Wednesday, June 20, 2018

ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT.

A Toronto Corrupt Judge, Rachel Grinberg. Her court demeanor
and actions as a judge, belies her other involvements, as an
upstanding community member and as a Board member, of a
Canadian Charity. What the public do not know, is how she
and other judges, operates behind closed door.

Some of the practices of Ontario Judge, Rachel Grinberg, included, having   closed door hearings and excluding the public from participating. THIS JUDGE IS KNOWN TO LOCK THE COURTROOM DOOR, when dealing with the unrepresented and under privileged persons, appearing before her. Those who are most likely unable, to get any further assistance with their cases, through legal aid and are then forced, to represent themselves in the courtroom. Although they are often assisted by the duty counsel in the courtroom, this is also misleading, because both the duty counsel and the crown attorney, for the sake of argument, are on the same team. The duty counsel, will also not necessarily act, in either their best interest, or that of the public. 

The corruption comes from judges, like Ontario Provincial Court judge, RACHEL GRINBERG, who has a duty to uphold, by having her courtroom, being made accessible to the public. And it would not hurt either, to have cameras and other recording devices in the courtroom, that are designed to protect both the proceedings and the rights of the participants. It is shameful to see how this CANADIAN JUDGE, Rachel Grinberg, has allowed the public, including lawyers attending the courtroom for their other clients and others, to be barred from the courtroom, while she has the judicial pretrials and sometimes trials for the accused, who is also self represented. In fact, the courtroom door is locked, on her instructions. What does that say for any transparency, in the Canadian court?. Not much at all. It is shameful and illegal, how Judge Rachel Grinberg and other corrupt judges, disregard the rights of the individuals, appearing before them and persisting in operating the courtroom, in a manner that is also inconsistent with international human rights laws and even its own constitution.  One of the other charges, against Canadian judge, Rachel Grinberg, is to also continue with a criminal charge, against one of the accused, even after the sole witness could no longer be located and there is no sign that he would even appear in court, even for a trial. The judge was willing to continue with this "phantom case" in the court, in order to nail the accused. And even commenting on what might occur in the future, at a trial with no witness. Still, she was also willing to waste tax payors money on a trial that is unlikely to succeed, due to the lack of a witness. Not that it would have also succeeded, with the single witness, in regards to  his allegations based on his sole statements to the police. It is a case of a "he says, she says" and also a lot of unanswered questions for the police, in regards to their motive, for proceeding with a charge that is based on the testimony of a sole witness, who they also are unable to locate, because he has moved on and does not seem to have an interest in pursuing the charge, he has helped to lay against the accused for his own selfish reasons. Perhaps he also feared any counter charges being laid, with more credible and unrefuted evidence against him.  And that he is also unwilling to take that chance. And going along with this conspiracy, to pervert justice for the accused, is also Assistant Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell.  Blondell, has consistently refused to update the court, on the status of the witness and has also refused to provide full disclosure. WORST OF ALL, SHE HAS A PERSONAL AND VESTED INTEREST IN THE CASE, WHICH GOES BEYOND THE DUTY OF A CROWN. 
Toronto Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell, is known for her CORRUPTION
in cases before the court. As a Crown Attorney, she is known to lie openly and to also participate
in actions that are so corrupt and that also goes against public interest, that she is beyond
being corrigible. She has no morals, ethics, or any other redeemable qualities, which would
make her trustworthy, or that would also instill any confidence in her ability, to represent the
public, in her present job as a Crown attorney.
  I encourage members of the public to expose her corrupt actions, in letters to the Ministry of Attorney General, AND IN PUBLIC SHAMINGS, as I am now doing. For too long those like Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell-King, has relied on their actions being hidden from public scrutiny. Public shaming, is one way of getting those that she answers to, including the public, from tolerating her corrupt practices, and booting her out of her current position. Using her position to go after any members of the public, because of her personal interest in a case, or in acting in other ways to either pervert justice, or to interfere with the rights of persons, appearing before the court, is intolerable. The public will not accept this degenerate and wants her out of her present position, to act on their behalf.

  TWO OF ONTARIO'S CURRENT JUDGE AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE. JUDGE RACHEL GRINNBERG AND JP DIANE MCALEER. PROFILES:  FROM BEING PRIVILEDGED WHITE WOMEN, TO NOW UPHOLDING THE RACIST JUDICIAL SYSTEM, THAT BOTH PROMOTES AND PROTECTS WHITES.

HOW THEY BOTH PRACTICES RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. AND WHY THIS IS ALSO A COMMON PRACTICE, AMONG OTHER JUDGES, JPS, CROWN ATTORNEYS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, IN ALL CANADIAN COURTS.   




                           


Wednesday, May 16, 2018

CONFRONTING STATE TERROR: I AM A TARGETED INDIVIDUAL. AND THE GUILTY PARTY IS CANADA.


WHAT IS A TARGETED INDIVIDUAL? "A person who has become a target by any party, organization or entities. Ranging from corruption in business, or by the government and even being targeted by regular people i.e the community at large (who has been selected to carry this out, by one of the parties listed above). A person who becomes a targeted individual will face campaigns of surveillance of different degrees and generally speaking, campaigns that negatively impact an individual.  this could range from campaigns to harass, discredit, sabotage, instill fear and paranoia, manipulate, extort, or even assassinate; among others"... (Reprinted statement). (See the rest of my own article below).


HOW DOES ONE BECOME A TARGET OF THE GOVERNMENT?.  All that you need to do in order to become a target and a victim of your government, is to start telling the truth about its actions. You can become a target by either acting on your own, or as part of a group. Either way, once you have decided to exercise your democratic rights and to voice your opinions publicly, such as by protesting, demonstrating, or writing about the government as a journalist, or blogger, then expect that the government will also find ways, to curb your efforts to expose its actions. For many it may take the form of open persecutions. For others it may be less observable, but non the less heinous in its scope of atrocities that are also illegal and are committed against you. And which has abused your basic human rights. Nevertheless, you will also notice a marketable change in your environment and in others who may now become government agents, such as paid informers and or agent provocateurs, against you. Be that at your workplace, at your home, or your place of business.
The goal is to make you believe that you are being paranoid and that your are not really being targeted, or that you have somehow imagined the whole thing. What you should know is that you have now become a part of a government funded and black operation program, that is mainly geared towards mind control and of terrorizing you into submission. The alternative is that if you resist, you may also be eliminated by the government, using one of its most effective methods against you. Those who are mainly targeted are the following:
* Whistleblowers
* Bloggers
* Human Rights Activists
* Social Activists
* Journalists (who exposed corruption. i,e those who are independent and who are not sanctioned by the government controlled media)
* Anyone can become a targeted individual
* Members of a religious group, or of often a visible minority, or some other marginalized group
*Single parents (usually single mothers) (and most of whom have had their children removed from their homes, because they are viewed as being mentally unstable, when in fact it is the State which has targeted them, in order to take their children away)
* Those with some financial resources (I once met an elderly (black) woman who was targeted in such a manner, by the management of her apartment building. She was living in a subsidized unit and the management, wanted her to use up all of her financial resources,  in order to keep the unit. (They discovered that she had some investments). She experienced chemicals being sprayed in her apartment in her absence and was even forced to sleep under the staircase at night, due to the harassment). Finally, the management got her out of the building and she is now living in a shelter.
* One single mother (white) who have had her small child taken away by the Children's Aid Society, was also subjected to this kind of targeting. In fact she could not walk down the street where she lives, without seeing the "government authorities" parked on her street and carrying out this psychological abuse of her mental state. They wanted to make sure that she never got her child back, and also succeeded in making her into an mentally unstable person.
*

Keep in mind that often the targeted individual and the perpetrator, are both under mind control tactics used against them. The perpetrator who often knows the victim, are made to believe that by carrying out the targeting of the victim, that they are also doing their "civil duty". That is they are being good citizens, when in fact the entire aspect of the targeting is also criminal.

The internet is full of people who are now protesting against this atrocity and abuse of their persons and of  their human rights.
The tactics that are used Against targeted Individuals
* Blacklisted
* Psychological and physical torture, using remote weapons to target the victims in their homes and  anywhere else.
* Noise harassment
*Electromagnetic harassment
*Illegal surveillance 24/7
* Financial sabotage
* Email hacking, telephone tapping
* Satellite remote monitoring
* Loss of job
*Loss of family, friends and acquaintances
* Sleep deprivation
* Voice to skull technology
* The use of agents and provocateurs
*Microwave weapons
*Non consensual human experiments
* Food poisoning
*Torture and the killing of the victims pets
*covert drugging
*Illegal break ins
* Mind control
*Character assassination


James Bond 007 tactics, used against some targeted individuals. My personal Experience.
Some years ago, I was in the subway on the upper level waiting for my bus. A white man came up to me and jabbed me with an umbrella under my right rib cage. At first he said to me, "Don't I know you from somewhere?. I said "No, I don't think so". Next thing I knew, as he spoke to me, he also jabbed me (more like a light touch) with the point of the umbrella. I thought nothing of it at the time and when the bus came I walked towards the line and so did he. Being in front of him, I got on the bus first and waited to see if he was also getting on the bus. He did not. I looked out of the window and he was nowhere on the platform either. He just simply disappeared. What is unusual about this incident is that ever since that time, I have had a soreness under my right ribcage. I told this to one of my close friends years ago and we both thought that it was unusual. More so because of the fact that people do not normally go around jabbing other people with the point of their umbrellas. And for the victim to still feel the effect of it years later, as a soreness in the exact spot. I could have been micro chipped, or injected with a cancer gene. Or something else just as sinister. This also happened in broad daylight, on a somewhat sparsely crowded subway platform (upper level) and with people milling around. I am convinced that the Canadian government authorities, perhaps the police or CSIS, were behind it. It was something straight out of a James Bond movie and it happened to me. I am just a Blogger, who has been exposing the truth about that government's human rights abuse. So no one is safe from the government, in my opinion.
You only need to read my Blog (entirely) to find out the many other different ways that the Canadian government, has gone about targeting me. Including, at all levels of government, and who all have the same agenda. To destroy my efforts and in the process to destroy me as an individual. The conspirators are so numerous, that it is hard for me to fight back all of them. But I do try. I do not sit down and take their attacks, without responding to it. For one thing, their actions are no longer hidden, thanks to my Blog. Neither can they also expect to get away with their actions against me, without facing some kind of penalty. The absolute worst thing that a targeted individual can do, in those circumstances, is not to fight back. As a world wide community, our governments and others who carry out this criminal activity against the public, are learning that the victims will fight back. Despite their enormous black operations budget and their advance weaponry, the ordinary person can and often do find ways to fight against it. Do not give in to their tactics and never be silent about the atrocities that are committed against you. Take back your individual power and defeat the enemy.







Tuesday, May 15, 2018

ADJUDICATOR,NEIL KAUFMAN, A MEMBER OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, TOOK REPRISAL ACTIONS,AGAINST TENANT WHO HAS EXPOSED HIS CORRUPTION, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.


WHAT IS ONTARIO PREMIERE, KATHLEEN WYNNE, DOING TO ERADICATE THE CORRUPTION, THAT IS SO PREVALENT, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD?.
WHY ARE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBERS, ALLOWED TO DISREGARD THE LAW AND TO ACT CORRUPT, BOTH PERSONALLY AND REGARDING THEIR DECISIONS?  AND WORST, TO IGNORE TENANTS RIGHTS UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, WHICH GOVERNS THAT TRIBUNAL?.




ADJUDICATOR, NEIL KAUFMAN, IS THE LATEST MEMBER OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD,

TO BE EXPOSED, OVER HIS CORRUPT PRACTICES, AT THE BOARD.

Adjudicator, Neil Kaufman, tried to show "who was in charge", by taking reprisal actions against the tenant, in the form of staying his interim order and also discontinuing any further actions by the tenant at the Board, until the tenant pays a fine of $100.00, going back to 2015, plus the interest incurred over the past three years, to the Landlord and Tenant Board. Kaufman's action was based on retaliation against the tenant, for making public his other corrupt actions at the Board, that may not be in the interest of the public. 
Neil Kaufman and the Landlord and Tenant Board's actions in staying an order that was already prejudiced to the tenant, by not addressing the urgency of the matter that was also before the Board, when a landlord had illegally changed the lock, without an order from the Board. But also the actions of the Adjudicator, Neil Kaufman, was intended to cause the most severe harm to the tenant, by also discontinuing her actions at the Landlord and Tenant Board, if the tenant did not pay in full the amount owing, plus the accrued interests. Kaufman had to go digging into the tenant's previous records at the Board, in order to come up with that decision.
That in itself was prejudice to the tenant, whose current matter before the Landlord and Tenant Board, has no bearing on any previous applications that she had with the Board. It is also a practice by the Board against the tenant, that has been longstanding with the Landlord and Tenant Board.
Not only did the Landlord and Tenant Board and Neil Kaufman, showed a clear disregard for the tenant's current situation, of being locked out illegally by her landlord, but he also acted further to cause more harm to the tenant, by not only ignoring her request at the hearing on May 2nd, to have the landlord changed back the lock on the door, but also to delay the hearing to a date set in June of 2018 and then making a decision in his order that the said tenant should also pays to the Landlord and Tenant Board, a previous fine that goes back three years and that has no direct bearing on the application before him, currently.

In dealing with the tenant's application before him, Neil Kaufman, also acted to cause the tenant severe injury, that is also against the law. The tenant is accusing, the Adjudicator Neil Kaufman, of acting in a conspiracy to break the law, where she is concerned and is also willing to back up her claim in a court of law. The tenant also believed that other members of the Landlord and Tenant Board, including, these other Members, Ruth Carey, Louise Horton and others, has also acted in a conspiracy, to prevent her applications from proceeding at the Board, and in the manner that it should. Including also those in the Enforcement Division of the Landlord and Tenant Board, such as Jim Torreto and Kathy Trapanier, who took no actions to get her landlord to comply with the law, in regard to those offences under the Residential Tenancies Act.
The Adjudicator Neil Kaufman's actions are discriminatory against the tenant for several reasons. First he has ignored the first rule of conducting a hearing, which is that a tenant has the right to have a fair hearing, before the Landlord and Tenant Board.  And any variation of that is also a cause for further legal actions against himself and the Landlord and Tenant Board. 
And that it should also exclude prejudices of any kind. Including, about race. The tenant who is black, is also accusing the Landlord and Tenant Board, of practicing discrimination against her, based on her race. She also believe that too many Members, at the Landlord and Tenant Board acts corrupt and that there is no direct accountability, on their part.







































































































































































































































































































































  









ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT. A To...