SUPPORT THIS BLOG AND MAKE A DONATION.

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

CANADA IS SEEKING TO PROTECT ITS OWN CASE,BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT,BY GOING AFTER VENEZUELA.

CANADA, SHOULD LEAVE VENEZUELA ALONE AND FOCUS ON ITS OWN HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES. WHICH ARE MANY AND STILL UNFOLDING.

Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, has joined a Multilateral group of Nations, in trying to bring Venezuela, before the International Criminal Court, for is human rights abuses.
Canada, as a country and State, is itself facing criminal charges, before the International Criminal Court, for Crimes Against Humanity.
The difference between Canada and Venezuela, is that the former's crimes are secretly being carried out, while the latter's indiscretions are showcased before the entire world. Both countries are guilty, of violations of international laws, on human rights.

No one is taking the I.C.C seriously. Its ability to adjudicate cases fairly, has come under severe criticism. Along with is penchant for going after "third world countries", almost all of which are also African countries and leaving the more technologically advanced countries, out of the picture. When was the last time that the USA, Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Canada and other big name countries, has come under scrutiny, or even criticism for their actions, by the I.C.C?

It is no wonder that the USA, and other countries are showing their disdain for the I.C.C, by either pulling out of the treaty, or threatening sanctions, against that impotent and corrupt institution.
It is noteworthy here that Canada, has perniciously advanced its position, with both the International Criminal Court, the Inter American Commission on Human Rights and even the United Nations, just hide its own crimes. Its own violations on human rights issues.

-Human Rights abuse victims in Canada, have a difficult time in getting the I.C.C, to go after that country. Having a Canadian judge on its judiciary bench, almost guaranteed that the I.C.C could be found in the position of a conflict of interest, when deciding on a case against Canada.





CANADA IS A BIG HYPOCRITE AND ITS GOVERNMENT A DAMN LIE,





ON HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES. CANADA IN THE PAST, AS WELL AS NOW,
CONTINUES TO CARRY OUT, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE ATROCITIES.

ON BOTH INDIVIUALS, AS WELL AS GROUPS OF PEOPLE AS A WHOLE, IN THAT COUNTRY. IT IS A COUNTRY WHOSE GOVERMENT, IS OPERATED UNDER CORRUPTION. AS THERE ARE NO OVERSIGHT, IN ITS GOVERNANCE, TO IMPLEMENT MEASURES, AGAINST THAT PRACTICE.

The Residential Schools debacle, regarding Canada's Native Population. No less than a genocide.
The Chinese head tax and the Japanese confinement camps.
The enslavement of blacks in Canada.
The systematic racism that is a part of the fabric of Canadian society
The corruption that is practice by officials in government, and NGO working with the government.
The torture of Canadians, under programs such as MKUltra, in the 50's 60's and even now.
The persecution of Bloggers, by Canadian police and CSIS and others in the intelligence agencies.
Canada's practice of invading third world countries, for its natural resources and robbing them through its mining companies. Including, the use of forced labour, as in the Eritrean mining incident and other  countries in South America and Central America, some of which has tried to sue that country, over human rights abuse issues.
Canadian soldiers torture of Somali soldiers, and other war crimes.




But its still tries to pull the wool over the eyes of whoever is gullible enough to believe its lies.

Note:  This writer has a case against Canada, with the International Criminal Court, for its acts of Crimes Against Humanity, that was carried out against her, as a means of punishment. The case is still before the I.C.C. as the writer seeks a redress for those crimes that were committed against her, by that country.

Thursday, November 8, 2018

THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY'S CORRUPT MEMBERS: VICKERY BOWLES, NANCY MARSHALL AND SUE GRAHAM-NUTTER.






DOES TORONTO NEED, A CITY LIBRARIAN, LIKE VICKERY BOWLES, WHO DO NOT RESPOND, TO A PUBLIC INQUIRY?.  AND TO HOLD MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IN CONTEMPT, IN REGARDS TO HER ACTIONS?. NO, WE DO NOT.
Vickery Bowles. No response from
her, or the TPL, regarding the outcome
of the Children Book Selection Committee's
alleged meeting on October 11th, to review
my children books. It has been one month
of waiting for them to respond to my
inquiries, as to the outcome of the meeting.
I have gotten from them a "wall of silence"
concerning that alleged meeting.
My guess, is that the Committee did
not get to review those books, because
it was not given to the Committee,
due to the personal reasons, of those
TPL's Management staff. In other words
I believed that they have either blocked
the books from being reviewed. Or have covered
up the response from the committee, for their
own personal reasons. Which is also corrupt.
Sue Graham Nutter, TPL Board Chair.
Sue Graham Nutter, has failed to respond
to my written complaint, about TPL's staff.
Or to present my complaint to the TPL's
other Board Members.
VICKERY BOWLES, TORONTO'S CITY LIBRARIAN, HAS CHOSEN TO REMAIN SILENT, SOMEWHAT, ALTHOUGH SHE AND OTHER MANAGEMENT STAFF, OF THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY,  NOW SEEM TO BE USING PUBLIC FUNDING, TO GET THEIR LAWYERS, TO COME AFTER ME. AND FOR WHAT?.
For making it known that they have acted and continues to act racist, and also corrupt, towards a member of a visible minority. And that they have also implemented a racist policy towards members of a visible minority. One that included their personal opinions and attitude, as well as other disturbing actions on the part of the Toronto Public Library's Management and Board Chair and Vice Chair.






It is one month now since October 11th and the day that I was informed by the Toronto Public Library's Management staff, Michele Melady (and also acting on  behalf of Susan Caron and Vickery Bowles), that the Children Book Selection Committee, would be meeting on October 11th, to decide on the five books that I had sent to the TPL for review by that committee, in the hope of purchasing them. Now after waiting for one month (and still counting) to get a response as to the outcome of that Committee's meeting, regarding those books, I have yet to get a response from the TPL and specifically, from Vickery Bowles, Susan Caron and Michele Melady, regarding the outcome of that alleged Committee meeting. 
Personally, I am of the opinion that the Committee did not get to see my books. Here are the reasons why. # 1 That those persons mentioned, did not in fact present the books to the Selection Committee, on that date, or at any other times. #2. That they also never intended to present the books to the Committee. (Based on their own reasons). #3. That this was done because they did not want to purchase the books. #4. That they intended to defraud me out of the rights of those books, by holding on to the books still and not returning them to me, after one month of waiting, for a response. #5. That they acted in conjunction with others to sabotage my efforts to get those books purchased by the library. #6. That they have used their personal influence to that end. #7. That they have acted corruptly regarding the matter. #8. That they have also breached the public trust in this matter, if it was proven that they had lied about the Committee's meeting and the reviewing of the books #9. Or to have withheld the decision of the Selection Committee, in regards to those books, because they also intended to cause me harm, over that decision.
Corruption among Toronto officials is nothing new. That is how they operate and will continue to operate, unless their secrets are exposed to the public.









Wednesday, November 7, 2018

FREEDOM OF SPEECH, IS UNDER ATTACK, IN CANADA.

THE CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, SECRETLY UNDERMINED, MY EXPULSION FROM THE EMERGENCY SHELTER, IN ORDER TO CAUSED ME SERIOUS HARM. AS PART OF ITS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHEMENT OF ME, AS A BLOGGER.

THIS ALSO INCLUDED, THOSE IN THE SHELTER, SUPPORT AND HOUSING ADMINISTRATION.  INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING PERSONS: TAMIKA GIVENS,

MARK KIM, BRAD BOUCHER, PAUL RAFTIS, NATALIE WILLIAMS AND OTHERS.


THE PERSONAL CORRUPTION, OF BRAD BOUCHER, HOUSING CONSULTANT, AND ALSO RELATING TO THE FRED VICTOR CENTRE AND THE COVERUP OF THAT AGENCY'S CORRUPT PRACTICES.

SHELTER, SUPPORT AND HOUSING ADMINISTRATION: BRAD BOUCHER, HOUSING CONSULTANT. "YOUR BLOG POST AND COMPLAINTS, AGAINST FRED VICTOR CENTRE, IS VIEWED AS HARASSMENT BY THE STAFF". REFERRING, TO WHY THAT AGENCY, HAS REFUSED TO OFFER EMERGENCY SHETER AND ALSO IMPOSED A SIX YEAR RESTRICTION, ON BLOGGER, WHO HAS EXPOSED THEIR ACTIONS TO THE PUBLIC.






The complaints that this City of Toronto official, Brad Boucher, is talking about here, go back years before, when I had stayed at the Fred Victor Centre on Calidonia Road, in Toronto. I was also leaving an abusive situation and at the time it was also the only shelter that exist in all of Toronto, that also takes pets. Unfortunately, the organization was also full of corruption, in how the staff and management operated the shelter. There was much abuse of power and a lack of regard for the care of the animals. On one occasion I had made a video of two of the staff, who were the only ones on duty, who was much more interested in shooting pool, while they leave the emergency and crisis line unanswered in the office. On another occasion, a resident was attacked while sleeping alone by a male staff name Ken, who allegedly took it upon himself, to let himself in the resident's room where she was sleeping alone at the time. Breaking with shelter rules at the time, this male staff, who was supposed to be checking the dorm rooms with his female co-worker, who also happened to be fast asleep in the office, while he did the rounds by himself, late at night. The resident said that he had "pushed the door and came in on her". The Fred Victor Manager, did nothing to disciplined that staff. Further more and more homeless residents at the Fred Victor shelter, were being put out on the street with their animals, and without shelter staff giving a second thought as to how they would managed in the cold. (I had stayed there at the end of 2013, right around the holidays and left there in January 2014). Residents were also coming to me with their stories about their treatment at the hands of Fred victor staff and its onsite Manager, Danielle Ashby. One resident, was so afraid to tell her story at the time, while at the shelter, that she had agreed to for us to meet at the local coffee shop, to tell me about her experience, as a homeless woman at the Fred Victor shelter, on Calidonia Road, in Toronto. 

Notwithstandingly, the Fred Victor staff were concerned about me staying at their shelter and also reporting on their activities. Those complaints that had involved me, directly, I had also reported to the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and they all went to Brad Boucher, who had so much sided with the corruption of the Fred Victor shelter staff and management, that he also claimed that he had approved them restricting me from its shelters, for longer than six months. Keep in mind that under the Toronto Shelter Standards, restricting a resident from the use of an emergency shelter for longer than three months, required that the moved be approved by those in the Shelter Support and Housing Administration.  Brad Boucher, then as now, acted corruptly to cover up the actions of the Fred Victor Centre staff, who have acted inappropriately, either towards the residents, or in carrying out their duties, as shelter staff.

Fast forward to today, and Brad Boucher is still saying that the Fred Victor Centre is justified in refusing me any assistance, some five years going on six years down the road, for reporting on them, then and also recently. In his email to me yesterday, he claimed that the Fred Victor Centre staff view my ongoing reports about them as harassment and therefore I am being banned from their shelters. And for what now seem as an indefinite period. The problem with this decision is that it goes against Shelter Standards guidelines.  Unless the resident has made a direct threat, or his behavior is threatening in some ways, (that is could caused physical harm to someone), or has been violent towards the staff, then that resident also have a right to use the services of the housing provider, who is also under contract with the City of Toronto (a corporation).   Exercising one's right to freedom of speech by reporting about the staff's inappropriate conduct, should not be viewed as a harassment of the staff.  Neither should a resident who has made complaints about Fred Victor Centre shelter staff, be considered as harassing the staff, at the time of the complaints, some six years ago.

While it would be considered an uncomfortable situation to be put in, for both the staff and the person who has reported on their actions, the move was also justified, because if they had not put me out in the cold some weeks ago with my animal, because some old restriction was in place, then I would not have reported on them in the media recently. When I was also asked last week by the Manager of the shelter, Marcia Gilmore, to retract the recent article I had written about them, as a prerequisite to her letting me stay at the shelter and I had also refused, I knew that they would also take further reprisal actions against me. For their actions to be condoned by the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and by the housing consultant for the Fred Victor Centre, Brad Boucher, also go against the Shelter Standards Rules and Regulations. One of which is that any restrictions put on a resident, or former resident, can also be temporarily lifted, if the situation, such as weather conditions, is extreme. It may be Authum officially,  but the weather in Toronto, is winter like. That is considered as extreme and no one should be put out in the cold by an emergency shelter, such as Fred Victor, for something that they did years ago, or even for some infringement of the rules based on their current stay at the shelter. To prove that there was more behind the actions of the Fred Victor staff and also those in Shelter Support and Housing Administration, when they were confronted with the evidence of another resident (male) of the Fred Victor shelter, who was in a physical altercation at the same time, with another male resident of the shelter, they did not evict him from the shelter. This happened on the same day that they'd asked me to leave. According to Fred Victor staff, Michael Joseph (who also witnessed the incident at the resident's meeting) and later the Manager, Marcia Gilmore, "each resident's situation is different" and she also added, "we won't discussed another resident's situation with you".

What I believed personally about the actions of the Fred Victor staff, and those in the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, such as Brad Boucher, Natalie Williams, Tamika Givens and the head of that division, Paul Raftis and Gordon Tanner, is that they had all worked in a conspiracy to destabilized me and to make me homeless, as part of the ongoing persecution that I am going through, that is being carried out by the Canadian government. Someone had contacted Fred Victor (it could have been the Manager, Danielle Ashby, as it was later confirmed by a representative of the shelter system, who got that information from Fred Victor staff directly), or it could have been others
involved, whose names and identity, has remained a secret. And that once the Shelter Support and Housing Administration now got involved, to investigate the actions of the shelter, those others in that division, became involved in the conspiracy to put me out in the cold, as well.

And for their actions, I have now added their names to the list of other Canadian government officials, who have acted to carry out the international crime against me, under the Rome Statute, under Crimes Against Humanity, in the International Criminal Court. I cannot mention here how many secret cruel and unusual punishment that government and its officials has carried out against me. I hope to see them all stand before a court one day and answer for their crimes.



Wednesday, October 31, 2018

FRED VICTOR CENTRE, BROKE THE LAW, BY TAKING REPRISAL ACTIONS, AGAINST BLOGGER.

TORONTO SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING EXECUTIVES, TOOK NO ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC, OR TO ENFORCE THE SHELTER STANDARDS ACT, IN THIS CASE. IT CAN BE VIEWED IN TWO WAYS: CULPABILITY (A CRIMINAL ACT) AND COMPLICITY, IN REGARDS TO THEIR ACTIONS. OTHER ACTIONS ON THEIR PART INCLUDED, CONSPIRACY(SPECIFICLLY, THAT THEY HAD CONSPIRED, TO CAUSED FURTHER INJURY TO THIS BLOGGER, BY TAKING NO ACTIONS TO PROTECT HER SAFETY), CORRUPTION AND BREACH OF TRUST.

ANYONE CAN BECOME HOMELESS, FOR VARIOUS REASONS.  WHEN THAT HAPPENS, IT IS ALSO A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE. SHELTERS EXIST TO PROVIDE FOR THE IMMEDIATE NEED, OF THE HOMELESS. TO PUT 
SOMEONE WHO IS HOMELESS, OUT ON THE STREET AND IN THE COLD, WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFIABLE REASONS, OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT A PREVIOUS RESTRICTION WAS STILL IN PLACE, IS NOT A GOOD ENOUGH REASON, TO ENDANGER THE SAFETY OF ANYONE.

FRED VICTOR CENTRE, AS A HOUSING  PROVIDER, THAT IS UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF TORONTO, TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY AND LONG TERM SHELTER SUPPORT, TO THE HOMELESS.  IT HAS BROKEN SHELTER STANDARDS REGULATIONS, BY TELLING A HOMELESS WOMAN THEY HAD PUT OUT IN THE COLD WITH HER ANIMAL, THAT IT WOULD TAKE THEM ANOTHER TWO WEEKS, TO MAKE A DECISION, WHEN OR IF THE WOMAN CAN RETURN TO THE SHELTER. THIS UNUSUAL DELAY IS ALSO AGAINST SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING STANDARDS ACT, FOR RESTRICTIONS THAT DO NOT INCLUDE THE SAETY OF OTHERS, BUT IS BASED ON SOME PREVIOUS ACTIONS, THAT WAS DONE SOME SIX YEARS PREVIOUSLY, THAT ALSO DID NOT INCLUDE ANY THREAT, OR VIOLENCE TO OTHERS.
Marcia Gilmore, a shelter manager, at the Fred Victor Centre
has delayed her response, in making a decision, under Shelter Support
and Housing Regulations, after a homeless woman was put out in
the cold last week with her animal, when she was told that she was
still restricted after six years, from all Fred Victor Centre shelters,
after she had reported (six years ago) in the media about the abuse of
power, and other practices, by Fred Victor Centre's shelter managers
and other staff.


Marcia Gilmore's comment, to this blogger: "Can you take down the article, that you wrote on your blog, about Fred Victor", before giving an answer to the woman, this blogger, concerning the six year restriction, that was put on her by another Fred Victor Centre Manager, Danielle Ashby, back in 2013, after reporting on the actions of Fred Victor's staff. When the blogger said no, that she was obligated to the public and not to the Fred Victor Centre, in regards to what she report on her blog, she was then told by Marcia Gilmore, that she would have to wait, "until  next week", to get an answer from her, if and when she could return to the shelter.
The Blogger had lost her home last week and had gone to the shelter, which is also the only shelter in Toronto, that also takes animals on a long term basis. Aside from the Fred Victor Centre shelters, there are only a few other housing providers, that operate on a drop in basis, that may take animals, on a day to day basis, in regards to their 24 hour respite. With those ones you also have to meet specific criteria as well. Such as Sprott House, a LGBQT, shelter in Toronto that takes animals on a temporary basis. And most of them are also full on any given day.
On the same day that the homeless woman was asked to leave the Fred Victor shelter, located at 545 Lakeshore Blvd. West in Toronto, a fight had broken out between two men at the same shelter and one of them had assaulted the other man, in front of other witnesses. The man who had assaulted the other resident, was not asked to leave the shelter. He was allowed to stay at the shelter by the two staff, who had also witnessed the incident. (The fight had broken out at a resident meeting, where staff was also in attendance). Fred Victor staff, Michael Joseph and Tracy Baker, allowed the man to remained at the shelter, after committing the assault). When that incident was brought up with the manager, Marcia Gilmore, she responded that "each case was different". Not only was that resident not evicted from the Fred Victor shelter, for his violence, but he also did not have to wait two weeks, for an answer from the Fred Victor staff and management, if he could stay at the shelter. If their treatment of residents is based on fairness and equality, then that is also lacking, in regards to their decision in my case. There is also a "conspiracy of silence", in regards to the Shelter Support and Housing, Management, while they continue to ignore the situation. For instance, under the SSHA, a housing provider, is suppose to get the approval from Shelter Support And Housing Administration, first, if they have imposed a restriction on a resident, or former resident, that is longer than 3 months. According to Brad Boucher, Manager at Shelter, Support and Housing, he had "approved the restriction, longer than 6 months", from Fred Victor Centre, in regards to my case, back in 2013, when it was first imposed. When I asked him to provide me with a copy of that document, Brad Boucher, SSHA, has so far refused and has since remained silent on the matter. Other Shelter Support and Housing Administration staff who has also remained silent in regards to this current situation, include the following: Mark Kim, Tamika Givens, Natalie Williams, Milton Berra, who is also acting in place of the Director, Gordon Tanner, (who is back on November 6th) and Paul Raftis, (Interim)General Manager.

A CASE OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
This blogger is adding their names to the list of other Canadian government officials and others who have acted in a conspiracy with those officials, to violate her human right and to cause her harm, with the International Criminal Court. As a part of that process, the victim and this blogger, can also add any new evidence to the process, which has started before this incident, had occurred and at any stage in the proceedings before that court. As I have officially been contacted by the Office of the Prosecutor of the I.C.C. and my case also officially acknowledged by the I.C.C. and is still in the "Preliminary Stage", which do not have a specific timeline, but could proceed as long as there is additional evidence that is needed by the International Criminal Court, to proceed with my matter before that court, I will continue to provide new evidence to that court, in regards to the crimes that have been committed against me, by those officials, under the Rome Statute, Article 7, in regards to Crimes Against Humanity, against me.   




















Monday, October 29, 2018

PROCEEDING, IN THE INTERNTIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.


THERE WILL BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, WITH A CANADIAN JUDGE PRESIDING OVER CASES, THAT ARE CURRENTLY BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CIMINAL COURT.  WHICH  HAS ALSO IMPLICATED THAT COUNTRY, IN CRIMES COMMITTED, UNDER ROME STATUTE.                                                                                                                                                                                               

Unfortunately, she got in. All six judges are there to re-enforced, the UN's
New World Order, in regard to their decisions. Leading towards a one
world government and jurisprudence. Do you honestly believed, that
the countries of Africa, are the only ones committing those crimes,
which are outlined in the Rome Statute?. Conveniently absent from prosecutions
 are the countries of Canada and the USA, as well as Israel, Russia, China and
the countries of the Middle East. All of which are prone to committing gross
human rights violations. 


A Canadian judge, with high hopes of becoming a judge of the International
Criminal Court. Unfortunately, this one also got in and is now a part of that
court. In fact, Canada is both a defendant (it's officials) before the I.C.C,
as well as being a part of the prosecution team, as a presiding judge.
















BUILDING A CASE BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THROUGH PERSISTENCE, KNOWLEDGE, SKILL AND DEDICATION. AND WITH FORE KNOWLEGE OR FORESIGHT. 

One of the more interesting things about the I.C.C. is that there is no statue of limitations, as to how far back one can go, to initiate a criminal proceeding against individuals of a State, that has ratified its treaty with the I.C.C. Likewise, there is no timelines provided in the Statue either, for when a preliminary examination may be completed by the Prosecutor. Since it is an ongoing process in gathering the necessary evidence needed to bring the case together, or to established if there is sufficient evidence, for a case and to proceed to trial, then the victim of those crimes and their legal team can use that time to bring additional evidence before the Prosecutor, adding to the information  that they already have concerning the criminal charges, that are before the court. New evidence and new witnesses can be added along the way. Which brings me to the point that I am trying to make here. That of adding more names to the list of individuals, who has committed those atrocities against me, under the Rome Statute and consisting of Crimes Against Humanity. The list against those Canadian officials, representing both the government and non-governmental organizations, that has worked together with that government, to carry out those crimes against me, that falls under that section of the Rome Statute. 

It should also make them very nervous, since I am also determined to proceed, in the International Criminal Court against them. It is a long process and especially for someone like me who is also determined to win. If the Prosecutor need a bit of a prod to continue with the proceedings before the I.C.C, then that is what will happen. And what better way to continue with the proceeding before the court, than to provide new evidence to the court on the crimes that were and continue to be committed against me by Canadian government officials. And with impunity. That is also where the I.C.C. come in. It claim that its role is to destroy the impunity that most government officials enjoy, at the expense of the victims of their alleged crimes. All of which happen to fall under the Rome Statute and the jurisdiction of the I.C.C. And just because you bring a case before the I.C.C. also do not mean that the I.C.C. is also particularly interested in investigating it, or in bringing those responsible for committing those crimes against you to trial. It is not interested in any of that. I am of the opinion that the I.C.C. has its own agenda that is also inextricably tied to the UN's and that both of them do not necessarily represent the interest of justice, or of stopping those crimes that are committed by those States. Some think that it is all a show and that the I.C.C. is not really that serious in prosecuting any State officials per say, only in appearing to do so. Which brings me to another important point. That is, on the I.C.C's relationship with some of those countries, or States and the conflict of interest that it also create when bringing those State officials before the I.C.C. for prosecution.  I am talking about countries like Canada, and especially with the appointment of a Canadian judge Kimberly Prost, as one of the six new judges that are now presiding over that court. Some may find it hard to believe that Canada is also guilty of some of the worst kinds of human rights abuse, such as Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and even Crimes of Aggression. Can we get an impartial ruling from the I.C.C, with a Canadian judge sitting as a trial judge to its hearings?. I do not think so.
Particularly relevant to this article, is the Crimes Against Humanity ATTROCITIES, which it has committed against me and which is no laughing matter. Though it may appear to be humorous to those Canadian government officials who are also carrying this out against me. Continuing to amuse me, all the way to a conviction. Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda and the I.C.C cannot tell me that I do not have a case either, before the I.C.C. Not with the abundance of evidence that I have presented here on my Blog and elsewhere. Such as the overwhelming evidence that exist in regards to my matters before the Canadian courts, over the years.  Unrefuted evidence, that shows a continuous effort by that government, to abuse my human rights.