SUPPORT THIS BLOG AND MAKE A DONATION.

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

CANADA IS SEEKING TO PROTECT ITS OWN CASE,BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT,BY GOING AFTER VENEZUELA.

CANADA, SHOULD LEAVE VENEZUELA ALONE AND FOCUS ON ITS OWN HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES. WHICH ARE MANY AND STILL UNFOLDING.

Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, has joined a Multilateral group of Nations, in trying to bring Venezuela, before the International Criminal Court, for is human rights abuses.
Canada, as a country and State, is itself facing criminal charges, before the International Criminal Court, for Crimes Against Humanity.
The difference between Canada and Venezuela, is that the former's crimes are secretly being carried out, while the latter's indiscretions are showcased before the entire world. Both countries are guilty, of violations of international laws, on human rights.

No one is taking the I.C.C seriously. Its ability to adjudicate cases fairly, has come under severe criticism. Along with is penchant for going after "third world countries", almost all of which are also African countries and leaving the more technologically advanced countries, out of the picture. When was the last time that the USA, Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Canada and other big name countries, has come under scrutiny, or even criticism for their actions, by the I.C.C?

It is no wonder that the USA, and other countries are showing their disdain for the I.C.C, by either pulling out of the treaty, or threatening sanctions, against that impotent and corrupt institution.
It is noteworthy here that Canada, has perniciously advanced its position, with both the International Criminal Court, the Inter American Commission on Human Rights and even the United Nations, just hide its own crimes. Its own violations on human rights issues.

-Human Rights abuse victims in Canada, have a difficult time in getting the I.C.C, to go after that country. Having a Canadian judge on its judiciary bench, almost guaranteed that the I.C.C could be found in the position of a conflict of interest, when deciding on a case against Canada.





CANADA IS A BIG HYPOCRITE AND ITS GOVERNMENT A DAMN LIE,





ON HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES. CANADA IN THE PAST, AS WELL AS NOW,
CONTINUES TO CARRY OUT, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE ATROCITIES.

ON BOTH INDIVIUALS, AS WELL AS GROUPS OF PEOPLE AS A WHOLE, IN THAT COUNTRY. IT IS A COUNTRY WHOSE GOVERMENT, IS OPERATED UNDER CORRUPTION. AS THERE ARE NO OVERSIGHT, IN ITS GOVERNANCE, TO IMPLEMENT MEASURES, AGAINST THAT PRACTICE.

The Residential Schools debacle, regarding Canada's Native Population. No less than a genocide.
The Chinese head tax and the Japanese confinement camps.
The enslavement of blacks in Canada.
The systematic racism that is a part of the fabric of Canadian society
The corruption that is practice by officials in government, and NGO working with the government.
The torture of Canadians, under programs such as MKUltra, in the 50's 60's and even now.
The persecution of Bloggers, by Canadian police and CSIS and others in the intelligence agencies.
Canada's practice of invading third world countries, for its natural resources and robbing them through its mining companies. Including, the use of forced labour, as in the Eritrean mining incident and other  countries in South America and Central America, some of which has tried to sue that country, over human rights abuse issues.
Canadian soldiers torture of Somali soldiers, and other war crimes.




But its still tries to pull the wool over the eyes of whoever is gullible enough to believe its lies.

Note:  This writer has a case against Canada, with the International Criminal Court, for its acts of Crimes Against Humanity, that was carried out against her, as a means of punishment. The case is still before the I.C.C. as the writer seeks a redress for those crimes that were committed against her, by that country.

Thursday, November 8, 2018

THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY'S CORRUPT MEMBERS: VICKERY BOWLES, NANCY MARSHALL AND SUE GRAHAM-NUTTER.






DOES TORONTO NEED, A CITY LIBRARIAN, LIKE VICKERY BOWLES, WHO DO NOT RESPOND, TO A PUBLIC INQUIRY?.  AND TO HOLD MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IN CONTEMPT, IN REGARDS TO HER ACTIONS?. NO, WE DO NOT.
Vickery Bowles. No response from
her, or the TPL, regarding the outcome
of the Children Book Selection Committee's
alleged meeting on October 11th, to review
my children books. It has been one month
of waiting for them to respond to my
inquiries, as to the outcome of the meeting.
I have gotten from them a "wall of silence"
concerning that alleged meeting.
My guess, is that the Committee did
not get to review those books, because
it was not given to the Committee,
due to the personal reasons, of those
TPL's Management staff. In other words
I believed that they have either blocked
the books from being reviewed. Or have covered
up the response from the committee, for their
own personal reasons. Which is also corrupt.
Sue Graham Nutter, TPL Board Chair.
Sue Graham Nutter, has failed to respond
to my written complaint, about TPL's staff.
Or to present my complaint to the TPL's
other Board Members.
VICKERY BOWLES, TORONTO'S CITY LIBRARIAN, HAS CHOSEN TO REMAIN SILENT, SOMEWHAT, ALTHOUGH SHE AND OTHER MANAGEMENT STAFF, OF THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY,  NOW SEEM TO BE USING PUBLIC FUNDING, TO GET THEIR LAWYERS, TO COME AFTER ME. AND FOR WHAT?.
For making it known that they have acted and continues to act racist, and also corrupt, towards a member of a visible minority. And that they have also implemented a racist policy towards members of a visible minority. One that included their personal opinions and attitude, as well as other disturbing actions on the part of the Toronto Public Library's Management and Board Chair and Vice Chair.






It is one month now since October 11th and the day that I was informed by the Toronto Public Library's Management staff, Michele Melady (and also acting on  behalf of Susan Caron and Vickery Bowles), that the Children Book Selection Committee, would be meeting on October 11th, to decide on the five books that I had sent to the TPL for review by that committee, in the hope of purchasing them. Now after waiting for one month (and still counting) to get a response as to the outcome of that Committee's meeting, regarding those books, I have yet to get a response from the TPL and specifically, from Vickery Bowles, Susan Caron and Michele Melady, regarding the outcome of that alleged Committee meeting. 
Personally, I am of the opinion that the Committee did not get to see my books. Here are the reasons why. # 1 That those persons mentioned, did not in fact present the books to the Selection Committee, on that date, or at any other times. #2. That they also never intended to present the books to the Committee. (Based on their own reasons). #3. That this was done because they did not want to purchase the books. #4. That they intended to defraud me out of the rights of those books, by holding on to the books still and not returning them to me, after one month of waiting, for a response. #5. That they acted in conjunction with others to sabotage my efforts to get those books purchased by the library. #6. That they have used their personal influence to that end. #7. That they have acted corruptly regarding the matter. #8. That they have also breached the public trust in this matter, if it was proven that they had lied about the Committee's meeting and the reviewing of the books #9. Or to have withheld the decision of the Selection Committee, in regards to those books, because they also intended to cause me harm, over that decision.
Corruption among Toronto officials is nothing new. That is how they operate and will continue to operate, unless their secrets are exposed to the public.









Wednesday, November 7, 2018

FREEDOM OF SPEECH, IS UNDER ATTACK, IN CANADA.

THE CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, SECRETLY UNDERMINED, MY EXPULSION FROM THE EMERGENCY SHELTER, IN ORDER TO CAUSED ME SERIOUS HARM. AS PART OF ITS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHEMENT OF ME, AS A BLOGGER.

THIS ALSO INCLUDED, THOSE IN THE SHELTER, SUPPORT AND HOUSING ADMINISTRATION.  INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING PERSONS: TAMIKA GIVENS,

MARK KIM, BRAD BOUCHER, PAUL RAFTIS, NATALIE WILLIAMS AND OTHERS.


THE PERSONAL CORRUPTION, OF BRAD BOUCHER, HOUSING CONSULTANT, AND ALSO RELATING TO THE FRED VICTOR CENTRE AND THE COVERUP OF THAT AGENCY'S CORRUPT PRACTICES.

SHELTER, SUPPORT AND HOUSING ADMINISTRATION: BRAD BOUCHER, HOUSING CONSULTANT. "YOUR BLOG POST AND COMPLAINTS, AGAINST FRED VICTOR CENTRE, IS VIEWED AS HARASSMENT BY THE STAFF". REFERRING, TO WHY THAT AGENCY, HAS REFUSED TO OFFER EMERGENCY SHETER AND ALSO IMPOSED A SIX YEAR RESTRICTION, ON BLOGGER, WHO HAS EXPOSED THEIR ACTIONS TO THE PUBLIC.




The complaints that this City of Toronto official, Brad Boucher, is talking about here, go back years before, when I had stayed at the Fred Victor Centre on Calidonia Road, in Toronto. I was also leaving an abusive situation and at the time it was also the only shelter that exist in all of Toronto, that also takes pets. Unfortunately, the organization was also full of corruption, in how the staff and management operated the shelter. There was much abuse of power and a lack of regard for the care of the animals. On one occasion I had made a video of two of the staff, who were the only ones on duty, who was much more interested in shooting pool, while they leave the emergency and crisis line unanswered in the office. On another occasion, a resident was attacked while sleeping alone by a male staff name Ken, who allegedly took it upon himself, to let himself in the resident's room where she was sleeping alone at the time. Breaking with shelter rules at the time, this male staff, who was supposed to be checking the dorm rooms with his female co-worker, who also happened to be fast asleep in the office, while he did the rounds by himself, late at night. The resident said that he had "pushed the door and came in on her". The Fred Victor Manager, did nothing to disciplined that staff. Further more and more homeless residents at the Fred Victor shelter, were being put out on the street with their animals, and without shelter staff giving a second thought as to how they would managed in the cold. (I had stayed there at the end of 2013, right around the holidays and left there in January 2014). Residents were also coming to me with their stories about their treatment at the hands of Fred victor staff and its onsite Manager, Danielle Ashby. One resident, was so afraid to tell her story at the time, while at the shelter, that she had agreed to for us to meet at the local coffee shop, to tell me about her experience, as a homeless woman at the Fred Victor shelter, on Calidonia Road, in Toronto. 

Notwithstandingly, the Fred Victor staff were concerned about me staying at their shelter and also reporting on their activities. Those complaints that had involved me, directly, I had also reported to the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and they all went to Brad Boucher, who had so much sided with the corruption of the Fred Victor shelter staff and management, that he also claimed that he had approved them restricting me from its shelters, for longer than six months. Keep in mind that under the Toronto Shelter Standards, restricting a resident from the use of an emergency shelter for longer than three months, required that the moved be approved by those in the Shelter Support and Housing Administration.  Brad Boucher, then as now, acted corruptly to cover up the actions of the Fred Victor Centre staff, who have acted inappropriately, either towards the residents, or in carrying out their duties, as shelter staff.

Fast forward to today, and Brad Boucher is still saying that the Fred Victor Centre is justified in refusing me any assistance, some five years going on six years down the road, for reporting on them, then and also recently. In his email to me yesterday, he claimed that the Fred Victor Centre staff view my ongoing reports about them as harassment and therefore I am being banned from their shelters. And for what now seem as an indefinite period. The problem with this decision is that it goes against Shelter Standards guidelines.  Unless the resident has made a direct threat, or his behavior is threatening in some ways, (that is could caused physical harm to someone), or has been violent towards the staff, then that resident also have a right to use the services of the housing provider, who is also under contract with the City of Toronto (a corporation).   Exercising one's right to freedom of speech by reporting about the staff's inappropriate conduct, should not be viewed as a harassment of the staff.  Neither should a resident who has made complaints about Fred Victor Centre shelter staff, be considered as harassing the staff, at the time of the complaints, some six years ago.

While it would be considered an uncomfortable situation to be put in, for both the staff and the person who has reported on their actions, the move was also justified, because if they had not put me out in the cold some weeks ago with my animal, because some old restriction was in place, then I would not have reported on them in the media recently. When I was also asked last week by the Manager of the shelter, Marcia Gilmore, to retract the recent article I had written about them, as a prerequisite to her letting me stay at the shelter and I had also refused, I knew that they would also take further reprisal actions against me. For their actions to be condoned by the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and by the housing consultant for the Fred Victor Centre, Brad Boucher, also go against the Shelter Standards Rules and Regulations. One of which is that any restrictions put on a resident, or former resident, can also be temporarily lifted, if the situation, such as weather conditions, is extreme. It may be Authum officially,  but the weather in Toronto, is winter like. That is considered as extreme and no one should be put out in the cold by an emergency shelter, such as Fred Victor, for something that they did years ago, or even for some infringement of the rules based on their current stay at the shelter. To prove that there was more behind the actions of the Fred Victor staff and also those in Shelter Support and Housing Administration, when they were confronted with the evidence of another resident (male) of the Fred Victor shelter, who was in a physical altercation at the same time, with another male resident of the shelter, they did not evict him from the shelter. This happened on the same day that they'd asked me to leave. According to Fred Victor staff, Michael Joseph (who also witnessed the incident at the resident's meeting) and later the Manager, Marcia Gilmore, "each resident's situation is different" and she also added, "we won't discussed another resident's situation with you".

What I believed personally about the actions of the Fred Victor staff, and those in the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, such as Brad Boucher, Natalie Williams, Tamika Givens and the head of that division, Paul Raftis and Gordon Tanner, is that they had all worked in a conspiracy to destabilized me and to make me homeless, as part of the ongoing persecution that I am going through, that is being carried out by the Canadian government. Someone had contacted Fred Victor (it could have been the Manager, Danielle Ashby, as it was later confirmed by a representative of the shelter system, who got that information from Fred Victor staff directly), or it could have been others
involved, whose names and identity, has remained a secret. And that once the Shelter Support and Housing Administration now got involved, to investigate the actions of the shelter, those others in that division, became involved in the conspiracy to put me out in the cold, as well.

And for their actions, I have now added their names to the list of other Canadian government officials, who have acted to carry out the international crime against me, under the Rome Statute, under Crimes Against Humanity, in the International Criminal Court. I cannot mention here how many secret cruel and unusual punishment that government and its officials has carried out against me. I hope to see them all stand before a court one day and answer for their crimes.



Wednesday, October 31, 2018

FRED VICTOR CENTRE, BROKE THE LAW, BY TAKING REPRISAL ACTIONS, AGAINST BLOGGER.

TORONTO SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING EXECUTIVES, TOOK NO ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC, OR TO ENFORCE THE SHELTER STANDARDS ACT, IN THIS CASE. IT CAN BE VIEWED IN TWO WAYS: CULPABILITY (A CRIMINAL ACT) AND COMPLICITY, IN REGARDS TO THEIR ACTIONS. OTHER ACTIONS ON THEIR PART INCLUDED, CONSPIRACY(SPECIFICLLY, THAT THEY HAD CONSPIRED, TO CAUSED FURTHER INJURY TO THIS BLOGGER, BY TAKING NO ACTIONS TO PROTECT HER SAFETY), CORRUPTION AND BREACH OF TRUST.

ANYONE CAN BECOME HOMELESS, FOR VARIOUS REASONS.  WHEN THAT HAPPENS, IT IS ALSO A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE. SHELTERS EXIST TO PROVIDE FOR THE IMMEDIATE NEED, OF THE HOMELESS. TO PUT 
SOMEONE WHO IS HOMELESS, OUT ON THE STREET AND IN THE COLD, WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFIABLE REASONS, OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT A PREVIOUS RESTRICTION WAS STILL IN PLACE, IS NOT A GOOD ENOUGH REASON, TO ENDANGER THE SAFETY OF ANYONE.

FRED VICTOR CENTRE, AS A HOUSING  PROVIDER, THAT IS UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF TORONTO, TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY AND LONG TERM SHELTER SUPPORT, TO THE HOMELESS.  IT HAS BROKEN SHELTER STANDARDS REGULATIONS, BY TELLING A HOMELESS WOMAN THEY HAD PUT OUT IN THE COLD WITH HER ANIMAL, THAT IT WOULD TAKE THEM ANOTHER TWO WEEKS, TO MAKE A DECISION, WHEN OR IF THE WOMAN CAN RETURN TO THE SHELTER. THIS UNUSUAL DELAY IS ALSO AGAINST SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING STANDARDS ACT, FOR RESTRICTIONS THAT DO NOT INCLUDE THE SAETY OF OTHERS, BUT IS BASED ON SOME PREVIOUS ACTIONS, THAT WAS DONE SOME SIX YEARS PREVIOUSLY, THAT ALSO DID NOT INCLUDE ANY THREAT, OR VIOLENCE TO OTHERS.
Marcia Gilmore, a shelter manager, at the Fred Victor Centre
has delayed her response, in making a decision, under Shelter Support
and Housing Regulations, after a homeless woman was put out in
the cold last week with her animal, when she was told that she was
still restricted after six years, from all Fred Victor Centre shelters,
after she had reported (six years ago) in the media about the abuse of
power, and other practices, by Fred Victor Centre's shelter managers
and other staff.


Marcia Gilmore's comment, to this blogger: "Can you take down the article, that you wrote on your blog, about Fred Victor", before giving an answer to the woman, this blogger, concerning the six year restriction, that was put on her by another Fred Victor Centre Manager, Danielle Ashby, back in 2013, after reporting on the actions of Fred Victor's staff. When the blogger said no, that she was obligated to the public and not to the Fred Victor Centre, in regards to what she report on her blog, she was then told by Marcia Gilmore, that she would have to wait, "until  next week", to get an answer from her, if and when she could return to the shelter.
The Blogger had lost her home last week and had gone to the shelter, which is also the only shelter in Toronto, that also takes animals on a long term basis. Aside from the Fred Victor Centre shelters, there are only a few other housing providers, that operate on a drop in basis, that may take animals, on a day to day basis, in regards to their 24 hour respite. With those ones you also have to meet specific criteria as well. Such as Sprott House, a LGBQT, shelter in Toronto that takes animals on a temporary basis. And most of them are also full on any given day.
On the same day that the homeless woman was asked to leave the Fred Victor shelter, located at 545 Lakeshore Blvd. West in Toronto, a fight had broken out between two men at the same shelter and one of them had assaulted the other man, in front of other witnesses. The man who had assaulted the other resident, was not asked to leave the shelter. He was allowed to stay at the shelter by the two staff, who had also witnessed the incident. (The fight had broken out at a resident meeting, where staff was also in attendance). Fred Victor staff, Michael Joseph and Tracy Baker, allowed the man to remained at the shelter, after committing the assault). When that incident was brought up with the manager, Marcia Gilmore, she responded that "each case was different". Not only was that resident not evicted from the Fred Victor shelter, for his violence, but he also did not have to wait two weeks, for an answer from the Fred Victor staff and management, if he could stay at the shelter. If their treatment of residents is based on fairness and equality, then that is also lacking, in regards to their decision in my case. There is also a "conspiracy of silence", in regards to the Shelter Support and Housing, Management, while they continue to ignore the situation. For instance, under the SSHA, a housing provider, is suppose to get the approval from Shelter Support And Housing Administration, first, if they have imposed a restriction on a resident, or former resident, that is longer than 3 months. According to Brad Boucher, Manager at Shelter, Support and Housing, he had "approved the restriction, longer than 6 months", from Fred Victor Centre, in regards to my case, back in 2013, when it was first imposed. When I asked him to provide me with a copy of that document, Brad Boucher, SSHA, has so far refused and has since remained silent on the matter. Other Shelter Support and Housing Administration staff who has also remained silent in regards to this current situation, include the following: Mark Kim, Tamika Givens, Natalie Williams, Milton Berra, who is also acting in place of the Director, Gordon Tanner, (who is back on November 6th) and Paul Raftis, (Interim)General Manager.

A CASE OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
This blogger is adding their names to the list of other Canadian government officials and others who have acted in a conspiracy with those officials, to violate her human right and to cause her harm, with the International Criminal Court. As a part of that process, the victim and this blogger, can also add any new evidence to the process, which has started before this incident, had occurred and at any stage in the proceedings before that court. As I have officially been contacted by the Office of the Prosecutor of the I.C.C. and my case also officially acknowledged by the I.C.C. and is still in the "Preliminary Stage", which do not have a specific timeline, but could proceed as long as there is additional evidence that is needed by the International Criminal Court, to proceed with my matter before that court, I will continue to provide new evidence to that court, in regards to the crimes that have been committed against me, by those officials, under the Rome Statute, Article 7, in regards to Crimes Against Humanity, against me.   




















Monday, October 29, 2018

PROCEEDING, IN THE INTERNTIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.


THERE WILL BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, WITH A CANADIAN JUDGE PRESIDING OVER CASES, THAT ARE CURRENTLY BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CIMINAL COURT.  WHICH  HAS ALSO IMPLICATED THAT COUNTRY, IN CRIMES COMMITTED, UNDER ROME STATUTE.                                                                                                                                                                                               

Unfortunately, she got in. All six judges are there to re-enforced, the UN's
New World Order, in regard to their decisions. Leading towards a one
world government and jurisprudence. Do you honestly believed, that
the countries of Africa, are the only ones committing those crimes,
which are outlined in the Rome Statute?. Conveniently absent from prosecutions
 are the countries of Canada and the USA, as well as Israel, Russia, China and
the countries of the Middle East. All of which are prone to committing gross
human rights violations. 


A Canadian judge, with high hopes of becoming a judge of the International
Criminal Court. Unfortunately, this one also got in and is now a part of that
court. In fact, Canada is both a defendant (it's officials) before the I.C.C,
as well as being a part of the prosecution team, as a presiding judge.
















BUILDING A CASE BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THROUGH PERSISTENCE, KNOWLEDGE, SKILL AND DEDICATION. AND WITH FORE KNOWLEGE OR FORESIGHT. 

One of the more interesting things about the I.C.C. is that there is no statue of limitations, as to how far back one can go, to initiate a criminal proceeding against individuals of a State, that has ratified its treaty with the I.C.C. Likewise, there is no timelines provided in the Statue either, for when a preliminary examination may be completed by the Prosecutor. Since it is an ongoing process in gathering the necessary evidence needed to bring the case together, or to established if there is sufficient evidence, for a case and to proceed to trial, then the victim of those crimes and their legal team can use that time to bring additional evidence before the Prosecutor, adding to the information  that they already have concerning the criminal charges, that are before the court. New evidence and new witnesses can be added along the way. Which brings me to the point that I am trying to make here. That of adding more names to the list of individuals, who has committed those atrocities against me, under the Rome Statute and consisting of Crimes Against Humanity. The list against those Canadian officials, representing both the government and non-governmental organizations, that has worked together with that government, to carry out those crimes against me, that falls under that section of the Rome Statute. 

It should also make them very nervous, since I am also determined to proceed, in the International Criminal Court against them. It is a long process and especially for someone like me who is also determined to win. If the Prosecutor need a bit of a prod to continue with the proceedings before the I.C.C, then that is what will happen. And what better way to continue with the proceeding before the court, than to provide new evidence to the court on the crimes that were and continue to be committed against me by Canadian government officials. And with impunity. That is also where the I.C.C. come in. It claim that its role is to destroy the impunity that most government officials enjoy, at the expense of the victims of their alleged crimes. All of which happen to fall under the Rome Statute and the jurisdiction of the I.C.C. And just because you bring a case before the I.C.C. also do not mean that the I.C.C. is also particularly interested in investigating it, or in bringing those responsible for committing those crimes against you to trial. It is not interested in any of that. I am of the opinion that the I.C.C. has its own agenda that is also inextricably tied to the UN's and that both of them do not necessarily represent the interest of justice, or of stopping those crimes that are committed by those States. Some think that it is all a show and that the I.C.C. is not really that serious in prosecuting any State officials per say, only in appearing to do so. Which brings me to another important point. That is, on the I.C.C's relationship with some of those countries, or States and the conflict of interest that it also create when bringing those State officials before the I.C.C. for prosecution.  I am talking about countries like Canada, and especially with the appointment of a Canadian judge Kimberly Prost, as one of the six new judges that are now presiding over that court. Some may find it hard to believe that Canada is also guilty of some of the worst kinds of human rights abuse, such as Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and even Crimes of Aggression. Can we get an impartial ruling from the I.C.C, with a Canadian judge sitting as a trial judge to its hearings?. I do not think so.
Particularly relevant to this article, is the Crimes Against Humanity ATTROCITIES, which it has committed against me and which is no laughing matter. Though it may appear to be humorous to those Canadian government officials who are also carrying this out against me. Continuing to amuse me, all the way to a conviction. Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda and the I.C.C cannot tell me that I do not have a case either, before the I.C.C. Not with the abundance of evidence that I have presented here on my Blog and elsewhere. Such as the overwhelming evidence that exist in regards to my matters before the Canadian courts, over the years.  Unrefuted evidence, that shows a continuous effort by that government, to abuse my human rights. 

SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING ADMINISTRATION: THE CONSPIRACY TO DENY HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, ACCESS TO EMERGENCY HOUSING AND SHELTER.

HOW CANADA CARRIES OUT TORURE AND OTHER CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS, AGAINST BLOGGER.

NEW:  CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO BE CHARGED IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CARRYING OUT CRIMES AND OTHER HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, AGAINST BLOGGER.
THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO BE CHARGED IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

Shelter, Support and Housing Division:  Gord Tanner, Director
                                                                  Paul Raftis, General Manager
                                                                  Milton Berrera
                                                                  Brad Boucher
                                                                  Mark Kim
                                                                  Natalie Williams
                                                                  Tamika Given
Housing Provider:  Fred Victor Centre
Staff: Mark Aston, Mandy Aston, Daniela Ashby, Tracy Baker, Michael Joseph.
Charges against agency: racism, failing to carry out and to implement the rules, regulations and guildelines, under the SSHA, in regards to the victim.                                                                                                                                                                        
All of them has blocked the victim from getting any immediate shelter, or housing, under their emergency program and then forced the victim out in the cold.

lied on behalf of the housing provider to the detriment of the victim

acted in a conspiracy to deny the victim assistance in getting immediate help and to provide her with temporary emergency housing or shelter.

acted corruptly to obstruct justice

openly mocked the victim

THE VICTIM HAS ASKED THE, UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, TO INTERVENED
ON HER BEHALF.

IT HAS HAPPENED AGAIN!  Canadian government officials, acting in a conspiracy to cause serious injury to Blogger, by denying her access to emergency shelter.
Anyone can lose their housing and for various reasons. But when Blogger, Valerie Guillaume lost her residence last week and went to one of the emergency centers in Toronto, she was forced out on the street in the cold, after the Manager at the shelter, Daniela Ashby, told the frontline staff, to evict the blogger, based on a restriction that was put in place by the service provider, Fred Victor Centre, some  six  years ago, after the Blogger reported to the public on Fred Victor's lack of regards for the homeless people and their animals at the shelter. One of the reports that the Blogger had made against Fred Victor Centre, showed two staff playing pool, while no one remained in the office to take telephone calls, from perspective clients.  Her other report touched upon the gross abuse of power by the staff and management, such as Daniela Ashby, who is a senior manager with Fred Victor Centre.


This should not be happening and it is also a very unusual case. Unusual in that most people do not get to experience this kind of treatment, unless you're a target and a persecuted individual like this blogger, who was denied emergency housing and shelter. Further, she alleges that those in the SSHA blocked her efforts in getting emergency shelter, by ignoring her request and by minimisizing the severity of the situation,after reprisal actions were taken against her, by the housing provider Fred Victor Centre, after complaing about staff conduct, resulting in a restriction put on her by the housing provider, six years ago, that now seem indefinite.

Friday, October 12, 2018

RACIST T.O. CITY OFFICIALS, BEGS BLOGGER TO RECANT STORY, TO SAVE THEIR REPUTATION.

THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY'S BOARD CHAIR AND ITS MANAGEMENT STAFF, ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR REPUTATION, AFTER BEING LABELED AS BEING RACIST, AND FOLLOWING A SYSTEMATICALY RACIST POLICY, THROUGH THE TPL'S POLICY OF TREATING BLACK AUTHORS, WRITERS AND OTHER LITERARY AGENTS DIFFERENTLY, REGARDING ITS SERVICES.


DISRESPECTING ONE PERSON BASED ON THEIR RACE, IS THE SAME AS DISRESPECTING, A GROUP OF PERSONS OF THE SAME RACE. AND IN THE CASE OF THE TPL, IT IS ONE TOO MANY CASES , LEADING TO CHARGES OF RACISM, AGAINST ITS MANAGEMENT STAFF AND BOARD.



City of Toronto Librarian, Vickery Bowles, Susan Caron, Acting Director, of the Toronto Public Library and Michele Melady, Manager of Acquisitions and Collections, as well as Sue Graham-Nutter, Chair for the TPL and Strahan McCarten, Vice Chair, are all concerned about their reputations, after being exposed as following a racist policy of the Toronto Public Library.




To this I say: When reporting on the truth in Canada, one is also protected from prosecution and from also being sued. The ugly truth of racism is all to prevalent and that it has now become a normal way of thinking by some (like yourself) and also of treating certain persons, or groups of people living in Canada, differently and to a way that also fundamentally infringes upon their rights, under Canadian law.  And to which the Toronto Public Library, through its policies, most notably implemented by its Management Staff and its Board's Chair and Vice Chair, are also guilty of. Through my own personal experiences and through my research, I have come upon this truth and have also exposed it. And that


the audacity that you have shown in trying to hide and to cover up your corruption, despite the fact that you are also accountable to the public, which has appointed you to the present position that you now occupy, shows that you are also incorrigible and beyond redemption. And that the best response would be, to have you removed from your public position. And I also say further that: "When you want others to accept your corrupt behaviour as normal, then it is time to vacate your position, as the City Librarian, Board Chair, or Vice-Chair and as a publicly appointed person"












"The fact that you want the public to buy your bullshit, and to accept your dishonesty, shows the level of your corruption". Do not act corrupt and think that you can also hide behind your positions, because you will be exposed. Racism is a harmful thing to be experienced for some members of this
society, which you also do not seem to acknowledged, or accept. So I have made a list of "Do's and Don'ts" which may help you to understand. You must also live by these tenets while occupying your public positions:






1."I will treat all persons the same, regardless of race, class, creed, or religious background.
2. "I will be transparent, while occupying this public position.
3. "I will not betray the public's trust in my office"
4."If I do, I expect to pay for my mistake, with a full disclosure and removal from my position".
5"I will not act to pervert justice, or break the law to cover up my actions".
7."I will at all times make myself available to the public while occupying this job".
 8. "I will not dishonor my office and position".
9. "I will not act corrupt".
10."I will expect to be judged by my actions, and not seek to keep my office, if I screw up"


On October 11, 2018, the Toronto Public Library's Children Books Selection Committee, allegedly met to decide if the TPL, was going to purchased the 5 children books from Author and Blogger Valerie Guillaume, based on the contents of those books. And as part of its ongoing racist attitudes towards the Author/Blogger, she was also not contacted by the TPL's Management Staff, about the decision of her books, since that meeting. Further, the Toronto Public Library's Management Staff, such as Vickery Bowles, Susan Caron, Michele Melady and its Board Chair, Sue Graham-Nutter and Vice Chair, Strahan McCarten, has also personally acted dastardly and unprofessional towards the Author/Blogger and her publishing company, and in a manner that is so disrespectful, and full of contempt, that it also infringes on her rights legally. A person's dignity and self-respect are also protected under Canadian Law and those staff of the TPL's Management and its Board, do not seem to be aware of this. Or seem to care to apply it to certain persons whom they feel, should not have come up against them.




On the verge of making a decision, (so they claimed) over the Author's children books, the Toronto Public Library's Management Staff, then contacted the Author, to retract her statements about them and the TPL, or to face a defamation lawsuit, as they felt that the exposure given to the TPL by the blogger, also negatively reflected on them personally. Well!, what do I care, if it is also based on the truth?. It would appear that their motive for contacting the Author, on the eve of deciding on her books to the Toronto Public Library's collections, was to "strike up a bargain" with the Author/Blogger, which goes something like this. "Take down your articles about us and we may buy your books". "If not...what?". Well, since it is now October 12th and the Author/Blogger also did not get a response from the TPL's Management Staff, over the purchase of those books, then perhaps they did go ahead and implemented that threat, (whether implied or not) against the Author/Blogger, in acquiring those books, or not. At any rate, the TPL's Management Staff, will face a lawsuit over their decisions, concerning the Author/Blogger. The Author/Blogger will be claiming in that lawsuit that the TPL's Management Staff, violated her rights under the Human Rights Code and other sections of the law, in their treatment of the Author. And that they also specifically and intentionally caused injury to her dignity and self respect, among other tortious actions on the part of those TPL's staff and Board members. The Author/Blogger will also be suing the TPL for tort and not just for injury, but also for economic tort, and especially against her business, in regards to the Toronto Public Library's policy of systematic racism, not to mention the personal racism of its Management Staff and Board against the Author/Blogger, that has caused her harm. And that those actions were also intentionally inflicted upon the Author/Blogger, to caused her serious injury. Both to herself and to her business.



























Thursday, October 11, 2018

CANADA, RELENTLESSLY PERSECUTE, HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER: VALERIE GUILLAUME.

CONFRONTING STATE TERROR: MY LIFE AS A PERSECUTED BLOGGER, LIVING IN CANADA.  This is the title of a book by human rights blogger and author, Valerie Guillaume, that is based entirely on facts, relating to the many years of being tortured and subjected to cruel and vicious attacks by Canadian authorities, all acting in one accord, to silence her. 

HERE IN THE AUTHOR'S OWN WORDS ARE SOME OF THE ATTROCITIES THAT ARE BEING COMMITTED AGAINST THE HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, STILL AND UNDER THE VERY NOSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS, WHO ALL BECAME A PARTNER WITH CANADA, IN COMMITTING THOSE CRIMES AGAINST HER.




CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, HAS QUIETLY CARRIED OUT THE PERSECUTION, OF HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, VALERIE GUILLAUME, UNABATED FOR YEARS.


"I am subjected to 24 hours surveillance, so severe and unrelenting in its scope, that I am striped of every human dignity, in the process. Aside from employing agents to spy on me, the Canadian authorities also follow me in marked cars, some of them saying "security" on the sides of the car. Other times I am watched by police cars that would be parked in the very area that I usually take every day. They know my routine and would watch me constantly. The worst of the surveillance by Canadian authorities, is in using hidden cameras to watch me. I know this is so because, it would have been impossible otherwise for them to know exactly when I leave, or return and to park themselves just across the street, and to watch me come and go. Even when I switched up my routine,
I can never seem to shake their physical presence, as the police, or CSIS and others, carry out those surveillance of me. To say that it is also harassing in nature, would be an understatement.


"People have no idea what I go through on a daily basis". "It is beyond human endurance and because I have been able to endure it, they don't seem to want to stop their crimes against me".


"They also forced me repeatedly from my home, causing me to become homeless and if anyone offers to assist me with housing, they also influence them not to".  "Homelessness is a very useful tactic of the Canadian police and other authorities against me".  The Canadian police has repeatedly illegally evicted me from my home, on behalf of landlords. All of whom have also been agents for the police. To try and get some remedy of the court, when this is caused by others acting on behalf of the Canadian authorities, is also that is blocked by the courts.


"The Canadian government and its officials, has waged a war of attrition against me, in order to break my spirit". The elements of this attack involved both psychological and physical torture against me." And I am expected to endure it indefinitely, or to "crack". "So far I have proven to be a tough opponent to beat and the Canadian authorities also knows this". "Anyone else would have succumb by now, to those attacks, by the Canadian government, against them".


"Character assassination by Canadian authorities, is also a very effective tactic, that is used constantly against me". "It is used to gain the trust of those who would eventually betray me to the Canadian government, by becoming agents of the Canadian authorities against me". "This group of traitors included those who has access to me, including so called friends and acquaintances, family members and those strangers who are willing to become a hired agent for the Canadian government".


"It has become clear to the Canadian authorities, that I do have some power and influence through my Blog and this also causes them to persecute me, relentlessly because of this fact". "As with other countries that persecute bloggers, who are critical of the governments, Canada does the same thing with me, only it carries out its attacks against me, both covertly and overtly. And also mocking me in the process, because no one has stepped in to say, "enough, you are in violation of international laws concerning this blogger". "Canada has been able to sabotage my efforts, in getting international help, for its human rights abuse against me".


"However, mine is not a lost cause, as my case against Canadian government officials that is also currently before the International Criminal Court, with more Canadian officials to be added to that list, shows that I can and will fight back, and that I believe also that they will be brought to justice for their crimes against me".


"Last night several cars were trailing me and making it known that I was also being watched". "The first of those cars was parked directly opposite where they thought I would be and I was there". "As soon as its occupant saw me, he drove off". "The second car also was parked at a strategic location, where I have to past and it was marked "security". "Sometimes they also used minivans with occupants wearing dark glasses and staring directly at me". "If I go too close to the minivan, or the cars that they often used, including the ones that says "Security", or a marked police cruiser, they always drive off, or the occupant would lower his head and pretends to be reading or listening to something". "At no time do the occupants of those vehicles makes eye contact with me". "Almost every day, I would walk up to one of those vehicles and they would immediately drive off". "Worst, if they see me taking out my phone to record them, they have shown to be extremely fearful of any kind of video recordings of them, or their activities".


"There is a difference in being a targeted individual and being a target of the government because of one's activities to exposed that government's corruption and other actions that leads to human rights violations, under international human rights laws". It means that the scope of the targeting is more sophisticated and deadly in its application, against such targets as myself".


"CANADA HAS BLOOD ON ITS HANDS. NOT JUST THE BLOOD OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE, BUT ALSO OF MODERN DAY VICTIMS OF ITS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES, INCLUDING BLOGGERS SUCH AS MYSELF".




'CANADA SHOULD DEFINITELY BE ON THE SAME LIST AS THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT PERSECUTE HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGERS, BECAUSE OF ITS ONGOING PERSECUTION OF ME AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN OPENLY CRITICAL OF ITS HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD".



Tuesday, October 2, 2018

VICKERY BOWLES, SUSAN CARON, SUE GRAHAM-NUTTER, STRAHAN McCARTEN, MICHELE MELADY, OF THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, ALL HAVE CONSPIRED TO BLOCK MY BOOKS., BECAUSE THE DO NOT WANT TO PAY THE SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT FOR THOSE BOOKS.

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND MY CLAIM AGAINST CANADA. MORE CORRECTLY, AGAINST PERSONS WHO ARE A PART OF THAT COUNTRY'S GOVERNMENT AND WHO HAS USED THEIR INFLUENCE AND POWER, TO CARRY OUT ATTROCITIES AGAINST ME. AS PART OF THE ONGOING TARGETING OF ME, BY THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT. 


A RECENT EXAMPLE IF THIS CONSPIRACY TO BLOCK ME, INVOLVED THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY AND ITS MANAGEMENT AND BOARD CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR.






Vickery Bowles: City Librarian, Toronto Public Library
Susan Caron: Acting Director
Michele Melady: Acquisition and Collection
Sue-Graham-Nutter: Chair
Strahan McCarten: Vice-Chair




Part of the job of being publicly appointed, is show respect for the position that you hold and also when dealing with the public. However, I have come up against a conspiracy, by those persons of the Toronto Public Library, that I have just mentioned, that is so repugnant and outright unlawful, that it is my public duty to exposed them and to educate the public concerning them.  They are very corrupt individuals who are hiding behind the fa├žade, of  being mindful of others differences, but who in fact has a secret agenda, to do the contrary.


I plan to talk very openly about their actions, until the public get sick of hearing it. I plan to use every medium available to discuss their corruption openly and to force them out of their position. I plan to exposed the truth about them and how they act in secret when they think that no one will ever find out about their actions. The first mistake that they made, was in disrespecting me. I am still waiting to hear back from Vickery Bowles, Michele Melady, Sue Graham-Nutter, Strahan McCarten and Susan Caron, about what they decide about my being in the library. 


You see, they do not want to purchase the books, and for one reason only. They do not want to pay me the kind of money that they think would be too much for someone like me. An we are talking about not a lot of money, but a few bucks, when compared to the Toronto Public Library's annual budget, most of which comes from Toronto City Council and from public donors. If they pay me, it would interfere with their bigger plan to try and ruin me financially. This is what the conspiracy is all about. So these TPL Management Staff and its Board Chair, Sue Graham_Nutter an Vice-Chair, Strahan McCarten, have decided to do the following things. To ignore all things concerning me. That includes not responding to my emails about the date of the Children Books Selection Committee, which meets every two weeks and who should be the ones making the decision on the merits of the books.


They chose to carry out a "conspiracy of silence" and to disrespect me, in the process. Well, that is a direct attack on my dignity and self respect and are also grounds under the Human Rights Code, for a lawsuit against The Toronto Public Library and its Management Staff.


They were happy when I wanted to withdraw the books from being reviewed by the selection committee, because of how they had treated me and because they did not want to purchase my books anyway. I knew that and recanted my earlier statement and asked them to forward the books to the committee. What I have met from them since, is a "wall of silence". They feel that by ignoring my request, that I would be so angry, that I would withdraw the books, from the selection process. Neither Vickery Bowles, City Librarian, nor Sue Graham-Nutter, Board Chair, and Strahan McCarten, Vice Chair, has chosen to get back to me on that. Sue Graham-Nutter has sent me one email, that she (not the Board) was going to investigate the actions of those TPL staff mentioned.


When I made further inquiries into the matter, she refused to follow up my requests and to respond, either by telephone, or email. Strahan McCarten also did like wise. Vickery Bowles, was just pissed off that I wrote about her actions on my Blog and so she did not respond either.
So just to get information on when the selection committee would be reviewing the books has been an arduous ordeal for me. This matter is far from being closed at this time. Aside from legal actions against the Toronto Public Library and its Management Staff, Vickery Blowles, City Librarian, Susan Caron, Manager of Collections, Michele Melady, Acquisitions and Collections, and Sue Graham-Nutter, Chair and Strahan McCarten Vice_Chair, these corrupt, depraved (of any morality) and nefarious (as in evil) persons, must also answer to the public over their actions as well.





Tuesday, August 21, 2018

THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, IS FACING A LAWSUIT, OVER RACISM.


THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, IS NOTORIOUSLY KNOWN, FOR EXCLUDING, THE WORKS OF BLACK AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, IN ITS COLLECTIONS. THE PROBLEM LIES WITH THE TPL'S RACISM,  IN NOT RECOGNIZING THE RICHNESS AND DIVERSITY OF TALENTS, AMONG AFRO CANADIAN WRITERS. 



Vickery Bowles, City Librarian.
The systematic racism of her staff and other librarians
has now landed the Toronto Public library, in some
hot water. Her lack of direct answer to why there are
so few books, in the TPL, by Afro Canadian writers and
Publishers, seem to point to the most obvious answer,
as well. That the lack of children books, especially, by
Black authors, in regards to the TPL, has a direct
correlation to the racism, aimed against Blacks
in Canadian society.




HERE IS ABSOLUTE PROOF, THAT THE VICKERY BOWLES IS A RACIST:  THE CITY'S LIBRARIAN, VICKERY BOWLES, GAVE HER CONSENT TO HAVE THE RACIST WHITE NATIONALISTS, USE THE
TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, (SHOULD THEY NEED TO), TO GIVE VENOM TO THEIR HATE SPEECHES. BOWLES, ALSO, OBJECTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, BANNING THE RACIST GROUP, THE TORONTO NATIONALIST, FROM HAVING A RALLY, ON ITS DOWNTOWN CAMPUS. ACCORDING TO VICKERY BOWLES, "The library cannot deny access to people, based on their views and opinions...". FIRST OF ALL, HATE SPEECH, IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW ITSELF. SECONDLY, VICKERY BOWLES, AS THE CITY LIBRARIAN, FOR TORONTO, REPRESENTS THE PUBLIC. THAT MEANS ALL OF THOSE GROUPS, THAT THE WHITE NATIONALISTS  HATES. HOW CAN THE HEAD LIBRARIAN, FOR A MAJOR NORTH AMERICAN CITY, BE SO CARELESS IN HER SPEECH?. UNLESS, SHE ALSO SHARES THOSE SAME VIEWS. DO YOU THINK THAT SHE WOULD SAY THE SAME THING, ABOUT THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD? WHETHER IT IS THE CITY LIBRARIAN, OR THE TTC (TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION), RACISM IS OFTEN PROMOTED, BY THESE CITY DIVISIONS,
AS IF CERTAIN GROUPS OF PEOPLE, STILL HAS TO FIGHT FOR THEIR PLACE,
 IN THIS SOCIETY.




THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY AND ITS STAFF'S RACIST ATTITUDE HAVE NOW RESULTED IN A LAWSUIT, AIMED AT THE LIBRARY. THE LAWSUIT IS BEING FILED ON BEHALF OF DAFFODIL PRESS PUBLISHING COMPANY, WHICHIS ALSO OWNED BY WRITER VAL GUILLAUME, WHEN THE TPL REFUSED TO INCLUDE BOOKS PUBLISHED BY THE SMALL PRESS, IN ITS LIBRARY COLLECTIONS. TO FURTHER MAKE A CASE  AGAINST THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, IT IS ALSO ACCUSED OF MAKING A DECISION TO EXCLUDE THE CHILDREN BOOKS, FOR ITS KIDSPACE ONLINE PROGRAM AND FOR OTHER GENERAL USE, AMONG ITS 100 BRANCHES ACROSS THE CITY,BECAUSE OF ITS STAFF'S PERSONAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE AUTHOR, HER PUBLISHING COMPANY, THAT SHE HAS CLAIMED, IS AN ATTACK AGAINST HER PERSONALLY AND WAS ALSO INTENDED, TO BLOCK HER PUBLISHING COMPANY, FROM CONDUCTING ANY BUSINESS WITH THE TPL, THAT WOULD ALSO GENERATE ANY FINACIAL GAIN, FOR EITHER HER, OR HER PUBLISHING COMPANY. THE AUTHOR IS SUING THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR DAMAGES AND FOR TORT, CLAIMING THAT IT ALSO DISCRIMINATED AGAINST HER, AS A PUBLICLY FUNDED AGENCY OF THE GOVERNMENT (THE TPL RECIEVES OVER 90% OF ITS FUNDING, FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT, THE CITY OF TORONTO). THE AUTHOR AND PUBLISHER ALSO HOLDS THE AGENCY'S STAFF RESPONSIBLE, FOR SUBJECTING HER TO UNWARRANTED RACISM, IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY. SHE IS CLAIMING DAMAGES IN THE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, FOR INJURY SUFFERED AS A RESULT OF THE ACTIONS OF THE TPL AND ITS MANAGEMENT STAFF. MOST NOTABLY, AS A CO-DEFENDANT IN THE CLAIM ARE THE FOLLOWING TPL MANAGEMENT STAFF, MICHELE MELADY, SUSAN CARON AND VICKERY BOWLES.


WITH AN ANNUAL BUDGET, OF OVER 200 MILLION DOLLARS.  AND ITS BUDGET FOR 2018, IS $201,606,802.00. THE TPL'S 2017 BUDGET WAS JUST UNDER 200 MILLION DOLLARS. MOST OF WHICH GOES TOWARDS THE SALARIES OF ITS EMPLOYEES. YET, AT LEAST 20 MILLION DOLLARS OF THAT, OR ABOUT 9% GOES TOWARDS ACQUIRING MATERIALS FOR THE LIBRARY. THE PROBLEM LIES IN THE FACT, THAT MOST OF THAT BUDGET, IS ALSO SPENT ON FOREIGN TALENTS. BOTH FOREIGN AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, GETS PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE MATERIALS FROM BOTH ARE ROUTINELY PURCHASED, BY THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY. ONLY WHAT IS LEFT OVER FROM THAT, IS SPENT ON CANADIAN AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS. AND JUST A FRACTION OF THAT IS SPENT ON LOCAL, OR REGIONAL WRITERS AND PUBLISHERS, MUCH LESS ON AFRO CANADIAN AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS.




THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF SYSTEMATICALLY, DISCRIMINATING, AGAINST BLACK AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS.  BY REFUSING TO INCLUDE THEIR BOOKS IN ITS, LITERARY COLLECTIONS. ONE SUCH WRITER AND PUBLISHER, HAS  ALSO DECIDED TO TAKE THE TPL TO COURT, OVER ITS RACIST ACTIONS. THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY AND ITS STAFF'S RACIST ATTITUDE HAVE NOW RESULTED IN A LAWSUIT, AIMED AT THE LIBRARY.



LOCAL BLACK TALENTS FOR INSTANCE, HAVE  ROUTINELY BEEN DENIED ACCESS TO HAVING THEIR WORKS, IN THE LIBRARY.  THE TPL CITES THAT IT LACKS THE BUDGET, TO ACCOMMODATE ALL OF THOSE BLACK LITERARY WRITERS AND THEIR WORKS. THE IS THAT THE TPL HAS A BUDGET OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, WHICH IT HAS SPENT ON MOSTLY AQUIRING THE WORKS OF FOREIGN AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS. WHEN IT COMES TO CANADIAN AUTHORS AND GETTING THEIR BOOKS INTO THE  FACT TPL, FOREIGN AUTHORS STANDS A MUCH BETTER CHANCE, OF HAVING THEIR BOOKS IN THE TPL LIBRARY SYSTEMS, THAN AFRO CANADIAN WRITERS AND PUBLISHERS. YOU HAVE TO ASK WHY THIS IS THE POLICY, AND WHY NO ONE HAS CHALLENGE IT SO FAR,UNTIL NOW?.




UNLESS YOU ARE A DEONNE BRAND, OR AN AUSTIN CLARKE, TO NAME A JUST A FEW, OF THE MORE PROMINENT BLACK AUTHORS, YOU WILL NOT GET TO SEE YOUR LITERARY WORKS, INCLUDED IN THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY. THERE IS A VAST AMOUNT OF TALENT, AMONG BLACK WRITERS IN CANADA, YET THE VAST MAJORITY OF THEM, WILL NEVER SEE THEIR WORKS INCLUDED, IN THE TPL'S COLLECTION OF LITERARY WORKS. I WAS KIND OF LUCKY, I SUPPOSED,  AT ONE POINT, TO GET THAT LIBRARY TO INCLUDE, ONE OF MY PREVIOUS BOOKS, IN THE LIBRARY. SUSAN CARON, ONE OF THE MANAGERS AT TPL, IN CHARGED OF PURCHASING BOOKS FOR THE LIBRAY, HAD DENIED THE BOOK, INITIALLY, (AND SHE HAS DONE THE SAME THING IN REGARDS TO MY CHILDREN BOOKS BACK IN 2014. THE BOOK WAS EVENTUALLY PURCHASED FOR THE LIBRARY, FOR ITS SPECIAL BLACK AND WEST INDIAN COLLECTION.  WHICH ARE LOCATED IN ONLY FIVE LIBRARIES BRANCHES, IN THE CITY OF TORONTO. GETTING THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, OVER THE YEARS TO INCLUDE OTHER BOOKS BY ME, HAS NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL. BACK IN 2014, IT OUTRIGHT REFUSED TO INCLUDE ANY OF MY CHILDREN BOOKS, IN ITS LIBRARY COLLECTIONS. IN 2018, WITH ABOUT EIGHT NEW TITLES, I WAS TOLD THAT THE TPL, WOULD STILL NOT INCLUDE ANY OF MY CHILDREN BOOKS, IN THE LIBRARY. THIS MADE ME REALLY ANGRY, AND FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS. FIRST OF ALL THE BOOKS ARE VERY GOOD. AND THIS IS BASED ENTIRELY ON THE REVIEWS, THAT I HAVE ALSO GOTTEN FOR THOSE BOOKS, BY THE PUBLIC. SECONDLY, THERE IS A NEED FOR THOSE CHILDREN BOOKS BY BLACK AUTHORS, LIKE MYSELF, BECAUSE IT ALSO MEET THE NEEDS OF A COMMUNITY, THAT SEE ALMOST NO REPRESENTATION, IN THE KINDS OF BOOKS THAT THE TPL HAS, FOR BLACK CHILDREN, IN ITS LIBRARIES. I HAVE SEEN, EVEN THIS PAST SUMMER, THAT CHILDREN BOOKS BY BLACK AUTHORS, WHO ARE ALMOST ALL AMERICAN WRITERS, WERE ALSO BEING GETTING RID OF BY THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, THROUGH ITS BOOK SALES. THE AMESBURY PARK BRANCH, FOR INSTANCE, HAD A BOOK SALE THIS PAST SUMMER AND THERE WERE DOZENS OF CHILDREN BOOKS, BY AFRICAN AMERICAN BLACK AUTHORS, THAT WERE BEING THROWN OUT BY THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY. I HAVE ALSO SEEN THIS TREND AT OTHER LIBRARY BRANCHES ACROSS THE CITY.  WHEN ASKED ( BY ME, OF COURSE), WHY THE LIBRARY WAS GETTING RID OF ALL OF THOSE CHILDREN BOOKS BY BLACK AUTHORS (AFRO AMERICAN AUTHORS), THE ANSWER WAS BECAUSE "NO ONE WAS BORROWING THOSE BOOS). I FOUND THAT TO BE A FILMSY EXCUSE ON THE PART OF THE TPL TO GET RID OF THOSE CHILDREN BOOKS,BY BLACK AUTHORS. IT WAS BAD ENOUGH THAT AFRO CANADIAN CHILDREN BOOK AUTHORS, ESPECIALLY, COULD ALSO NOT GET THEIR CHILDREN BOOKS, INTO THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARIES. ONE BLACK AUTHOR THAT I KNOW PERSONALLY AND HAVE ALWAYS ENCOURAGED HER TO GET HER (ALREADY PUBLISHED, CHILDREN BOOKS) INTO THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, TOLD ME THAT SHE GAVE UP ON THE EFFORT OF TRYING TO DO SO. SHE TOLD ME THAT HER CHILDREN BOOKS WERE ACCEPTED IN ANOTHER LIBRARY SYSTEM, IN ANOTHER CITY AND THAT WAS GOOD ENOUGH FOR HER. SHE DID NOT BELIEVE IN FIGHTING WITH THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, IN TRYING TO GET HER CHILDREN BOOKS, INTO THE LIBRARY. THIS WAS UNFORTUNATE, FOR THE BLACK COMMUNITY (AND OTHERS), BECAUSE HER CHILDREN BOOKS, ARE ALSO VERY GOOD. JUDGIN ALSO, BY THE PUBLIC RECOGNITIONS, THAT SHE HAS ALSO GOTTEN FOR THEM. I, ON THE OTHER HAND, CHOSE NOT TO GIVE UP SO QUICKLY, NOR WAS I PLEASED AT THE OPEN RACISM, THAT IS A COMMON PRACTICE, AGAINST BLACK AUTHORS AND WRITERS IN GENERAL, BY THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY. BESIDES, IT ALSO HURTS A WRITER FINANCIALLY, AND WHENEVER THAT IS THE CASE, THEN YOU CAN ALWAYS GO AFTER THE SOURCE LEGALLY, FOR DISCRIMINATION IN SERVICES AND FOR OTHER DAMAGES. IN THIS CASE, NOT ONLY WAS THE TPL'S ACTIONS AIMED AGAINST ME PERSONALLY, (WHICH I WILL NOT TRY TO PROVE HERE), BUT IT WAS ALSO INTENDED, TO PREVENT MY PUBLISHING COMPANY, FROM HAVING A FOOTHOLD, IN THE VERY LUCRATIVE BOOK PUBLISHING INDUSTRY. ONE THAT IS ALSO FULL OF RACISM AND BIAS. THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY'S, MAJOR SUPPLIERS OF BOOKS FOR THE LIBRARY, ARE ALL WHITE AND FOR THE MOST PART, FOREIGN OWNED COMPANIES, LIKE OVERDRIVE, FOR ITS AUDIO AND OTHER BOOKS. FOR ACQUIRING CANADIAN BOOKS, IT PREFERS TO GO THROUGH ITS WHOLESALER (A WHITE OWNED COMPANY), AS MOST OF THEM ARE ANYWAYS. LEFT OUT OF THIS MULTIMILLION DOLLAR BUSINESS DEALS, WITH THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, ARE THE SMALL PRESSES. PARTICULARLY, THOSE OWNED BY BLACKS. THERE ARE FEW OF THEM AROUND TODAY, AND NONE OF THEM HAVE EVEN A DECENT CHANCE, OF GETTING THE MAJORITY OF THEIR BOOKS, INTO THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY.  ONE SHOULD VIEW THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, AS NO DIFFERENT FROM ANY OTHER CITY DIVISION, WHEN IT COMES TO BIDDING FOR THEIR LUCRATIVE CONTRACTS. THE TPL OPERATES THE SAME EXACT WAY. (IT'S A WHITES ONLY THING). AND IT'S ALSO ABOUT THE BIG SHARKS, SWALLOWING UP THE SMALL FISHES. MORE THAN THAT IT IS ALSO ABOUT MAINTAINING A SYSTEM THAT IS ALSO INHERENTLY UNFAIR.




Susan Caron, Manager of the Collections Development
Division, with the Toronto Public Library. She is a
key figure, in who gets to have their books, included
in the Toronto Public Library's collections. Along with
other Managers, such as Michele Melady, Caron has
been accused, of outright racism and other
discriminatory practices, against visible minorities
and in getting their book, into the TPL systems.


IT IS A WELL KNOWN FACT AMONG CANADIAN TALENTS, THAT THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, HAS A POLICY AGAINST INCLUDING THE WORKS OF AFRICAN CANADIAN WRITERS AND SOME OF THE SMALL PRESS BLACK PUBLISHING COMPANIES, OUT OF THE LIBRARY'S LITERARY COLLECTIONS. ALTHOUGH IT HAS A FEW SPECIFIC COLLECTION OF BOOKS, THAT ARE INTENDED FOR THE BLACK COMMUNITY, SUCH AS THE RITA COX COLLECTION, MOST NEW TALENTS, AS WELL AS THE MORE ESTABLISHED WRITERS, FINDS IT ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO GET THEIR BOOKS IN THE LIBRARY.

Wednesday, June 20, 2018

ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT.

A Toronto Corrupt Judge, Rachel Grinberg. Her court demeanor
and actions as a judge, belies her other involvements, as an
upstanding community member and as a Board member, of a
Canadian Charity. What the public do not know, is how she
and other judges, operates behind closed door.

Some of the practices of Ontario Judge, Rachel Grinberg, included, having   closed door hearings and excluding the public from participating. THIS JUDGE IS KNOWN TO LOCK THE COURTROOM DOOR, when dealing with the unrepresented and under privileged persons, appearing before her. Those who are most likely unable, to get any further assistance with their cases, through legal aid and are then forced, to represent themselves in the courtroom. Although they are often assisted by the duty counsel in the courtroom, this is also misleading, because both the duty counsel and the crown attorney, for the sake of argument, are on the same team. The duty counsel, will also not necessarily act, in either their best interest, or that of the public. 

The corruption comes from judges, like Ontario Provincial Court judge, RACHEL GRINBERG, who has a duty to uphold, by having her courtroom, being made accessible to the public. And it would not hurt either, to have cameras and other recording devices in the courtroom, that are designed to protect both the proceedings and the rights of the participants. It is shameful to see how this CANADIAN JUDGE, Rachel Grinberg, has allowed the public, including lawyers attending the courtroom for their other clients and others, to be barred from the courtroom, while she has the judicial pretrials and sometimes trials for the accused, who is also self represented. In fact, the courtroom door is locked, on her instructions. What does that say for any transparency, in the Canadian court?. Not much at all. It is shameful and illegal, how Judge Rachel Grinberg and other corrupt judges, disregard the rights of the individuals, appearing before them and persisting in operating the courtroom, in a manner that is also inconsistent with international human rights laws and even its own constitution.  One of the other charges, against Canadian judge, Rachel Grinberg, is to also continue with a criminal charge, against one of the accused, even after the sole witness could no longer be located and there is no sign that he would even appear in court, even for a trial. The judge was willing to continue with this "phantom case" in the court, in order to nail the accused. And even commenting on what might occur in the future, at a trial with no witness. Still, she was also willing to waste tax payors money on a trial that is unlikely to succeed, due to the lack of a witness. Not that it would have also succeeded, with the single witness, in regards to  his allegations based on his sole statements to the police. It is a case of a "he says, she says" and also a lot of unanswered questions for the police, in regards to their motive, for proceeding with a charge that is based on the testimony of a sole witness, who they also are unable to locate, because he has moved on and does not seem to have an interest in pursuing the charge, he has helped to lay against the accused for his own selfish reasons. Perhaps he also feared any counter charges being laid, with more credible and unrefuted evidence against him.  And that he is also unwilling to take that chance. And going along with this conspiracy, to pervert justice for the accused, is also Assistant Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell.  Blondell, has consistently refused to update the court, on the status of the witness and has also refused to provide full disclosure. WORST OF ALL, SHE HAS A PERSONAL AND VESTED INTEREST IN THE CASE, WHICH GOES BEYOND THE DUTY OF A CROWN. 
Toronto Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell, is known for her CORRUPTION
in cases before the court. As a Crown Attorney, she is known to lie openly and to also participate
in actions that are so corrupt and that also goes against public interest, that she is beyond
being corrigible. She has no morals, ethics, or any other redeemable qualities, which would
make her trustworthy, or that would also instill any confidence in her ability, to represent the
public, in her present job as a Crown attorney.
  I encourage members of the public to expose her corrupt actions, in letters to the Ministry of Attorney General, AND IN PUBLIC SHAMINGS, as I am now doing. For too long those like Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell-King, has relied on their actions being hidden from public scrutiny. Public shaming, is one way of getting those that she answers to, including the public, from tolerating her corrupt practices, and booting her out of her current position. Using her position to go after any members of the public, because of her personal interest in a case, or in acting in other ways to either pervert justice, or to interfere with the rights of persons, appearing before the court, is intolerable. The public will not accept this degenerate and wants her out of her present position, to act on their behalf.

  TWO OF ONTARIO'S CURRENT JUDGE AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE. JUDGE RACHEL GRINNBERG AND JP DIANE MCALEER. PROFILES:  FROM BEING PRIVILEDGED WHITE WOMEN, TO NOW UPHOLDING THE RACIST JUDICIAL SYSTEM, THAT BOTH PROMOTES AND PROTECTS WHITES.

HOW THEY BOTH PRACTICES RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. AND WHY THIS IS ALSO A COMMON PRACTICE, AMONG OTHER JUDGES, JPS, CROWN ATTORNEYS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, IN ALL CANADIAN COURTS.   




                           


Wednesday, May 16, 2018

CONFRONTING STATE TERROR: I AM A TARGETED INDIVIDUAL. AND THE GUILTY PARTY IS CANADA.


WHAT IS A TARGETED INDIVIDUAL? "A person who has become a target by any party, organization or entities. Ranging from corruption in business, or by the government and even being targeted by regular people i.e the community at large (who has been selected to carry this out, by one of the parties listed above). A person who becomes a targeted individual will face campaigns of surveillance of different degrees and generally speaking, campaigns that negatively impact an individual.  this could range from campaigns to harass, discredit, sabotage, instill fear and paranoia, manipulate, extort, or even assassinate; among others"... (Reprinted statement). (See the rest of my own article below).


HOW DOES ONE BECOME A TARGET OF THE GOVERNMENT?.  All that you need to do in order to become a target and a victim of your government, is to start telling the truth about its actions. You can become a target by either acting on your own, or as part of a group. Either way, once you have decided to exercise your democratic rights and to voice your opinions publicly, such as by protesting, demonstrating, or writing about the government as a journalist, or blogger, then expect that the government will also find ways, to curb your efforts to expose its actions. For many it may take the form of open persecutions. For others it may be less observable, but non the less heinous in its scope of atrocities that are also illegal and are committed against you. And which has abused your basic human rights. Nevertheless, you will also notice a marketable change in your environment and in others who may now become government agents, such as paid informers and or agent provocateurs, against you. Be that at your workplace, at your home, or your place of business.
The goal is to make you believe that you are being paranoid and that your are not really being targeted, or that you have somehow imagined the whole thing. What you should know is that you have now become a part of a government funded and black operation program, that is mainly geared towards mind control and of terrorizing you into submission. The alternative is that if you resist, you may also be eliminated by the government, using one of its most effective methods against you. Those who are mainly targeted are the following:
* Whistleblowers
* Bloggers
* Human Rights Activists
* Social Activists
* Journalists (who exposed corruption. i,e those who are independent and who are not sanctioned by the government controlled media)
* Anyone can become a targeted individual
* Members of a religious group, or of often a visible minority, or some other marginalized group
*Single parents (usually single mothers) (and most of whom have had their children removed from their homes, because they are viewed as being mentally unstable, when in fact it is the State which has targeted them, in order to take their children away)
* Those with some financial resources (I once met an elderly (black) woman who was targeted in such a manner, by the management of her apartment building. She was living in a subsidized unit and the management, wanted her to use up all of her financial resources,  in order to keep the unit. (They discovered that she had some investments). She experienced chemicals being sprayed in her apartment in her absence and was even forced to sleep under the staircase at night, due to the harassment). Finally, the management got her out of the building and she is now living in a shelter.
* One single mother (white) who have had her small child taken away by the Children's Aid Society, was also subjected to this kind of targeting. In fact she could not walk down the street where she lives, without seeing the "government authorities" parked on her street and carrying out this psychological abuse of her mental state. They wanted to make sure that she never got her child back, and also succeeded in making her into an mentally unstable person.
*

Keep in mind that often the targeted individual and the perpetrator, are both under mind control tactics used against them. The perpetrator who often knows the victim, are made to believe that by carrying out the targeting of the victim, that they are also doing their "civil duty". That is they are being good citizens, when in fact the entire aspect of the targeting is also criminal.

The internet is full of people who are now protesting against this atrocity and abuse of their persons and of  their human rights.
The tactics that are used Against targeted Individuals
* Blacklisted
* Psychological and physical torture, using remote weapons to target the victims in their homes and  anywhere else.
* Noise harassment
*Electromagnetic harassment
*Illegal surveillance 24/7
* Financial sabotage
* Email hacking, telephone tapping
* Satellite remote monitoring
* Loss of job
*Loss of family, friends and acquaintances
* Sleep deprivation
* Voice to skull technology
* The use of agents and provocateurs
*Microwave weapons
*Non consensual human experiments
* Food poisoning
*Torture and the killing of the victims pets
*covert drugging
*Illegal break ins
* Mind control
*Character assassination


James Bond 007 tactics, used against some targeted individuals. My personal Experience.
Some years ago, I was in the subway on the upper level waiting for my bus. A white man came up to me and jabbed me with an umbrella under my right rib cage. At first he said to me, "Don't I know you from somewhere?. I said "No, I don't think so". Next thing I knew, as he spoke to me, he also jabbed me (more like a light touch) with the point of the umbrella. I thought nothing of it at the time and when the bus came I walked towards the line and so did he. Being in front of him, I got on the bus first and waited to see if he was also getting on the bus. He did not. I looked out of the window and he was nowhere on the platform either. He just simply disappeared. What is unusual about this incident is that ever since that time, I have had a soreness under my right ribcage. I told this to one of my close friends years ago and we both thought that it was unusual. More so because of the fact that people do not normally go around jabbing other people with the point of their umbrellas. And for the victim to still feel the effect of it years later, as a soreness in the exact spot. I could have been micro chipped, or injected with a cancer gene. Or something else just as sinister. This also happened in broad daylight, on a somewhat sparsely crowded subway platform (upper level) and with people milling around. I am convinced that the Canadian government authorities, perhaps the police or CSIS, were behind it. It was something straight out of a James Bond movie and it happened to me. I am just a Blogger, who has been exposing the truth about that government's human rights abuse. So no one is safe from the government, in my opinion.
You only need to read my Blog (entirely) to find out the many other different ways that the Canadian government, has gone about targeting me. Including, at all levels of government, and who all have the same agenda. To destroy my efforts and in the process to destroy me as an individual. The conspirators are so numerous, that it is hard for me to fight back all of them. But I do try. I do not sit down and take their attacks, without responding to it. For one thing, their actions are no longer hidden, thanks to my Blog. Neither can they also expect to get away with their actions against me, without facing some kind of penalty. The absolute worst thing that a targeted individual can do, in those circumstances, is not to fight back. As a world wide community, our governments and others who carry out this criminal activity against the public, are learning that the victims will fight back. Despite their enormous black operations budget and their advance weaponry, the ordinary person can and often do find ways to fight against it. Do not give in to their tactics and never be silent about the atrocities that are committed against you. Take back your individual power and defeat the enemy.







LTB ADJUDICATOR, MICK MCMASTER AND THE HEARING, ON JUNE 5TH

THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD AND THE MEMBER, MICK MCMASTER, TRYING TO REVERSE, A RES JUDICATA DECISION, THAT HE HAD MADE ON JUNE 5TH, WH...