT THE PUBLIC, BECOME AWARE, OF THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS, BETWEEN THE TORONTO POLICE AND ABUL BASHAR AND SHAMSUN BASHAR. SOME OF THOSE ACTIONS, ALSO INCLUDE, THE 11 DIVISION POLICE, THREATENING THIS WRITER, FOR EXPOSING, THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF THE BASHARS, REGARDING THEIR PROPERTY.
IT ALSO INCLUDE, THE TORONTO POLICE, ALSO ENGAGING IN CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR, THAT THIS WRITER HAS ALSO WITNESSED, WITH THE TWO PRIVATE CITIZENS. AND OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, THIS WRITER HAS ALSO WITNESSED, NUMEROUS SITUATIONS BETWEEN THE POLICE AND THE BASHARS THAT CAN ONLY BE REGARDED, AS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, ON THE PART OF THE POLICE.

THIS WRITER ALSO BELIEVE, THAT BOTH ABUL BASHAR AND SHAMSUN BASHAR, ARE ALSO WORKING, FOR THE TORONTO POLICE AND OTHER AGENCIES, OF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, IN THE CAPACITY AS AGENT PROVOCATEURS, AGAINST THIS BLOGGER AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST.

This has also posed a significent danger, to me as a Blogger and Human Rights Activist, exposing that country's human rights abuse.

Let me start off by saying that the police knew that I would be writing this article. I told them so, after they had attended my home several times tonight,  and after my landlords, Abul Bashar and Shamsun Bashar, has been turning off my hydro repeatedly, for the last several hours. Each time that they also attended the property, the police turned the power back on themselves, after obtaining the key, to the utility box, from the landlords.  Right after the police has left, the power would then go right back off. Yet, the police also claimed that they had also cautioned them, about disrupting the power to my apartment. 

It appears that the Bashars and also the Toronto Police 11 Division, were also attempting to frame me up, by the Bashars' actions to disrupt my power, repeatedly, which also did not affect them, or any of their other tenants in the building. The police also pretends to cautioned them. So then why did they turn the power off right after the police left?. And this action also went on several times during the night, so that I had to inform the police, when I also spoke with a staff sergeant, at the Toronto 11 Division Police, that it also seem a little odd, that the police can claim to caution someone and they also go right back to doing, the very thing that they were also cautioned about.

The Bashars modus operandi, would be to accused me of causing an overload, on their electrical sytstem, which would also caused the breakers to go on off, as a safety precaution. The problem with this theory, is that I also have several videos, showing my power being off, while the breakers were on. Videos that I had also taken, of different the 11 Division officers, investigating this problem, over the last several months. The Bashars also overload the electrical system themselves, on occassions, to make it look as if I had done so, using some appliance for instance, in my apartment that would also causing the breakers to on off. The problem with this plan of theirs and also of the 11 Division police, who is also behind it, is that I am still left without any power in my apartment. And I alone. And why would I want to be without power/.  It was just two days ago that I had to replaced all of the food in my refridgerator, after the hydro was also disrupted, by the Bashars. The same thing has happened again tonight, when the power was also cut to my apartment, repeatedly, over the last several hours. In fact, I am writing this article from a public place. An internet cafe. I also relayed to police, when I had also called the 11 division, directly, that I would be witing an article about it, and the police officer that I spoke with, officer Bulmer, badge # 9015, then told me, 'No, don't do that yet, give me your landlord's telephone number, and I will call them directly, about turning your power back on'. So I gave him the Bashars telephone number and he did call them. He also told me that the two other police officers, officer Walters badge 11085 and officer Bushy, badge 90518, who had showed up three or four times already, and turned the power back on themselves, were also on their way back to
the property. Sure enough, as I was locking up my door to leave and to go write on my Blog, and elewhere, such as on Google, the two corrupt cops from 11 division showed up. They also had the key, to the utility box, which was given to them by the landlord, on their earlier visits. They also turned my hydro back on, claiming, also, that the landlord has told them that they will be calling an electrician, the next day to 'fix the problem' with the power outage in my apartment.  The problem with this promise, is that on other previous occassions, whe the same thing had happened and the police had also attened, the landlord had said the same thing. That they were going to call an electrician, the same day, in fact and this was also a couple of months ago. I even at the time waived the 24 hour notice to enter my unit, so that they could do whatever 'work' that needed to be done to restore my power. But instead of the electrician coming that day, which I also recorded, the power in my rental unit simply came back on minutes after the police had left. The same set of officers that they had just agreed with, to get an elecctrician. So I call the police right back minutes later, the same officers who had also attended and I showed them that the power was now restored in my apartment.
Yet no electrician had come and no work was also done in my rental apartment. Yet only minutes later, I now had power restored to my apartment, without any electrician attending. I also video recorded all of these events and those video recordings are also now a part of the court file. Having gone to the court repeatedly, over the Bashars disrupting my power, which is really a Mischief charge under section 430, of the Criminal Code. However, the 11 Division police want to claim on behalf of the landlords, that it is a Landlord and Tenant matter. But in also trying to frame me up, using the Bashars, the police would also use the same Mischief charge under the Criminal Code, in order to do that. There is also no doubt that the 11 division police and the Bashars, are also working together.

I have now written the article, as I also told the police that I would. Believing also that they and the Bashars, are working to attenpt to frame me up. I also have been threatened by the 11 division about
exposing the the Bashars to the community.








Tuesday, November 3, 2015

CANADIAN JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LENA CRAWFORD, IS JUST ONE OF SEVERAL CANADIANS, TO ALSO FACE PROSECUTION, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

CANADA'S FORMER ROLE, WITH THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, WILL NOT PROTECT IT FROM FACING CHARGES, OVER ITS ACTIONS, IN COMMITTING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.  INCLUDING ITS PAST ROLE, OF HAVING A CANADIAN JUDGE, AS THE FORMER PRESIDENT, OF THE I.C.C. 


A TORONTO JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LENA CRAWFORD, WILL FACE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, OVER HER CORRUPTION, IN HOW SHE HAS DISPENSE WITH JUSTICE, IN A CASE INVOLVING HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST, VALERIE GUILLAUME. THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, THREW OUT A CRIMINAL CHARGE OF ASSAULT, AGAINST AN ACCUSED, WHO WAS ALSO ALLEGED, TO HAVE  COMMITTED AN ASSAULT, ON THE BLOGGER. JUSTICE OF THE PEACE LENA CRAWFORD, THREW OUT THE CHARGE, CLAIMING THAT IT WAS  "AN ERROR ON THE PART OF THE COURT", BEFORE THE MATTER COULD REACH A TRIAL. AND AFTER ANOTHER JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, HAD HEARD HOURS OF TESTIMONY, AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND HAD THEN DECIDED TO PROCEED WITH THE CRIMINAL CHARGE.  

The criminal intent on the part of Justice of the Peace, Lena Crawford, was to deliberately interfere, with the rights of the victim in this case, by acting in a conspiracy, to block the charge against the accused, from proceeding in the court. At  no time at all did she  consider, either, her responsibility before the court, in a legal proceeding. To act in a fair manner and to uphold the Charter of Rights and Freedom, in regards to the victim. She instead acted to devoid the victim, Valerie Guillaume, of those rights and to commit a crime in the process, by also acting coruptly.  In essence, she has reverse the role of the court in its previous decision, to proceed with the charge and also without having the jurisdiction to do so. 

Justice of the Peace, Lena Crawford.
Valerie Guillaume, Blogger and Human Rights Activist.


Taking the Canadian State, before the International Criminal Court, will be an uphill battle. And having any individuals of that State who has also committed any act, under international law, particularly, those under the Rome Statute, will also prove to  be difficult. But it is an action that I am also ready to face, in the pursuit of justice.  For the longest while this government has told me time and time again, through its actions, that it does not regard my rights as a human being, and worse, that it can  also do whatever it want in the face of international laws, to also deprive me of my right to life and liberty. It has also carried out torture against me, contrary to Article 5, of the Rome Statute, which it has so hypocritically helped to established and yet have also done everything against it, in regards to the people living in that country. From abusing the Aboriginal People's rights, to those of other marginalized groups, it has committed  all of those acts, which it has also ratified with the International Criminal Court.  And now its also want to get complete immunity from prosecution, for committing those crimes!.  The recent action of one of its courts, the Old City Hall Court, in Toronto and also by the Justice of the Peace Lena Crawford, will also prove to be one of the easiest cases to prosecute, under the right circumstances, against that State and also against the individuals being prosecuted on behalf of Canada, before the International Criminal Court. And under the grounds of committing Crimes Against Humanity, against me personally, that is also how the case against them will also proceed, in the I.C.C.  And no amount of influence from the Canadian government can also stop this process from taking place.  The Rome Statute has provided victims with more than ample
protection, in pursuing their cases, including the protection that are provided under Articles  68(1) and 43(6), both of which I am also entitled to have, in proceeding with my case against Canada and its government officials and police.

Ms. Fatou Bansouda, the head of the Office of  the Prosecutor, with the International Criminal Court, will also have no choice, in proceeding with this matter before the court. Whether she wants to or not. I will demand and also expect to have the protection of the I.C.C.  And the court cannot go back on its own principles.  The case is also stronger against some of the accused, than others. And Justice of the Peace Lena Crawford, also provide one of the strongest and clearest case, to prove before the court, that she has also committed those acts against me, which are also expressively forbidden by the court. And which in this case would also constitute an act in regards to  committing the act of Crimes Against Humanity.

































Tuesday, October 27, 2015

CANADA, HAS IGNORED INTERNATIONAL LAWS, ON HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, REGARDING ITS ABUSE OF MY RIGHTS.

UPDATE:  I am waiting to hear back from the International Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor, in regards to my case, involving Canada and the Canadian government officials and police. I will also be updating the public, from time to time, through Google+ and also my Blog, on my progress in that court. Keep viewing.

CANADA HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN ITS OWN COUNTRY, GOES LARGELY UNNOTICED, TO THE REST OF THE WORLD. INCLUDING CARRYING OUT, OPPRESSIVE ACTIONS AND ALSO INDIVIDUAL ACTS OF TERROR, AGAINST ITS OWN PEOPLE.

THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT'S CONSPIRACY, TO DESTROY  MY LIFE. IT HAS FAILED, DELIBERATELY, IN PROTECTING MY LEGAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY HUMAN RIGHTS, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWS. MOREOVER, IT HAS ALSO CONTINUED TO ABUSE, THOSE HUMAN RIGHTS THAT I HAVE AND TO DO SO OPENLY, WITHOUT BEING CHALLENGED, BY ANY HUMAN RIGHTS AGENCIES, COURTS, OR COMMISSIONS, OVER ITS ACTIONS SO FAR.


WHAT SHOULD CANADA'S ROLE BE, INTERNATIONALLY, WHEN IT CONTINUES TO CARRY OUT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN ITS OWN COUNTRY?. AND WHY HAS IS IT NOT TREATED, LIKE OTHER COURTRIES THAT DO THE SAME THING?. (ITS ROLE SHOULD BE REGARDED AS A MAJOR VIOLATOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS, TO THE POINT WHERE INTERNATIONAL ACTIONS, ARE ALSO TAKEN AGAINST IT. NOT UNLIKE THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES, WHICH IT ALSO HELPED TO BRING ABOUT THOSE ACTIONS AGAINST). THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT HAS CARRIED OUT, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, AGAINST ME. THIS IS ALSO A FACT. WHICH I WILL ALSO PROCEED WITH IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, AGAINST THAT COUNTRY.


JUSTICE OF THE PEACE LENA CRAWFORD'S, COMMENTS, ABOUT A CRIMINAL CHARGE: "The charge went on as an error". So now the court has no record of it, and the previous position of the court, to proceed with that criminal charge against the accused, has also now been viewed as an error, by the court. We are not talking about the charge being withdrawn by the crown attorney, we are talking about a new and very corrupt, Justice of the Peace, Lena Crawford, refusing to proceed with a criminal charge, because she also believed, that her colleague, Justice of the Peace, L. Stethem, made an error by proceeding with that charge against the accused. And all of this before a trial took place, which would have also brought about the hearing of all the evidence, from all of the witnesses. What proof, or new evidence, did this Justice of the Peace, Lena Crawford, have on the matter now, for her to decide that it was an error of the court in the first place, to proceed with that charge?. THAT IS WHAT PROOF, OTHER THAN CORRUPTION, ON HER PART?.

THE FACT, THAT, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LENA CRAWFORD, OF THE OLD CITY HALL COURT IN TORONTO, HAS BEEN ALLEGED, TO HAVE COMMENTED ABOUT A CHARGE BEFORE THE COURT, OF ASSAULT, AGAINST THE ACCUSED, SHAMSUN BASHAR, THAT WAS ISSUED BY A PREVIOUS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, L. STETHEM,  ON AUGUST 12, 2015, THAT, " THE CHARGE WENT ON, ON AN ERROR". WHICH MEANS THEREFORE THAT THE COURT WILL NOT PROCEED WITH THAT CHARGE. AND ALSO DID NOT DO SO.


This information was also given to me, by a clerk at the Old City Hall courthouse, name Beverly in the court support office, on October 27, 2015. She has alleged that those were the statement of the court, when the accused, Shamsun Bashar, was also before the court on October 26, 2015. She also alleged that the accused who was in court on September 28, 2015, was also not scheduled to be in court, on October 16, 2015, but instead on October 26, 2015. This is also a direct contradiction to the evidence that also exist, which is that the accused was in fact, in court on October 16, 2015, on the said matter, that was also put over from September 26, 2015. So how did the court date of October 28, 2015 come up?. I believe that date was also conveniently mentioned by the court staff, because the court, also wanted to dismiss the matter and to not proceed on it. Further, I also believe that this was done, because the court also knew that the following day, I also had other matters in that court, consisting of more criminal charges, against the same accused and other Canadian government officials, that, it had also decided beforehand, to not proceed with and to disregard as well.
What about the October 16th date and why was this date later changed in the court record, to   October 26, 2015 and then the court also claimed, that no date of October 16, 2015, has ever existed?.
Who is the accused and what is her role, in regards to this cover up and also corruption by the court?
Why did the court said that it has made a mistake in the criminal charge against the accused, after the same court, also decided on August 11, 2015, to proceed with the criminal charge against the accused?.
Is the court saying that the previous Justice of the Peace, L. Stetchem, who also issued process on the charge, did so as an error?. Because I can also tell you that this same Justice of the Peace, L. Stethem, also heard a full day of evidence against the accused, by way of a pre-enquette hearing on my part, before issuing process and also issuing a summons for the accused to appear in court, on that charge. So therefore the court, according to Justice of the Peace, Lena Crawford, can now change its opinion on the matter, and all this is done before it even went to a trial?. Just by simply reversing the decision, of the previous Justice of the Peace, L. Stethem, who is also obligated under the law to hear evidence and to proceed with the matter, based on the evidence that was provided to the court.
I was not told that the crown attorney withdrew the charge, presumably, because there was no chance of getting a conviction, against the accused. Which is usually the legal reason to do so, (but I have also seen a crown attorney's do the very opposite, and that is to withdraw a charge, because there would be evidence of a conviction. Or that to protect the accused, she did not want the charge to proceed in the court). I am told on October 27th by the court clerk, that the court has regarded the charge laid, as an error, on the part of the other Justice of the Peace, L. Stethem, on August 11, 2015. And you have to wonder how that could also be the case, unless the present Justice of the Peace, L. Crawford, has also acted corruptly, in the matter. I don't have to point out here that she did.
My other opinion on the matter, is that from the start, the court, has only pretended to proceed on the matter and then just as quickly aborted its effort to continue to keep up with the farce. And what should that tell you, as members of the public, about the Canadian court's role in the protection of my rights, since the accused was charged with committing an offence against me, and for which the court has also previously heard a full day of evidence and then had decided then to issue process and with that action ,also, for the accused to also appear in court, and to answer to that charge. Now the same court has simply reversed its position and just turn around and just say that it has made an error on its part, in regards to the charge. And to learn further, on the following day, on October 27, 2015, that the other charges against that accused and others, will also not be proceeded with, by the same court. Since those charges were also laid by me, as well. Do you not see the direct correlation between those two events?. The first on October 26th, to view a charge against one of the accused, as an "error", on the part of a previous Justice of the Peace, and also to disregard the other charges, on which a decision was made in regards to those other charges, on October 27th, as also a waste of the court's time. and the fact that all of those charges, against all of the accused, were also laid by me?.


Let me tell you this, that when the Canadian court wants to act corruptly against you, it will do just that. On another matter at the same court, today, on October 27, 2015, at a pre-enquette hearing, that was also heard by another corrupt Justice of the Peace, at the Old City Hall court, name Ana C. Costa, was also thrown out, and despite the seven video evidence, which I had also presented to the crown attorney, John Scutt and which the court also heard (and also viewed), prior to her decision today, which also in my opinion also demonstrated the prima facie evidence, which the court also need to proceed on the charges, against the accused. Those video evidence were also dismissed by the court, on October 27, 2015 and it is hardly a coincidence, that I was also told about another charged that was allegedly thrown out against the same accused the previous day, On October 26, 2015, which in my opinion was also not the truth. If the accused was told to come back to court on October 26th, when the accused also attended court on October 16th, then that would also make more sense.


The actions of the Canadian government against me, in abusing my human rights and especially in the courts, is simply that government saying to me and everyone else, that it does not regard me at all. Certainly, its so called constitution with its so called guaranteed rights, also do not apply to me. My question is this?. Does it really think that it can make a mockery of international laws, which says that I have those same rights, which it has also ignored and or disrespected, and also not have to answer for its actions?. I am not dead yet, though it wish this to be the case. And as long as I have life and the continued use of my faculties, I will also demand that justice be done, to protect my rights as a human being. I AM NOT ASKING FOR THIS TO BE DONE. I AM SAYING THAT THIS WILL BE DONE.
If the Canadian government is saying to me and to the rest of the world, that my life do not matter, when in fact it does, under international human rights laws, then its actions should also be viewed as a crime against humanity, including the action of trying to commit genocide, in the act of torturing me, to bring that about, since as a member of an ethnic group, it has tried to bring this about. Whether I have survived its actions to carry out the act of genocide, against me, because of my belonging to a particular ethnic group that it has also targeted to get rid of, and also in so many different ways of going about accomplishing this, then that is what it should be charged under.
We know that this act of genocide by the Canadian government, was also committed against the Aboriginal Peoples of Canada. But hasn't it been quietly also committing genocide, regarding other ethnic groups, such as Blacks, in Canada?. Since in the eyes of that country, those people's lives do not matter one bit and therefore is also not in need of protection, under its so called constitution. That they can be excluded from having the protection of their legal rights, under the Canadian constitution. And also by the government also carrying out other means of eliminating them?. And it also do not matter, whether this is also done on a mass scale, or not. The targeting of any person of an ethnic group, in Canada, is also the same as targeting the group as a whole. And how long can it hide behind its so called laws and carry those actions out?. Or to hide behind the banner of human rights and still carry those actions out?. CANADA: YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS THAT WE HAVE TO RESPECT, OR TO PROTECT

There is a long list of Canadian government officials and those of the courts, including the judges and the justices of peace, who will be charge, under international law, for committing crimes against humanity, against me. And  the paper trail goes back for many years. It also hopes that I will either be dead, or to suffer some other detrimental effect, before I get to see any of its actions against me, brought to justice. I wish to say that I will be around to see all of this take place. And that I will also be the one to see that it also happen.

I do not like, as this country and its courts are wont to do, when Justices of the Peace, such as Ana C. Costa, who has no legal background, also decides on a matter in court, for obvious reasons. And why should they stop?. Unless people like me, who also reports on their corrupt in the media, do more to make this practice also stop, with the court. There are Justices of the Peace, with a legal background, but imagine the injustice to the person whose rights are also violated, when those other Justices of the Peace, who has no legal background, gets to decide on their matter. And with this practice, it also do not matter to them, since no one gets to view their actions. Or so they believed.
 

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

PRIVATE PROSECUTION, TO PROTECT AGAINST AN ASSAULT, SHOULD ALSO BE THE SAME, AS IF THE POLICE HAS LAID THE CHARGE.

PROTECTING YOUR RIGHTS AND ALSO YOUR PERSON, AGAINST AN ASSAULT, OR AGAINST AN ASSAULT CAUSING BODILY HARM (AGGRAVATED ASSAULT), UNDER CANADIAN LAW. AND WHY THIS LAW SHOULD ALSO APPLY, EVEN UNDER PRIVATE PROSECUTION.

Crown Attorney, John Scutt, at the Old City Hall Courthouse in Toronto, has tried to knock down an assault charge, laid under a private complaint, even when it has also resulted in injury to the complainant. There is no limit to the length that this prosecutor and others at that court, will also go, to act corrupt. In this case against me, personally. And to refresh the public on this fact, let me also mention here, the 2012 case, against another accused Hughes Idholo, in which the Crown Attorney's Office, at the Old City Hall courthouse, inToronto, did nothing less than to withhold a 911 tape of the accused threatening to kill my animal, so that the matter will also not go against  him, in the court. In fact, due to the crown attorneys, withholding that crucial piece of evidence,that charges were also dropped and the matter did not even go to a trial.

If someone has to seek medical attention over actions that has caused them injury, by someone else and it was also done intentionally, and also without their consent, that person should be charged with an assault against the victim. Even if it is a private prosecution and not a charge that was laid by the police. (Who in this case, is also in league with the perpetrator). See my other articles, on how the Toronto Police 11 Division, has also contributed to the assault, by refusing to have the police also investigate, in regards to the complainant. Who also happens to be this writer. And on one occasion, the police also made sure that the attack also continued throughout the night. Without even responding to the calls to come and investigate. 

Assault is generally listed under section 265.1 of the Criminal Code of Canada. However, it include other sections as well, such as the ones listed below. I have only mentioned those sections of the Criminal Code, i n part here, but certainly even more sections of the Criminal Code, also apply. 

Assault. Section 269.of the Criminal Code of Canada:  Every one who unlawfully causes bodily harm to any person is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 269; 1994, c. 44, s. 18.

Assault. Section 267.of the Criminal Code of Canada:  Every one who, in committing an assault,
(a) carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon or an imitation thereof, or (b) causes bodily harm to the complainant,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months. R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 267; 1994, c. 44, s. 17.

I have a neighbor, who has been making some really excessive loud noises, (from an equipment used for that purpose), that is also damaging to my hearing. Really damaging. So that I have to seek medical attention for it. I have also gone to the court and charged him with assault, in regards to that matter.  The pre-enquette hearing, will be held on October 27th at Old City Hall courthouse in Toronto. I am also pursuing the matter in the civil court, for damages. If someone has caused injury to you, through an activity such as this, do you not believe that they should also be charged for that harm done to you? I will appreciate your comments here. Due to the conspiracy against me, in Canada and especially by the Canadian courts, they may also want to overlook this fact. But I believe such an action is an assault on the person and such a person should also be facing criminal charges over it. (It is an equipment that they turn on, which cause excessive noise, including the vibrations from it.). So the injury from it, is caused by both the vibrations and the loud noise, coming from it. There are laws under the municipal code which are designed to protect someone from exposure to excessive noise. Knowing that such a loud noise can also cause injury to one's hearing. If such a noise is not work related and is also caused by someone's deliberate actions to harass you, then this should regarded as an assault against the person. And especially if it also resulted in injury to that person.

Disclaimer : The information that has been provided here, in regards to the sections of the law, should also not be regarded as a legal advice. If someone assault you, then get a lawyer to help you with getting your rights protected. And if it is the Canadian court, that is blocking you, then in this case, I do advise that you exposed the actions of those involved. Why?. Because it is a human rights violation, against you. And it is also corruption.

Show less
1

Thursday, October 15, 2015

HOW CORRUPT IS TORONTO? ON A SCALE FROM 1-10, IT IS MOST ASSUREDLY A TEN.

TORONTO CITY COUNCIL MEETING :  HERE HE IS, MY FELLOW CITY COUNCILLORS. HE IS ONE OF US. MEANING: THAT PETER WALLACE, THE NEW CITY MANAGER, WILL ALSO FIT RIGHT IN, WITH THE REST OF THE ROTTEN BUNCH, AT CITY HALL.  FORMER MAYOR, ROB FORD, WAS ALSO RIGHT WHEN HE SAID, TO HIS FELLOW COUNCILLORS, "So the corrupt ones can stay right...?".
John Tory, Mayor of Toronto, endorses
Peter Wallace, as the City Manager,
before the Toronto City Council


   
























Julie Scarchelo, the Executive
Assistant, to the City Manager.
She lies effortlessly, even from
her body language. Here she is
answering my questions
on camera.






















PETER WALLACE, IS NOT ONLY A RACIST,  (FOR EXAMPLE, STILL DISPLAYING RACIST ATTITUDE, TOWARD  MEMBERS OF A MINORITY GROUP), HE HAS ALSO ACTED CORRUPT. IN HIS SHORT TERM IN OFFICE, SO FAR, THERE IS ALREADY EVIDENCE, OF CORRUPTION ON HIS PART. THERE IS ABUNDANT PROOF, THAT, HE HAS IGNORED CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE LAW,  IN ORDER TO COVER UP AN INVESTIGATION, INVOLVING THE WRONG DOING, OF OTHER CORRUPT, TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS. 

HOW CORRUPT IS TORONTO?   ON A SCALE OF 1-10, WE CAN SAY QUITE ASSUREDLY, THAT THE NUMBER IS 10.

 "Peter Wallace, as the City Manager, has done nothing to restore the public's trust in his office, after his so called investigation of those corrupt Toronto city officials, in the Municipal Licensing Standards and Building Division. What his investigation did established, is that corruption, is the order of the day, in how Toronto operates"  -  Valerie Guillaume

"To this date, there has been no change in the behaviour of those executives, Mark Sraga and Tracy Cook, as far as them upholding the law, as the head of Municipal Licensing Standards". "And particularly, also, in ensuring that they treat everyone equally. You have landlords who has to adhere to the law, as far as property standards and then you have those other landlords, like the Bashars, who openly breaks the law and with the knowledge and consent of those two corrupt Toronto city officials, Mark Sraga and Tracy Cook".  -  Valerie Guillaume

Here is a list of some of the Toronto city officials, who has acted corruptly, in regards to this matter. 
Toronto City Manager, Peter Wallace
Julie Scarchello, Executive Assistant, to the City Manager, Peter Wallace
City of Toronto, Ombudsman, Fiona Cream
Deputy City Manager, John Livy
Elaine Hung, Executive Assistant, to Deputy City Manager, John Livy. 
Director of Investigations, Mark Sraga
Executive Director, of Municipal Licensing Standards, Tracy Cook
Director of Building, Mario Angelluci
City of Toronto, (MLS) By-Law officers:  Joe Librandi, David Salitino
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing:  Cathy Trapanier, Jennifer Nuttall
Toronto City Councilor, Ana Bailao


The outstanding issues that Peter Wallace and those other corrupt Toronto city officials did not get, in regards to the investigation of the two corrupt landlords, Abul Bashar and Shamsun Bashar, who are also at the center of this investigation, is that they have in the past broken the law over their property and with the aid of those City of Toronto officials in the Municipal Licensing Standard, Building, they also continue to openly break the law.

Here is how they do it:  
1. They still maintain a multi level rental complex, in a designated single family dwelling house. Which, legally, cannot have more than two tenants. The Bashar, still currently, has five tenants.  
2. Though they are facing charges from the Toronto Fire Services, the Bashars has still not
 complied with fire safety standards, in such things as (a) overcrowding, or too many tenants; (b) no fire separations, between the different units.
3. No artificial lighting provided outdoors, or improperly done. 
4. Still maintain two illegal basement apartments, with glaringly fire safety deficiencies.
5. A burden on the integrity of the structure of the building. 
6. Unreported excess income, from the illegal rents, that are collected from the extra tenants.
7. No proof that they had gotten permission from the city, initially, to operate a multi-level rental complex. For example, no current, or previous licenses issued, for any operation of a rooming house, for that property.
8. The said property is still designated, as a single family dwelling, despite what the Toronto city officials has overlooked, about the Bashars' illegal rental property.

Questions to be asked?.
1. How can the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, MLS Executives, and Building Executives, ignore the fact that the Bashars, are still breaking the law, in regards to their rental property, in for instance, having too many tenants, above the legal limit of two? How are they able to get away with having five tenants, currently, unless the city officials had not 'looked the other way'. 

2. How can this be fair to other landlords, who has to adhere to the law, as far as the standards set out in the Municipal Code?. Which both the Bashars and the corrupt city officials has openly, broken.

3. How can the City Manager for Toronto, Peter Wallace, endorsed the criminal actions, of those city officials, like Mark Sraga and Tracy Cook?. Why did MLS not enforced the law, in regards to the Bashars?.

4. And why did the City Manager, Peter Wallace, cover-up an investigation about those city officials, that shows that this is not the first time that they have acted corruptly, in regards to the two crooked landlords, Abul Bashar and Shamsun Bashar, but that other complaints from the public, about their criminal actions regarding their property, was also ignored by MLS, Building and others.

Ultimately, the issue is not about two corrupt landlords, but about the Toronto city officials, who has no qualms about breaking the law themselves. They were quite comfortable in doing it and still does at the writing of this article. They don't have to worry about their positions, either, since they have also the guaranteed protection, from other corrupt Toronto officials, such as the City Manager, or the Ombudman, who will also cover up for them. They are like ravenous wolves and the public is their prey. 


Note:  It should make all of those City of Toronto officials, very nervous, since I plan to revive my internet radio show. And boy! will I be talking about them. I plan to join the Human Rights shows, with my former broadcasting host, on Internet radio. With my own human rights show, and a much improved version of  it. I do not think that any City of Toronto official, who has acted corruptly and not at all in the interest of the public, will either like, or welcome that show. They already hate me much.




Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Canadian Police Carries Out Attacks, Through An Agent Provocateur, Again...




Political repression of cyber-dissidents- Wikepedia, the free encyclopedia.
Political repression of cyber-dissidents is the oppression or persecution of people for expressing their political views on the Internet.

Human Rights Blogger, Valerie Guillaume, came under physial attacks on October 13, 2015, through an agent provocateur, as the 11  Division Toronto Police, also refused to come to her aid. 

Hours after taking out a Peace Bond, against her attacker, Human Rights Blogger, Valerie Guillaume, was told by police sergeant, Urvaniak, from the Toronto 11 division police, after her third call to the police that night, and after the increased attacks against her, that the police will not attend her home to protect her.



The Stalker, Monsoor Bashar, told police after being asked to stop turning off the Human Rights Blogger's lights, or going near her apartment door, which is on a different level from where he live, the perpetrator then responded that "I can do what I want...", to the police, as the Human Rights Blogger, looks on in shock, at the response from someone, who only hours earlier, had a peace bond taken out against him. He was not arrested by the police, and as a result he also increased his intimidation and violence, towards the Blogger, as the 11 division police sergeant in charge at the time, Urvaniak, also refused to send his officers, when she again called for the police assistance, to aid her. The police knew that the attacks also continued throughout the night, as the Blogger's calls, were not responded to, by the Toronto police, and has suffered, also, injuries to both herself and the animal that also reside in her home, as a result, of those attacks.
In the view of this Blogger, Valerie Guillaume, the situation with the Canadian police, as far as their violence towards me, has reached a critical point, so that there is no doubt in my mind, that the police also intends to harm me further, as they already did some hours ago, through their complicity, in not coming to my aid, to stop those attacks against me, by this person. It was clear to me, based on my conversation with the police sergeant, Urvaniak, from the 11 division police in Toronto, that he did not care one way or the other about protecting my safety. And in fact, also, deliberately aided in the attacks against me. For instance, he would not respond to my question of why the officers who had attended my home earlier that night, and had also witnessed the level of the noise also viewed it as excessive and asked the perpetrator not to continue with it at that level. His next set of police officers, did the opposite regarding my other call to the police that night, over the violence, and told the perpetrator to put the level at the highest and also left it at that. This was clearly to harass me and to also caused me injury, which only a few weeks ago I had to call the paramedic and go to the emergency at the local hospital, because of the pressure that was also built up in my ears, as a result of the volume, from the noise and also from the vibrations that was also given off by this equipment, that was being used by this person, Monsoor Bashar, throughout the night, to harm, harass and to cause serious injury to both human and animal, in my home.
The police also intend for this action to continue and to still be involved in carrying out acts of violence against me,that has caused me severe injury. This is a crime against humanity, for which those police officers involved, will also be charged in the International Criminal Court. And police sergeant, Urvaniak, of the Toronto Police 11 Division, even commented to me, in his sarcasm when I had requested the help of the police, on the night of October 13, 2015, that he also look forward to reading my article on his and the police actions. What should that tell you, as members of the public, other than the fact that the police, has also acted deliberately, to not only endanger my safety, but to also cause me harm, directly and indirectly, on this occassion and on other similar situations in the past. There is no doubt in my mind, also, that my safety is of absolutely no concern, to the Canadian police, as they have already shown, in carrying out those attacks against me.

 Police sergeant, Urvaniak, actually took steps to increase those violent actions over the next several hours, during the night of October 13, 2015, against me, by sitting at the station and not sending the police to my aid. And his relationship witht the perpetrator, should also be a cause of concern to the public.  Why did he allow this perpetrator, Monsoor Bashar, to respond to the police by saying to them, in regards to his criminal actions, against me, "I can do what I want..." and the police just shook it off, as someone who does not care to do what the police ask them to do, as the officer made excuses for him. What excuse does the police, have in allowing this person, to continue to be a danger to someone else and to not take the appropriate actions, to enforce the law. Such as taking seriously, the fact that the victim has taken out a peace bond against the perpetrator and he was also in violation of it, at the time. And has also given no indication to the police especially, that he will also stop his actions. A gesture, which the police also went along with, against me.










Thursday, October 8, 2015

THE CORRUPTION OF CANADA'S LEGAL SYSTEM: THE COURTS AND TRIBUNALS

HOW THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, ACTS CORRUPTLY, WITH MEMBERS BLATANTLY DISREGARDING THE LAW. AND ALSO THE RIGHTS OF THE TENANTS, BEFORE THE BOARD. 

(HOW BOARD MEMBERS PROCEED WITH MATTERS, THAT ARE BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD). IGNORING THE APPEALS OF THEIR DECISIONS, BEFORE THE DIVISIONAL COURT AND PROCEEDING AT THE BOARD, WHILE THOSE MATTERS ARE UNDER APPEAL, WITH THE COURT. AND THE OVERWHELMING BIAS SHOWN TO TENANTS, IN FAVOR OF LANDLORDS.





THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBER, DEBBIE MOSAHEB'S TOTAL DISREGARD, FOR RESPECTING, EITHER THE TENANT'S RIGHT,OR THE LAW, IN HER RECENT DECISION. MOSAHEB HAS CONTINUED WITH  A LANDLORD'S APPLICATION, AT THE BOARD, SECRETLY, WHILE THAT SAME APPLICATION IS UNDER APPEAL, AT THE DIVISIONAL COURT. MOSAHEB, HERSELF HAS ALSO ACKNOWLEDGE THE STAY ON THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION, IN A MEMO TO THE STAFF AT THE BOARD. MOSAHEB, HAS COMMENTED IN THE MEMO, "THERE IS A STAY ON TSL------------". YET SHE HAS CONTINUED TO PROCEED AT THE BOARD, WITH THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION, AS IF THERE WAS NO STAY IN PLACE. EVEN INSTRUCTING THE STAFF AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, TO ISSUE A NEW NOTICE OF HEARING, FOR A NEW DATE, THAT SHE ALSO SET FOR OCTOBER 8, 2015, ACCORDING TO THE INTERNAL MEMO, THE MEMBER, DEBBIE MOSAHEB, ALSO SCHEDULED THE HEARING FOR 30 MINUTES, TO HEAR THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION, THAT, IN FACT SHOULD NOT BE HEARD, UNTIL THE DECISION OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT.
THE S.P.P.A., OR THE STATUTORY POWERS PROCEDURES ACT., OF ONTARIO, UNDER SECTION 25, THAT STAYS THE DECISION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD,OR A TRIBUNAL, WHICH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD IS, DID NOT SEEM TO AFFECT THE DECISION, OF THIS CORRUPT BOARD MEMBER, DEBBIE MOSAHEB, IN HER DECISON, TO CONTINUE AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, WITH AN APPLICATION, THAT HAS ALSO BEEN APPEALED, AT THE COURT.  

AND TO MAKE MATTERS WORSE, IN REGARDS TO HER APPALLING ACTIONS, DEBBIE MOSAHEB, HAS ALSO BEEN THE COMPLAINT REVIEW OFFICER FOR PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, AT THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA! MEANING THAT SHE REPRESENTS ONE OF THE HIGHEST CANADIAN INSTITUTIONS, THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO UPHOLD THE LAW. THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA PROVIDE LICENSES FOR LAWYERS AND PARALEGALS, TO PRACTICE IN ONTARIO. WHO IS CHECKING HERE, ON DEBBIE MOSAHEB'S OWN PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, WITH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD?. MOSAHEB ALSO MADE SURE THAT NO ORDER, OR ENDORSEMENT OF HER DECISION, WAS ALSO MADE AVAILABLE TO THE TENANT, IN REGARDS TO THE HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2015, THAT WAS BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. A HEARING WHICH SHOULD NEVER HAVE TAKEN PLACE, AND FOR WHICH THE TENANT, WHO HAD FILED THE APPEAL AGAINST THE BOARD'S DECISION, TO HEAR THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION ALONE, ON SEPTEMBER 18TH, ALSO DID NOT ATTEND. THE MEMEBER, DEBBIE MOSAHEB, SIMPLY CONTINUED WITH THE MATTER, AT THE BOARD, ON ANOTHER DATE, SET FOR OCTOBER 8, 2015. WHETHER THERE WAS AN APPEAL AT THE COURT, OR NOT.

THE MEMBER, DEBBIE MOSAHEB, ALSO WROTE, AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE OF THE INTERNAL MEMO, CALLED A 'PROCEDURAL DIRECTION SHEET, OR A 'SCHEDULE B ADJOURNMENT' FORM, IN WHICH MOSAHEB ALSO ADVISED THE STAFF, WHO WERE TO PROVIDE A NEW DATE OF THE HEARING AND TO ISSUE A NEW NOTICE OF HEARING, OF THE FACT THAT THE MATTER WAS ALSO UNDER A STAY. MOSAHEB'S COMMENTED, "THERE IS A STAY ON THE TSL----------" MEANING THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION. WHY DID MOSAHEB THEN PROCEEDED WITH A HEARING AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, AGAINST THE TENANT, KNOWING THAT THERE WAS A STAY IN PLACE, ON THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION BEING HEARD AT THE BOARD, UNTIL THE DIVISIONAL COURT, HAS DEALT WITH THE MATTER?. ONE CAN SEE CLEARLY, THAT DEBBIE MOSAHEB, HAS ACTED CORRUPTLY.  AND THAT APPARENTLY, THIS IS ALSO STANDARD PRACTICE AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.









Thursday, October 1, 2015

TORONTO CITY MANAGER, PETER WALLACE, IS AMONG THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, WHO MAY FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, HAS ALREADY SET A PRECEDENT, FOR CHARGING PERSONS FOR OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND UNDER ITS COURT'S JURISDICTION.

IT MAY COME AS NO SURPRISE, TO SOME CANADIAN CIVIL SERVANTS, INCLUDING THE CURRENT CITY MANAGER, FOR THE CITY OF TORONTO, PETER WALLACE, TO FIND HIMSELF, FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES, UNDER INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW. THIS IS WHERE THE MATTER IS ALSO LEADING TO. PETER WALLACE, MAY FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND FOR OTHER OFFENCES, FOR HIS ROLE IN THE INVESTIGATION, OF OTHER CITY OFFICIALS. IN REGARDS TO WHAT DID, OR OMITTED TO DO, IN THE COURSE OF THAT INVESTIGATION.

ANOTHER PERSON, TO ALSO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES, IS FIONA CREAM, THE OMBUDSMAN, FOR THE CITY OF TORONTO. BOTH FIONA CREAM AND PETER WALLACE, HAS BEEN ACCUSED, OF PREVENTING THE INVESTIGATION, OF THOSE CITY OFFICIALS FROM TAKING PLACE, BY FURTHER COVERING UP THOSE ACTIONS.

Peter Wallace, Acting City Manager
has acted disgracefully, regarding his office


Peter Wallace, the City Manager for Toronto, is often described as a 'veteran civil servant'. In lay terms, it means that he is also an adept, at the corruption which is also a part of that government's practices. He is of course lauded by other government officials, like himself, for his tenure, at the legislature. But what must also be considered, is his role in dealing with the public. The transparency and accountability, for which he has talked so much about, in the new phase of his current position, as the City Manager, has also been nothing more than talk. Further, some other ugly truths, has also come out about him. Wallace, has been accused and also by this writer, of practicing racism, against a member of a particular ethnic group. I can also attest to the fact, that, Peter Wallace, is a racist. And so are most of the other Canadian government officials, or politicians, who also practice systematic racism. This racism can also be seen in different ways. Basically, that they uphold a system, that is also inherently, unjust, to some members of society.  I have personally been treated with disdain, by Peter Wallace and other members of his staff. This action came after my request for him to look into the actions of other Toronto city officials. In my interview with one of the staff of the Toronto City Manager, Julie Scharchello, I was reassured that this was in fact, what the City Manager, was doing.

Nothing could have been further from the truth. The investigation was also stalled, by Peter Wallace. I was ignored and they also thought that this was the end of it. I, on the other hand, did not feel that either Peter Wallace, the Toronto City Manager, or Fiona Cream, the Ombudsman, has also done the public, any kind of service, for their lack of investigation, into those corrupt Toronto city officials, in the Municipal Licensing Standards, and also the Building Division, who also happens to be the head of those divisions. We are talking about the Executive Director (who can also be replaced. And should also be replaced)), Tracey Cook and Mark Sraga, the Director of Investigations, for MLS. And also Mario Angellussi, the head of the Building Division.

It would have been all but convenient, for all of those city officials involved, if I and my fastidiousness, had also just gone away quietly. But I had also insisted on them carrying out their public duties, including those of the City Manager and also the Ombudsman. Which they also felt that they did not have to do, because of the likes of someone like me. Well I also got news for them.
If facing criminal charges under international law, against all of them, can do anything to change the way that corruption is also practiced in Canada, then that's is the way to go. I am adept enough to commenced the proceedings in I.C.C. court, against all of those involved. It also helped to know that the ICC has also dealt with similar cases. Actually, one other such case, dealing with obstructing justice. But that precedent, has shown that this can also be done. And I am also more than willing to proceed, in that court, against those Canadian government officials. Which some may also view as ambitious, on my part. But to me, it is just a normal practice of enforcing human rights. And also in this case, my own human rights. Obstructing justice in a legal proceeding, by those Canadian government officials, should not be regarded as a simple matter. It is corruption and corruption itself is also a crime. Mainly, a crime against the public. Since those persons involved will also never see any kind of prosecution, for their actions in any Canadian court, since I have also tried regarding some of those persons, already, then it is also left to the international law, which both they and also this country also fall under, to prosecute them. And this is also especially true, of the International Criminal Court. For which Canada, its hypocritical way, has also ratified, in its treaty with that court, under the Rome Statute, and yet has never followed through on its promise, must also face the consequences for its actions, in the violation of any of those (human rights) treaties, in regards to the International Criminal Court.