Thursday, December 18, 2014

THE PROTEST AT THE OLD CITY HALL COURT, WILL CONTINUE, UNTIL THE CORRUPT JUDGES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, ARE ALSO HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.

THE PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR MORE TRANSPARENCY, IN THAT CANADIAN COURT.

Racism, Incompetent Judges and Justices of the Peace, and A Lack of Accountability, Makes
This Court One Of The Worst Courts In Canada. You Have To Also Wonder How Minority Judges, Can Also Be Involved, In This Practice?. 


The protest today in front of the Old City Hall Courthouse, in Toronto went well. Even though it was a small protest, there was also a lot of public support. The public wanted to know more about the human rights violations by that court and also about which Judges and Justices of the Peace, are also involved in committing those crimes.

For that reason, also, there will  be more protests at that court, in the month of December 2014 and also in the near future.  In fact there will be a protest in front of the Old City Hall Courthouse every week, until those judges who are also involved in the conspiracy against me, are completely exposed and are also held accountable. We are also protesting the ban of all cameras and audio recordings, by that court still and that all hearings are also recorded, in order to help to stop the corruption, that is also the standard practice of that court.

There will be pictures posted of those corrupt judges, crown attorneys and justices of the peace and also videos of the protest, for all of the world to see the faces, of those who are involved. It should be a great deterrent, for future crimes that are also committed, by those members of the judiciary.


Friday, December 5, 2014

THE TRIAL CONTINUES, BEFORE JUDGE J. RICHIE, TO DECEMBER 5, 2014, AT OLD CITY HALL COURT.

SHOCKING NEW REVELATIONS ARE MADE, BY THE CROWN'S MAIN WITNESS, (AND THE POLICE ALLEGED VICTIM IN THIS CASE), WHO UNDER OATH HAS IDENTIFIED HERSELF TO BE SOMEONE ELSE, OTHER THAN IN THE POLICE REPORT.


Judge J. Richie
A Toronto Judge who has been upbraided for his bias decisions.


The Prosecutor's two witnesses gave inconsistent testimonies. 

THE POLICE DETECTIVE, DAVID KEVIN FRIMETH AND CROWN ATTORNEY JOHN FLAHERTY, HAS COMMITTED FRUAD UPON THE COURT, I ALSO BELIEVE, BY
PROVIDING TO THE COURT, A FRAUDULENT PIECE OF EVIDENCE, A BOGUS HEALTH CARD, THAT WAS ALSO PRODUCED BY THE POLICE, IN ORDER TO PROTECT AND ALSO TO HIDE THE TRUE IDENTITY, OF THE MAIN WITNESS IN THIS CASE.


1. After taking the oath and when she was asked to give her name, the witness gave a name that was
different from the one in the police report of the alleged victim, regarding the alleged assault.  The court was now dealing with two witnesses.  The one in the police report and the one on the witness stand.


2.  When the defendant then pointed this out to the court, the Crown Attorney, John Flaherty also tried to pass it off as nothing.  Claiming that the witness who is of Chinese background tend to use a different version of her name for cultural reasons, so this should error should also be overlooked by the court.  The defendant would not have it so and also asked the court for physical proof from the witness, in identifying herself legally, to the court. 

3. The crown's main witness who has testified could also not provide any such identification, except for a so-called government issued health card.  Again the defendant also caught some anomalies with that piece of evidence, as with the name of the alleged victim in the police report.  Judge J. Richie was also leaning towards favoring the Crown Attorney John Flarherty's request to accept that document as legal proof of the witness identity, which also differs from the one of the alleged  victim in this case. In essence the Crown Attorney John Flaherty, was asking the court to do something illegal, by also accepting the health card as a valid piece of government issued document, for legal purposes, when it is not. And which the court also granted as evidence that can be used by the prosecutor's witness. Who had already given conflicting evidence, in regards to her name.

4. A health card is not a valid piece of document that is also used for identification purposes. In fact it is also illegal to accept a health card,from someone, for that purpose.  And especially on its own, without any other corroborating documents, as proof of someone's legal identity. It is also forbidden under the law and it also seem as if in Judge J. Richie's courtroom, that piece of evidence, from that document, might also be accepted by the judge. So basically, Judge J. Richie, is also agreeing to disregarding the law, on the advice of the Crown Attorney, John Flaherty,

5. The other troubling fact about the case, is that Judge J. Richie also seem to want to overlook, the discrepancy in the trial, in regards to the different identities of the two witnesses.  The one in the police report, or disclosure and also the witness, who has taken the stand and also gave testimony under oath, regarding the same case. Judge J. Richie also overlooked the inconsistencies, which also creates doubt, in the testimony of the two witness. The police officer and also the alleged victim.

6. To give the witness the benefit of the doubt, the defendant, who also cross-examined the witness also asked that the witness provide a second piece of government issued identification, but the witness could not. Not even in either names. That is, the one in the police report, or the one that she gave on the witness stand. The witness could not produce any other piece of identification, other than the health card, much less another piece of government issued document, for that purpose.  No driver's license, passport, birth certificate, marriage certificate, or even bank statements. Nothing, other than the bogus health card, which I also believe was given to the police witness, for that purpose, by police directly. 

7.  The so-called government issued health card from the Prosecutor's witness also contained two sets of names. One that was printed at the top and the other the names that were written in ink at the bottom of the health card.  This also suggest that the health card was also not valid. A normal health cards does not show two different sets of names, on the front of the card.

8. The Prosecutor, John Flaherty also proceeded to a trial on the words of a single witness and with no other proof to back up its charge against the defendant, other than those words.  And whose identity has also never been established by the court. We have a police report that is also inconsistent with the testimony of the Prosecutor's main witness, and namely with the witness also identifying herself to the court, with a different name, and identity, from the one in the police report. 

9. Next came the Prosecutor's other witness, who is the police officer who also made the arrest and also was involved in the incident at the police station, in the "cell video", which was later given to the defendant and that was also the basis for the section 11B application violation, under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,by the defendant. In fact there were two police officers involved, but the Crown Attorney John Flaherty, only considered one of the two officers, as a witness and who also testified under oath.  Because of his "lack of recollection" of the events, at the station, the police officer's partner, who the defendant also felt should have also been one of the Crown Attorney's witness at the trial, also made the request for that police officer to testify, but with the Crown Attorney, John Flaherty, vehemently refusing this request, to have that police officer testified.

10. The one officer's statement could also not be challenge, by the defendant, through the cross-examination of his partner, who was also a witness at the police station, regarding the "cell video", either, as the tactic of the Crown Attorney John Flaherty, was to not have the two officers testify under oath about the incident.

The question to be asked is whether or not Judge J. Richie can also properly deal with the legal issues before him and also without being bias? So far in this trial he has also given the Crown Attorney John Flaherty, every opportunity to get what he wanted, even when there are also serious concerns about those requests.

Will Judge J. Richie ignore the fact that the case is also built on the sole testimony of a single witness, whose identity, has now been shown to be different from the one in the police report?. And also based on the Prosecutor's own witness at the trial?. Will he also ignore the other discrepancies in the case, including the inconsistencies of the other witness, the police officer, during his testimony? Will he also accept an illegal document for that purpose, a health card, from the Prosecutor's main witness, as proof that she is who she claim to be, which is also different from the identity of the police alleged victim?.  The law in Ontario specifically states that A HEALTH CARD, CANNOT BE USED AS A LEGAL DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION PUPOSES, YET JUDGE J. RICHIE HAS ALLOWED THE PROSECUTOR, JOHN FLAHERTY, TO USED THIS AS EVIDENCE, IN THE COURT.

The Ontario health card from the prosecutor's witness, that the judge has also accepted as evidence, in the case, I believe was also manufactured by the police, Detective David Kevin Frimeth, in order to protect the true identity of the witness. This is why the witness could also not produce any other piece of documentation, other than the bogus health card, which is also unusual.  The health card should have also been accompanied, by another piece of government issued document for the purpose of identification, such as a passport, or driver's license, birth certificate, or marriage certificate. The witness could not even produce a letter with that name, or bank statement, Anything to verify who she is, and judge J. Richie also took this piece of evidence from the Crown Attorney John Flaherty a nd also accepted it as proof of the witness's identity. 














Wednesday, December 3, 2014

INCOMPETENT JUDGE, J. RICHIE, IS STILLL DECIDING ON CASES, AT TORONTO COURT.

JUDGE WITH A HISTORY OF INCOMPETENCE STILL DECIDING CASES.


WHO APPOINTS THIS JUDGE TO MY CASE?

WE HAVE JUDGES WHO HAS PURPOSELY DISREGARDED THE LAW AND THOSE WHO ARE ALSO EVIDENTLY INCOMPETENT.  THIS JUDGE, J. RICHIE, HAS BOTH CHARACTERISTIC FLAWS, IN HIS DECISIONS, THAT ARE ALSO COSTLY FOR THE DEFENDANTS.

A December 2nd Section 11B Application Before J. Richie Turns Into A"Nightmare" For The Defendant
Valerie Guillaume, "J. Richie has his own way of interpreting and applying the law". "And as for the
Charter of Rights and Freedoms, He does not even begin to know how to respect it, or to respect the rights of the defendants". 
"Richie is a very incompetent and also corrupt judge and his mistakes is also costly. J. Richie's application of the Charter Of Rights violations, should be strenuously scrutinized".





What J. Richie has done in my case to deserve this charge. 



1.  J. Richie in presiding over the 11 B application on December 2nd, also did not even have a copy of the application itself, before him. This confession was made well into the hearing of the application. He claimed that he was not provided with a copy. Yet he also made many statements as to the invalidity of the 11B application, without even reading it at that point. The crown attorney, John Flaherty, then decided to give Richie an extra copy that he had. Richie then took a  two and half hour break to read it. (From 12:30- 2:30, p.m. when the court had reconvened. Keep in mind, also, that the court had also started at 10:00 a.m.  So J. Richie was also well into the proceeding, before acknowledging, that he did not even have the 11B application, on which he should also decide the case. The court was also served with a copy of the 11B application, in May of 2014, seven months earlier.



2. Proceeded on a section 11B motion, without having the transcripts to back up the arguments, of either the crown, or the defendant.



3. Did not believe that the transcripts, were also necessary to established the facts, as far as the delay on the part of the crown attorney, John Flaherty and the police, Det. David Kevin Frimeth of the 14 Div. Toronto police.  (Of the two dozen or so appearances in court by the defendant, Valerie Guillaume, J. Richie only believed that  7 copies of the transcripts were necessary. And out of the 7, he has stated that "only 3 are really necessary", to established the facts, concerning who was a fault, regarding the delay.



4.  Of the 7 transcripts, only one, the February 14, 2014 copy, also contained a court appearance date for this year. Despite the numerous other appearances before the court in 2014. Including the one on May 28, 2014, when the defendant, Valerie Guillaume was also served with the requested video, by the crown attorney, John Flaherty, which was done in open court. This also happened 15 months after the proceedings had begun in February of 2013. (You would also think that the J. Richie would want to have that particular transcript, and to know the reasons that the crown had also given to the court, for the unusual delay. But J. Richie did not think that the May 28, 2014, transcript, was also necessary.



5. Denied the defendant an adjournment of the 11B application motion, to obtain the other transcripts. Including for the most recent dates of November 4th 2014. On that day the defendant also learned about the trial date that was set for December 3rd and 4th.  (Later this date was also changed to December 4th and 5th. This latest change was done on December 2nd. Richie claimed that this was the original trial date that was set in July of 2014. So where did the December 3rd and 4th dates had come from, at the November 4th hearing, when the matter was to be "spoken to"?



6. Changed the trial date from December 4th and 5th, to December 3rd and 4th, and then back to again December 4th, all without the knowledge or consent of the defendant.



7. Had the crown attorney, John Flarherty and the police, Detective David Kevin Frimeth, continually conversed in the courtroom, On December 2nd, during the hearing of the 11B motion, where Flaherty continually leaned over to the police officer and made repeated comments, while the defendant addressed the court. They were also seen to be smiling and laughing with each other, throughout the entire proceeding.



7. J. Richie was also not happy, when the defendant also chose not waive her rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to be cross-examined by the crown attorney John Flaherty. He acted as if the defendant should have also testified as a witness at her own trial. (Which the 11B application/motion was also a part of). (Which was also reason why they had the defendant also arraigned on the charge of assault. A charge that was also built on the sole testimony of a witness who is also believed to be a police informer and agent provocateur.




8.  J. Richie has commented to the defendant, that the crown attorney, John Flaherty was being "more that generous", in his offer, that the defendant's 11B application, be heard after the trial instead of dismissing it altogether"




9. Judge J. Richie has never asked the crown attorney, John Flaherty, the reasons for the 15 months delay, regarding the cell video, when he also provided the further disclosure to the defendant.



10. Judge J. Richie also never ascertained in his reasoning, that the delay of 15 months, which was also indisputable, due to when that last piece of disclosure was also given to the defendant, was either the prosecutor's fault, or that it was also institutional, on the part of the court, and also the police.



10. J. Richie has also acted with a "presumption of bias" that was also evident throughout the 11B application hearing. He also refused to consider the adjournment of the motion to obtain the rest of the transcripts.  He also allowed the crown to have all that he has requested from the court, including dismissing the 11B application and also previous motions and to also proceed to a trial, that both the crown and this judge also knows should not happen.



11. That the crown attorney in also proceeding with a trial, that the other judges who has also heard the case, prior to J. Richie, taking over the case, had also commented that the crown attorney, should also "seek other solutions", other than a trial. And that this crown, John Flaherty, is proceeding with a trial based on the evidence of a single witness and with no other evidence to rely upon, other than the "credibility of the two witnesses". That is the defendant and the complainant in this case.



11. Judge J. Richie also denied the defendant the order requesting an audio copy of the hearing of the 11B application that was before him. Richie, "I am not going to grant you an order for the audio tape" (of the hearing on December 2, 2014). You have to wonder what he is afraid of in this case. Why he does not want the rest of the public to view his actions, in regards to that trial?).




12. Judge J. Richie, to the crown Attorney John Flaherty and the defendant, "The matter will proceed to trial on Thursday December 4th, on the merits.!". WHAT MERITS? This is a criminal case and not a civil case. There are no indisputable facts here. The crown attorney will have to prove the case and beyond a reasonable doubt. It is a he say, she say story. The defendant now has the full disclosure  and with the police written version of the events and also the video tapes (of the police conduct towards the defendant). And all of these are disputable facts. The substantive law on which the merits of the case is based on, is also not intended to be used in that manner, such as in a criminal case, where the facts of the case, has to be disputed and also proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In order to protect the defendant rights as well.





J. Richie also acted as part of a conspiracy to "get the defendant", by that court. To say that he has acted with a presumption of bias would also be an "understatement" in this case. This case was already decided, before Judge Richie even entered the courtroom and he was also not going to change anything about his decision.  This was also the reason why he would not adjourned the matter so that the other transcripts could also be obtained. He also excluded the most important ones.
 
WHY WOULD ANY JUDGE, RICHIE INCLUDED, WHO HAS ANY REGARD FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT, UNDER THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, ALSO AGREE, TO THE HEARING OF THE CHARTER APPLICATION, AFTER THE TRIAL! AS THE CROWN ATTORNEY JOHN FLAHERTY, HAS ALSO SUGGESTED?.





What has shocked me most about Judge Richie's actions is that he has completely accepted the words of the crown attorney John Flaherty, who has been lying all along. And this can also be proven by the evidence of the transcripts. By the time Flaherty came on the case in 2014, the other crown attorneys including Sonia Beaucamp, were also dealing with the case. In fact, for almost a year, Beaucamp was the crown attorney, who had also assigned herself to the case.


 She also made "numerous" statements to the court, about the disclosure of the video tape, specifically the cell video tape, by the police. From statements such as that she was "in contact with the police about it", to others that were also never considered by Judge Richie, because he also never allowed me to have the crown attorney cross-examined, at a prior motion, deeming it, "unnecessary". Or to have the other transcripts that would also contained her comments. In fact, Sonia Beaucamp's testimony, or evidence, was crucial to the case. As it would also established the circumstances surrounding the delay of the video by the police and which crown attorney John Flaherty also lied so much about.



It was the crown attorney Sonia Beaucamp who also "sneaked" the matter into the 'plea court' on February 14, 2014, after the crown pre-trial with her and also without my knowledge. And when I had learned of why the case, was later moved to the 'plea court' by this crown attorney, I also decided that I was not going to plead guilty on the charge of assault that they were also alleging.  Later on, Sonia Beaucamp also provided the current crown attorney, John Flaherty with copies of her request to the police to provide the video tape.  This was in February of 2014 and after months of getting excuses from crown attorney Sonia Beaucamp, as to why the police would also not provide the cell video. Eleven months to be exact. I was to wait another four months before the police also decided to release the said video. Which was also done in May of 2014. (A 15 month delay by the crown attorney and the police). Yet I was later to be blamed for the delay by the crown attorney John Flaherty, even though he himself had provided the disclosure of the video on that date.



This judge's actions are also bordering on the bizarre. He is either completely corrupt, or he does not know what the hell that he is doing?.  His own interpretation and also application of the law, can leave a defendant in serious trouble.  Judge J. Richie's decision on the 11B application before him, clearly exonerated the police and the crown attorney from any wrongs associated with the case.

Judge Richie in regards to his decision on my case, has also ruled that it is alright if the police abused the defendant, or the defendant's rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and also to abuse the process of the court as well. Judge Richie has also been the subject of other investigations, in regards to his decisions.



Richie also does not seem to know, or to care what the Charter of Rights and Freedom, is all about. That it was intended to protect the individual rights and freedom of the person.  That the defendant's right to a speedy trial, or of the defendant's rights to liberty and the security of person, should also be considered by the judge, first and foremost and also above the arguments of the crown attorney, or prosecutor. I am talking here from personal experience, though there are also plenty of other testimonials, about this judge's actions, in other places, for others to view.

The Toronto Star in its expose on J. Richie also came to the same conclusion. That he is also an incompetent judge and that the fact that he has also been "upbraided" at other times, by the Judicial Review Council, in regards to his conduct, which is also of little comfort for the defendants, who also appear before him and who has also made those complaints about him to the Judicial Review Council.  All of which was also shrouded in secrecy, until the newspaper decided to challenge the Review Council, on why it would not disclose to the public, when such judges, like J. Richie, does any wrong and which also caused serious harm to the public?.




A copy of the request that crown attorney Sonia Beaucamp, has made to the 14 division Toronto police, for the cell video, after months of even acknowledging that it even existed. The crown attorney had also produced a copy of a "booking video" earlier, that could not even be read "on any other computer" but the crown attorney's and also the police. The Justice of the Peace even acknowledged in open court that this was not the first that he had heard of the crown attorney and the police also producing a video that was also impossible to be viewed by anyone else but the two of them.  I later received a second copy of the 'booking video" but still no copies of the "cell video" until much later in the proceeding. In the cell video the police also abuse me and my rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This should have also had an impact on the trial, but not according to Judge J. Richie, in deciding on the 11B application, that was also before him. 


Note: In this document is the use of my maiden name. But it still refers to me.

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

CANADIAN BLACKS ALSO FACED RACISM IN THE COURTS.

WHY ARE THEY KILLING OUR BLACK CHILDREN?

FURGESON, MISSOURI, USA. WHERE A GRAND JURY, HAS FAILED TO INDICT, A WHITE POLICE OFFICER, DARREN WILSON, IN THE MURDER OF AN UNARMED BLACK TEENAGER, MICHAEL BROWN.

 
As the mother of a 24 year old black man, I am more than concerned, with what is going on in the United States, concerning the killing of black males, by white police officers and that those murders are also condoned by the courts.

It says many things about how society also regard the lives of our community. They are of no value to the system, that is also destroying them and it is nothing more than genocide. And we are also supposed to just sit back and do nothing. Where did they get that from?.

Poet, Nikki Giovanni's poem, "Nigg-- can you kill?", "Can a nigg-- kill a white man?", should be taken back up off of the shelf and dust off and be read by every black man, today.  They need to learn how to fight back. Giovanni also said that, "The best answer to violence, is a response". I also agree. And violence can also take many forms. If blacks were killing whites at the rate that they are killing us, there would be more equilibrium to this problem. But we are not like that.

We are the more forgiving kind and that is also to our own detriment. Some of us are also not that forgiving. Especially when we have to sit back and are also expected to do nothing, about the violence that are being perpetrated against us, on a daily basis. We should be sufficiently concerned for the lives and also for the future of our black children, to fight back.

It is a brutal system that we are also fighting. One that is designed to make our existence less than humane. Do those who are killing us also regard us in the same manner, as themselves?. No. If they did they would not be bent on eliminating us as a race. Whether that destruction, is also taking place in Canada, The United States of America, or Africa.

Michael Brown, was just an unarmed black teenager, who according to the white police officer, Darren Wilson, who also shot and killed him, on August 9, 2014, was also alleged to have taken part in a robbery earlier. Wilson story also kept changing, right up to his testimony to the grand jury, on November 24. His fanciful tale about the killing of the black teenager, was also designed, to get him off a murder charge.  Sadly, it was also backed up by the police chief, of Ferguson, Missouri. A suburb of St. Louis, Missouri.  That little community, is also 70 percent black. And of the 50 police officers on its police force, only 3 are also black. It is a scenario, that is also repeated, right across the US and not just in that small town.

The Michael Brown story, is by no means an isolated case.  It happens all of the time in the US, where white police officers are by now, used to killing  unarmed black men. The killing of Michael Brown, the eighteen year old teenager, by another white police officer, has also resonated with the black community, in the same way, as the murder of Treyvon Martin. Another unarmed black teenager, who was also killed by a white cop.  Or with the shooting of Amadou Diallo, another unarmed black man, who was also shot 41 times, by four police officers in New York.

As a community world wide, we should also be concerned at the rate at which this society is killing our youths. And for those who think that blacks fare any better in Canada, than in the United States, they should also look at the statistics here as well, in the killing of unarmed black men.  One of the most recent, was of the killing of Jerome Carby, who was shot to death at a routine traffic stop, by the Brampton police. 

All that the Brampton police wanted to do in that case, was to also carry out their own form of justice, in regards to Jermaine Carby. They felt that they had a right to kill him, since he was also alleged to have been involved in other criminal activities, in another province. And in their minds, he had also escaped justice, in regard to that case. So they shot him multiple times, after running his license plate, through their data base, at a routine traffic stop.

What we also need to know is that this kind of racism that is being perpetrated against us, as a community, has also not stopped with the killing of our back youths.  Anyone of us who are intelligent enough to question the barbarity, that is being perpetrated against us, are also slated for elimination and destruction.

Take this writer for instance. Right now, as I speak, there also is a conspiracy, in the Canadian court against me, to not only disregard my rights under the law, but also to destroy me outright. They want to silence me. I must mention here the Judge, J. Richie, of the Old City Hall court in Toronto, in the most recent case, and based on his actions so far, is also bent on carrying out this conspiracy against me.  I will also go into much more details about that case, in another upcoming article and also video. It is also necessary to do so.

Racism in the Canadian courts against blacks, is just as bad as what is going on in the United States of America, concerning the plan to either kill us outright, incarcerate us, or to carry out other kinds of acts against us, that should also be regarded as an act of genocide against us, as a people. Regardless of the country that we are living in.

There will be no trial for the white police officer, Darren Wilson, in the killing of Michael Brown. The grand jury has decided against indicting the police officer in his death. In which many also believe was based on the evidence, that was also presented by the prosecutor, to not indict the officer. And also based on the tainted relationship, between the prosecutor and the Ferguson, Missouri, police department.  Nor will there be a closure, any time soon, to the grieving parents of this teenager.

This writer is obviously, also, not cut from the same cloth, as the parents of either Michael Brown, or Trayvon Martin, who it seem has also been cajoled into remaining quiet, about the crime that was perpetrated against them, by the courts and by the rest of white society. There would be hell, fire and brimstone, should they be foolish enough, to try to harm any of my three children.

Friday, November 14, 2014

SOME OF THE BLACK CANDIDATES, FOR THE BRAMPTON CITY COUNCIL, HAS ALSO LOST BADLY.

TO MY KNOWLEDGE, NO BLACK CANDIDATES, HAS WON A SEAT ON CITY COUNCIL, IN THE RECENT ELECTION, IN THE CITY OF BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA. I ALSO WONDERED, WHY THAT IS THE CASE? THEIR OWN COMMUNITY, NEED TO ALSO BELIEVE IN THEIR SINCERITY, AS WELL. MANY ARE NOT CONVINCE AND ALSO DO NOT COME OUT AND VOTE FOR THEM.

Steve Kerr, running for a council seat, also came
in second in his riding, with over 3,000 votes.
This was also his second lost, in two years.


Andre Levy, a candidate for Brampton City Council,
has also lost badly, in the recent election.









































Several weeks before the people of Brampton has set out to vote, in the October 27, 2014 election, I was also contacted, by one of the candidates that was also running for office, Andre Levy. He is black and also a single parent and he was running for the office, of a city councilor. He had also asked me to give him some kind of exposure on my Blog. Now, I do not know this man, personally and I also like to get to know the people, that I am also promoting here on my Blog, even just a bit. Just in case they also turn out to be a phony.

Which is also what I believe about this man. Along with his friend Steve Kerr, whom I had also met previously and had also given some exposure on my blog.  Only to be disappointed, by what I also believed to be his cowardly action, when confronted with some of his personal beliefs. His statement to me, personally, that "He is not an advocate for the black community", did not sit well with me. He later told me that I had also taken it out of context, which I do not believe was the case.

Actually, I had done more than to promote Steve Kerr here on my Blog. I also did some work for him, by spending hours, volunteering, on a document that he also wanted done, in order to get some funding for his campaign.  Funding, that I also discovered, was also coming from a union source, or sources. And which he was also willing to deny some of his personal beliefs, in order to get that money for his campaign.  He was later to deny even knowing me, much less to acknowledge my contribution to his campaign. But it is all good. I still wish him well on his campaign, which he has also lost in the October 27th election, for a council seat.  This is also his second lost.  In 2010 he also lost the election for city councilor, of Brampton.

You see, Steve Kerr, who has also volunteered in the Canadian prisons, including the new "Super Jail", on Mclaughlin Road, in Brampton (And which he has also mentioned to me, including the fact, that, 80 percent of the youths, in that super jail are black), also did not want me to mention this fact. I said to him, "Steve, you have to mention this, as well". He was too concerned that it would also affect the funding for his campaign.

Working as a volunteer for his campaign, I also gave him an ultimatum. He is either to mention that fact, or that the document that I was working on for his campaign, would also remained on my computer and he would also not have it, after my six hours of laboring on it. He also acquiescence and said that I could mention it, but to also word it differently.  He later came to my home and picked up the document. I think that he also got the funding. I don't know about that.

He also made the distinction between he and I, by also saying that he was,"Not an advocate for the Black community", as opposed to me, I believe, since I also represent my community, and not just the broader society. (My son who is 24 years old, has also told me to 're-think' about that, since I also get no support from my own community, through fear of reprisal, I also believed, from the Canadian authorities,or that they are just plain wicked).

My reason for supporting both of those candidates, was the fact that I also believed, that the Brampton City Council, also needed more diversity, in its politicians and the fact that those two candidates, are also a part of the Black community, which also cause them to automatically gain my support. Which was also a mistake on my part.

My belief is that with the two of them, personal ambition also came before the need of the public and especially those of their own community.  Perhaps, they have also learned in this campaign, that, with the support from their own community and not just the larger community, they also have a much better chance of winning.


DESPITE WHAT 'FORD NATION' AND ROB FORD HIMSELF, HAS CLAIMED. TORONTO HAS HAD ENOUGH, OF ROB FORD, AS THE MAYOR. 

IF THE PUBLIC HAD ANY DOUBTS, ABOUT WHAT THE TWO FORD BROTHERS, ARE UP TO AT CITY HALL, THEN THIS PICTURE OF COUNCILLOR DOUG FORD, SITTING IN THE MAYOR'S CHAIR AND REPLACING HIS ABSENT BROTHER, ROB FORD,S NAME, WITH HIS OWN, SAYS IT ALL.  SO THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE UP TO. 

SO DOUG FORD HAS HIS EYES SET ON THE MAYOR'S 
CHAIR, ONCE HIS BROTHER LEAVE OFFICE. 




THE DECEPTION OF THE FORD BROTHERS,
INCLUDE, HAVING THE PUBLIC BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE 'TWO REGULAR GUYS'
WHEN IN FACT, THEY ARE MILLIONAIRES
POSING AS, 'ONE OF THE COMMON PEOPLE.

Councillor Doug Ford's habit, of handing out 'twenty dollar bills' to the people, who lives in the impoverished neighborhoods, in Toronto, is just another way of buying their support.



Based on the conduct of his brother, Rob Ford, as the Mayor of Toronto, and whose side he has also taken, regarding his very bad behaviour, Councilor Doug Ford, seem to also have aspirations for the Mayor's job. It will be too much for the people of Toronto to deal with, I believe. His brother did nothing wrong in his own eyes, so it will be more of the same from this Ford family.  And the people has had enough of the two of them, quite frankly.

Rob Ford is also supposed to be in rehab, in some facility in the United States, but was also turned back at the border, due to his past criminal convictions in that country. On Tuesday May 6, a picture was taken of someone who looked just like Rob Ford, right here in Canada, in one of the suburbs of Toronto. The picture was taken of a man who looked to be the Mayor of Toronto, behind the wheels of a van, that also look like the Mayor's own vehicle and who was also wearing dark glasses. There are also other sightings of Rob Ford, in Toronto and its surrounding areas. One notable sighting of the Mayor, was at the Tim Horton's Donut Shop. How convenient


November 14, 2014
UPDATE:  Rob Ford is now gone, as the Mayor. He is  now preoccupied with battling a deadly form of cancer, and his brother Councilor Doug Ford, has also lost his bid for the former Mayor's seat. Rob Ford did manage to keep his seat in council, in the recent election, along with his brother.  But really, Torontonians are relieved, that he is no longer the mayor of the city.

(This article was written way back in May of last year. I did some editing and the damn thing is showing up on my recent page). This is not new information people, except the 'updated version', in regards to the recent election). Hope to fix this 'recurring' problem on my Blog soon. It is also quite annoying, to say the least.



WHY DON'T THE IACHR, JUST DISAPPEAR? LIKE "PUFF, BE GONE, YOU'RE A WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT".

Do I sound angry? That is because I am. And I also have every reason to be, where that organization is concerned. It wants to continue to stay, in existence, no doubt and after doing what? By barely acknowledging the complaints, that are coming out of some countries, like Canada, with regards to human rights abuse?


This is a letter that I have received, from the IACHR, recently. I don't know if I should respond, with some glaring words of expletives, or to just to ignore it.. Or if I should also in the interest of human rights, give it some more consideration.

I suspect that this letter, may have also came, by way of some intervention, after contacting a particular source and also mentioning, casually, the IACHR's involvement in my case. It may have also contacted them and this was the result, because this letter also came right on the heels, of that incident. Or it may also be a coincidence. Which I also don't think is this case, because of the mention of the names of the very two people, who are also assigned to my petition, regarding the Canadian government's human rights abuse, in my case and with the IACHR. Its good to know that they are also monitoring that situation in that country.

Perhaps, I should show up and say, "Well, the IACHR, did nothing in my case, so fuck off!" It didn't help either, that it also spelled my name wrong.

I may also want to view the matter, as being beyond my own personal situation, in this case and also to comply with the request. I am still deliberating on this. My own case, however, I will also take up further, with the IACHR, after this letter.

Anyone who wishes to contact me, about their own case, involving human rights abuse, in order for those issues to be addressed, by the IACHR, at the conference coming up on November 22-23, 2013, should also contact me further, if they also want to participate, by having the delegation that will be attending, also address some of those issues. As part of the overall system of human rights violations, that some people are facing in Canada presently. Be those police violence and abuse, such as racial profiling, or other forms of systematic abuse, that also affect the individual personally. Or as belonging to a particular group, who is also adversely affected, by those discriminatory actions.
Telephone: 416 604 6924

Saturday, November 8, 2014

CANADIAN POLICE BRUTALITY. WAS ALL OF THAT FORCE NECESSARY?.

REMEMBERING, JERMAINE CARBY. THE BLACK MAN WHO WAS ALSO MURDERED, BY THE BRAMPTON POLICE, ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2014. TODAY, NOV. 8, 2014, THERE IS ALSO A RALLY, OR MEETING, AGAINST THE BRAMPTON POLICE, IN REGARDS TO HIS DEATH.
Jermaine Carby, shot multiple times, by the Brampton Police. He was murdered
by the Brampton police on September  24, 2014, at a routine traffic stop.


























THE ARREST, OF A BLACK YOUTH, BY THE POLICE.
THAT IS PROBABLY 300 POUNDS OF PRESSURE ON HIS HEAD.



Gee, that was fun. Is that another black youth over there? Let's go guys!.

Friday, October 24, 2014

CANADA'S FALSE FLAG OPERATION. THE OTTAWA SHOOTING AND THE MASS HYSTERIA, PROPELLED BY THIS PROPOGANDA.

LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES.  WHY THE PUBLIC IS NOT BEING TOLD THE TRUTH.

IT IS AN EXERCISE IN PUBLIC DECEPTION, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS PROPOGANDA.

WHEN YOU ARE CONSIDERED, AMONG THE SO-CALLED, TOP TEN NATIONS OF THE WORLD, YOU MUST ALSO DO WHAT YOU CAN, TO RETAIN THAT TITLE.  HENCE, CANADA'S ROLE, IN THE LATEST PUBLIC DECEPTION, CALLED "TERRORIST ATTACK", ON ITS OWN SOIL, WHICH IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PUBLIC DISPLAY, OF THE USUSAL EVILS THAT IT ALSO CARRIES OUT, ON A REGULAR BASIS.


We are now familiar with the story, of Michael Zehaf Bibleau, the lone gunman who was killed on Wednesday, October 22, 2014 on Parliament Hill, in Ottawa, Canada, in what I believe to be nothing more than a False Flag Operation, that was also carried out by the Canadian government, in order to prepare the public, for many more of such attacks.

Canada, of course, do not want to be left behind, in these military exercises and in regards to its totalitarian and police state. It has to play its part directly and to play "catch up" with its allies, such as the U.S., Australia, Britain and other countries, who are doing the same. But it need to also spare us from its hypocritical stance, regarding the so called 'terrorist attack' on its own soil, as if we do not have the intelligence ourselves, to figure it all out.

All such False Flag operations has its victims and both Cpl. Nathan Cirillo and also Michael Zehaf-Bibleau, the gunman in this case, are the victims in this mastermind, of the Canadian government. Cirillo was the Canadian soldier that was killed, while guarding the memorial of the dead. And now he has also joined them. Zehaf-Bibleau on the other hand, is the shooter and the alleged "terrorist", who was induced, either by drugs, or by mind control, to carry out certain acts of terror, which in fact are also carefully orchestrated, to deceived the public.  And then kill him afterwards to either shut him up and to hide the evidence (as with the Timothy McVeigh scenario), or to show that the Canadian government, is "on top of the game".  That is, that, the so- called terrorists won't win. 

The real truth is that the only 'real' terrorists that exist, are the ones who are running our governments and who also carry out untold acts of terror, daily, on innocent civilians. So spare us this melodrama
and with it also the spurious words, of the Prime Minister Steven Harper, which also has not one drop of sincerity.

And since we are speaking of terrorist acts, let us not forget about an organization that exist presently called ISIS, that is all about terrorism. You see, ISIS, is a creation of the U.S. government's CIA and it is also nothing more than the 'extended' arms of that country, as well as some others, including Israel, Britain and also Canada and other allied nations, in the Middle East.  It exist to carry out the agenda of those nations. How does this all ties in with the present Ottawa shooting?  Because I also believe that part of the agenda of the globalists, including the Canadian Prime Minister, Steven Harper, is also a separation of Canada.  They mean to separate Quebec from the rest of Canada. Harper has no more allegiance to Canada, than Barak Obama, as president has to the United States of America.  It is all about a one world government, which they are all a part of.

And False Flag Operations, like the one we have also just witnessed, in regards to the Ottawa shooting, is also part of their agenda. Victims are pre-selected and those that are considered expendable, are the one who ended up being publicly 'euthanized'. Actually, sacrificed would be a better word to use here, on behalf of the victims. Terrorists, are the ones who are actually carrying out 'terrorist activities'. I can't think of any more terrorist activities, than what the Canadian government, is also carrying out, QUIETLY, against its own citizens.

 NOTE:  Until the United Nations takes the complaints that are coming from victims of horrific human rights abuse such as torture in Canada, that are being carried out quietly, against citizens and against their will, then the belief also that Canada, does not carry out Crimes Against Humanity, is a farce.  To take away someone's dignity as a human being and to subject them to inhumane treatment, and then to pretend that you also uphold human rights, is a betrayal that must not be ignored by international organizations. To me, those are terrorist acts by the government.

Thursday, October 9, 2014

BRAMPTON PEEL POLICE, MANJIT DHILLION AND OTHER BRAMPTON CITY OFFICIALS, IN THEIR CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION.



RACISM AGAINST BLACKS, BY THE BRAMPTON PEEL POLICE, SOUTH ASIAN AND CAUCASIAN POLICE OFFICERS.
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10204775508778368&l=5896724501529465773

Constable Brandon Fraser
Baljiwan Sandhu, A Detective Sergeant with the Peel Police.























Caucasian and South Asian Police Officers in the Canadian Forces. 
THE CORRUPT BRAMPTON PEEL POLICE, IS IN THE BUSINESS OF EVICTING TENANTS, ON BEHALF OF LANDLORDS, LIKE MANJIT DHILLION. INSTEAD OF ALLOWING THE COURTS TO DO SO.

FIND SOME CHARGE, TO CHARGE THE TENANT WITH, SO THAT HE, OR SHE HAS TO MOVE OUT AND THEN GIVE THE PROPERTY BACK OVER TO THE OWNER. AS EASY AS ONE, TWO, THREE. DONE. BUT MORE CHARGES ARE ALSO FORTHCOMING, AGAINST THE POLICE AND THE CITY OFFICIALS, WHO ARE ALSO INVOLVED, IN THIS CONSPIRACY, WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER, MANJIT DHILLION.

POLICE HARASSMENT AND CORRUPTION, THAT HAS ALSO HIGHLIGHTED, THE CITY OF BRAMPTON'S POLICE DEPARTMENT, REGARDING THEIR BRUTALITY, RACISM AND CORRUPTION.

After posting this video, a few days afterwards on Monday October 6, 2014, the Brampton Police, 22 Division, then came to my home and broke down my door and arrested me inside of my home and also without a warrant.  Outside the door the officer, Badge # 3760 was saying that his reasons for wanting to enter my home without a warrant, was so that the landlord could remove a clothes dryer, that is also a part of my lease. (And also without giving me prior notice to do so). He also said that there were "live wires" which also did not exist.

After saying that, the door lock was then smashed in by the same cop and he then entered my home and arrested me (and also assaulting me physically in the process). The charge was for mischief, for turning the air condition off, that has been going on, for 24 hours a day for several weeks, since September 15th, when the heat should have been on. (See the details of the video posted here). And how I could also not get the other city officials involved to also act, to have my heat turned on, by the other two white tenants, who had the heat turned off and the air condition going, instead of the heat.

When I had called the same police just two days prior to them breaking down my door, about the white tenants turning off the heat, I was told by them (dispatcher badge # 1779), that it was not a criminal matter, but a "civil matter" and that the police would not be attending. However, it turned into a criminal matter for me, to turn the air condition off, that was also making me sick, and to be arrested and charged for doing so. The white tenants were also not charged for turning the heat off, and the air condition on, in the first place.

This is not just police bias, but open racism in this case. And also against me.

THE BRAMPTON POLICE 22 DIVISION, ALSO DENIED ME ACCESS TO MEDICAL TREATMENT, WHILE IN THEIR CUSTODY ON OCTOBER 6TH. I HAD NEEDED MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR BOTH THE ASSAULT AND ALSO FOR MY HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE, WHICH THEY ALSO KNOW OF AS BEING A PRE-EXISTING AND ALSO CHRONIC CONDITION THAT I HAVE. 

NO AMOUNT OF REQUEST ON MY PART COULD GET THEM TO TAKE ME TO THE HOSPITAL FOR TREATMENT OF MY MEDICAL CONDITION THAT WAS NOW AGGRAVATED BY THE STRESS BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE ARREST AND THE ILLEGAL ENTRY INTO MY HOME (WITHOUT A WARRANT), BY THE BRAMPTON POLICE, ON OCTOBER 6).

A BLACK YOUTH AT THE JAIL, WHO WAS ALMOST TASERED BY THE SAME BRAMPTON POLICE, (One of whom was also South Asian and the other Caucasian. The same as the two officers, both South Asian and Caucasian police, who had also arrested me).WHILE IN HIS CELL (BUT KNOWING THAT I WAS ALSO WATCHING THEM, THEY DID NOT GO AHEAD AND TASERED THE 16 YEAR OLD), BUT THEY DID THREATENED TO REMOVE HIS CLOTHING, WHILE HE WAS IN THE COLD CELL, AS A MEANS OF PUNISHMENT.

I HAD TOLD THE YOUTH THAT IF I HAD ALSO DIED, WHILE I WAS IN THE POLICE CUSTODY, FOR MY MEDICAL CONDITION, TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PUBLIC KNOWS, THAT I WAS ALSO REFUSED MEDICAL TREATMENT, BY THE BRAMPTON POLICE, 22 DIVISION. HE SAID THAT HE WOULD.

I am told by legal expert that the charge will not go anywhere, as I also had a right, to stop an action against me, that was also endangering my life, or my health and safety. As was also evident in this case.

THE MODUS OPERANDI OF THE BRAMPTON POLICE (AND THE POLICE OFFICER, ALSO TOLD ME THIS, DIRECTLY, UPON ARRESTING ME), WAS SO THAT I COULD MOVE OUT AND THE PROPERTY GIVEN BACK OVER TO THE LANDLORD, MANJIT DHILLON.

WHO JUST A FEW DAYS PRIOR, ALSO HAD AN ORDER MADE AGAINST HER, UPON MY REQUEST, TO TURN THE HEAT ON AND TO LOCK THE CONTROLS, SO THAT NO TENANTS COULD ALSO TURN IT OFF.  SHE ALSO DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORDER. LEAVING ME TO TURN THE AIR CONDITION OFF AND ALSO ENDING UP BEING CHARGED FOR IT. (IT WAS ALL PART OF THEIR PLAN. HERS AS WELL AS THE POLICE AND THE OTHER CITY OFFICIALS ALSO INVOLVED).

Note:  South Asians and particularly Sikhs, are a dominant ethnic group in the City of Brampton, Ontario.  And this is also reflected in the Brampton Police Force. They are also particularly known to act brutal and also racist towards Blacks. Which is also ironic, being a visible minority themselves.  One cannot deny their economic hold, or clout on that city as well, through the housing market and other businesses.


Friday, October 3, 2014

THE CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, INVOLVING MANJIT DHILLON AND CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

THE COVER-UPS, BY CITY OFFICIALS TO BY PASS HER ACTIONS, INVOLVING HER ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES, REGARDING HER RENTAL PROPERTY.

BRAMPTON CITY OFFICIALS IN THE ZONING BY-LAW DEPARTMENT, THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THE FIRE SERVICES DEPT, HAVE ALL WORKED TOGETHER, TO PREVENT THE FULL INVESTIGATION AND ALSO THE PROSECUTION, OF THIS PROPERTY OWNER.

Brampton City officials who are implicated in the conspiracy, corruption and the cover-up of this landlord, include, the Zoning By-Law Enforcement Officer, Victor Nybog, who is also at the center of this investigation. Catherine Goddard, Manager in the Zoning Department (Who seem to also be unaware of some of Victor Nybog's actions, concerning the investigation) and also the Director of department.

In the Building Department, these persons are involved in the conspiracy, corruption and the cover-up of Manjit Dhillon and her illegal activities regarding her properties.  Rick Conard, Manager and Melvin Ramkissoon, an investigator with that depratment.

In the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Enforcement Division, the following persons are also implicated in the conspiracy, corruption and the cover-up of the investigation of Manjit Dhillon. Jim Toretto, Manager of The Compliance Department and some of his staff, Cathy Trapanier, Maryam Cooper and Roel Pascual, of the Enforcement Division.  I have spoken to Jim Torreto many times and also find it difficult to understand, why he has never requested that any of his staff attend the property to carry out an investigation, regarding the heat, in regards to my complaint about the landlord Manjit Dhillon.  Not only that but his staff, Maryam Cooper and Cathy Trapanier, had also previously closed the file, only to have it reopened by Jim Torreto, upon my request about the heat and with nothing still being done to carry out the enforcement of this by-law, which is also considered to be a vital service, and must also be enforce.

WHY SHE HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED, THOUGH A NOTICE OF VIOLATION, WAS ISSUED TO HER SINCE JULY 21, 2014.

MANJIT DHILLON, HAS ALSO IGNORED AN ORDER, FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, TO TURN THE HEAT ON AND CONTINUES TO IGNORE THAT ORDER, WITH THE COOPERATION OF SOME BRAMPTON CITY OFFICIALS AND THOSE OTHERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, OF THE MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING.  



Manjit Dhillon "Tell her that I will pay her $600 to move out and that will also include removing the article on her blog about me". Information, as provided to me by the Mediator, at the Landlord and Tenant Board on September 30, 2014. I also declined her offer and also viewed it as not only as an attempt to bribe me, to not report on her actions to the public, (when they also become a matter of public interest), but also to harass me. The same day she was also ordered to turn the heat on, but has so far ignored that order and will be facing more charges for doing so.

AT THE CENTER OF THIS SITUATION ALSO IS THE OPEN RACISM THAT IS ALSO INVOLVED. RACIST ACTIONS THAT ARE ALSO BEING CONDONED BY BRAMPTON CITY OFFICIALS, THE BRAMPTON POLICE AND THOSE IN THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, OF THE MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING, TO ALLOW THE WHITE TENANTS AT THE PROPERTY, TO CARRY OUT THE ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES AGAINST ME, SUCH AS TURNING OFF THE HEAT (ON THE INSTRUCTION OF THE LANDLORD, MANJIT DHILLON) AND NOT TAKE ANY ACTIONS.

WHAT THEY ALL TRIED TO DO IS TO MOCK ME OPENLY, ABOUT THE MATTER. 

On September 30, 2014, an interim order was issued against her, to force her to turn on the heat to the rental property, which has not been turned on Since September 15, though it is also a mandatory action that she must also comply with. As a tenant at the rental property and also as a witness to this fact, this landlord, has also chosen to ignore this latest order, in an attempt to harass me to move out.

She also lied to government officials in the Enforcement Dept. with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, that she has been complying with the order. That of course is a lie. As of this date I have no heat. She was ordered to put a cover and a lock over the controls so that her other tenants could not access it in order to turn the heat off. She has not done so either.
What she has done instead is to harass me on a daily basis to move out by turning off the heat and to turn on the air condition instead. Imagine what that is like when the temperature reach as low as 4 degrees at night or sometimes in the mornings?. Manjit Dhillon is so certain of the immunity that is provided to her, because of the conspiracy and the corruption that is also involved with other city officials as well as the police, that she is not concerned at all about the reprecussions of her illegal actions, as far as I am concerned.

My obligation is not to Manjit Dhillon, or for that matter, to the Brampton police, or the other government officials, who has also worked with this criminal to further break the law, by providing her with the immunity to do so. will also be exposed for refusing to carry out their duties involving the investigation of this person.

This is also turning into a racist situation as well.  The other two tenants that I share the property with has also been turning the heat off, not only on her instructions, I also believe, but on the instructions of the police and other city officials, who are also involved in the investigation.  Instead of the heat, they turn on the air condition, which is also illegal.  Those tenants who are also white, has also been throwing garbage at my door and has also taken over my parking space, as a means of provocation by them. It is even more disturbing to me that the police are also behind their actions, as they could also be seen to be aiding them involving their criminal actions against me and also giving them the protection that need, in order to carry out this harassment against me. Manjit Dhillon as the landlord is behind their actions, I also believe as well.


Monday, September 15, 2014

A BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, LANDLORD, MANJIT DHILLON, ALONG WITH HER AGENT, AMIR DHIR, ARE FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR RELATED OFFENCES, INCLUDING, PRODUCING A DOCUMENT AT A HEARING, THAT WAS ALSO DISMISSED AS A FORGERY.

A Brampton, Ontario, landlord and  former real  estate  agent , has  been  charged with numerous criminal offences, relating to her illegal actions surrounding her properties. The charges include Disobeying a Statute, Criminal Negligence, Counselling Offence, Theft From Mail, Obstructing Justice, False Pretence and Conspiracy. Also charged, is Rajinder Dhillon her husband and partner in business , long with her agent, Amir Dhir. Dhir is facing two charges for Obstructing Justice and False Pretence.  He is also facing charges for providing, false information on an affidavit, and also during a legal proceeding, along with his two clients.
Manjit Dhillon
a former sales agent for Remax in Brampton
Ontario, Canada, has been charged with
numerous criminal offences.



All three accused has also produced an alleged copy of a document from Canada Post, showing this writer's signature that was also dismissed at the hearing as being false. Amir Dhir produced the document on behalf of his two clients, and also claim that it was received and also signed by this writer.  All three are also facing further charges of lying on an affidavit and making false statement on a legal document.








Friday, September 12, 2014

THE STORM IS BREWING AND IS ABOUT TO ERRUPT.

OLD CITY HALL COURT CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION LEADS
TO CHARGES, AGAINST SEVERAL JUSTICES OF THE PEACE AND
JUDGES, AT THAT COURT, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Charges are pending, in the International Criminal Court, against these defendants:
Justice of the Peace Getlich; Justice of the Peace Currie; Justice of the Peace Rizwan  M. Khan, Crown Attorneys, Sonia Beaucamp and John Flahery, and a slew of other Judges and Justices of the Peace, at the Old City Hall Court in Toronto, Ontario Canada. There are also criminal charges pending, against several Canadian police officers and other court staff at that court, including Roman Haruk, manager of court services and Lucy Fernandez, who is also a receptionist in the office of the justice of the peace and has also acted upon their instructions.  Also charged are also those other persons, in the Provincial Office of the Justice of the Peace at Old City Hall Court.  The criminal charges are for corruption, conspiracy and obstructing justice, in a legal proceeding.

The message is startlingly  clear. You have no rights that we must either consider or respect.
With that said, each of those individuals then also proceeded, to ignore, not only my so called guaranteed rights under the Canadian Constitution, that are also enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but also those other human rights under international laws.  I had simply had enough.  It was time for charges of corruption to be laid against all of them.

The latest actions of that court against me came about last week when I tried to exercise me right to lay a private information, and the mockery that ensued, in which the  information was also being repeatedly denied, by the justices of the peace at that court, using one excuse after another. Which has also led to legal proceeding being commenced against them. They were literally making a game of the whole thing. Including pretending not to be able to read the information before them. Telling me to type it up, (so that they could read, what was otherwise a legible handwriting).

It is a long standing issue that has also been going on for many years. It became too much for me to deal with on my own, as it also became abundantly clear that those involved, at the Old City Hall court, were also prepared to continue in their corruption against me.  Last week they had a field day mocking me openly.  From pretending to not being able to read the information before them, to changing the charges, directly from what was on my information and then also pretending that they were going to also proceed with it at a pre-enquette hearing, coming up on September 23, 2014, when both they and I also know that it was also a sham. They were only going to 'pretend' to have a pre-enquette hearing, and then toss the charges out. That has been their actions in the past. And the Justices of Peace at the Old City Hall court in Toronto, were also going to continue with this practice, if allowed to do so.  I felt that they should not be allowed to continue, to act in a criminal manner and to get away with it. It was time for a change to be made.  They must be charged under international law and held accountable for their actions.

The most obvious clue to this was when the secretary Lucy Fernandez tried to convince me that the charges were going to be kept a secret from the public and that I also could not retain a copy of those charges that I had laid, or rather that the JP had laid after changing it from the other original charges. He was only going to lay a Mischief charge against the accused Joanne Catinella and the co-accused Milton Huie. The other more serious charges of Criminal Negligence and Reckless Endangerment, as well as in Disobeying a Statue, were also not included in the information that was typed up, on the instructions of Justice of the Peace Currie. 

It is common practice for the informant to be given a copy of the information that they have laid, including the typed up version of the charges. This was not done in my case and I have stated what I also believed are the reasons for this, by the Old City Hall Court. They do not intend to proceed with the charges and are only 'going through the motions'. I was suppose to accept it as well, according to them.  I had a hard time believing, or accepting, what I was seeing unfolding before my eyes, in regards to the corruption of that court. 

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

CANADA DID NOT RATIFY, OAS TREATY, ON HUMAN RIGHTS.

CANADA MOCKS, OAS HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY, RESPECTING HUMAN RIGHTS.

According to articles 74-78 of the American Convention on Human Rights, that is also part of the Organization of American States, each member State is required to sign and also ratify the treaty, giving the organization and specifically the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the jurisdiction to prosecute any kind of human rights violations against that country.

What this means is that petitions from Canada, are not recognized by the court which lacks the jurisdiction to go after that country for human rights abuse. The question is why? Why would Canada sign up as a member and not also follow its mandate completely?  This leave human rights victims with no recourse with that court n order to deal with their grievances, against that country's human rights abuse.

According to Jose Vega, a law clerk with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, with whom I had spoken to recently, the court and also the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, which may also act if it also deem it necessary, in also a very limited capacity, can also not make Canada respect the laws governing human rights.

I have more to write on this topic, because of the negative and detrimental effect of that country's actions against human rights abuse victims in that country.

Thursday, July 17, 2014

POWER AND GREED OVER SAFETY: THE CITY OF BRAMPTON BASEMENT APARTMENTS.

TWO OF THE NEW, POSTER FACES, OF HOMEOWNERS FOR PROPERTY VIOLATIONS.

MANJIT DHILLON AND RAJINDER DHILLON. BRAMPTON ONTARIO, HOMEOWNERS AND OPERATORS, OF ILLEGAL BASEMENT APARTMENTS.

DON'T HAVE A PERMIT?. DO YOU NEED ONE FROM THE CITY? NEVER MIND THAT, WHEN THERE ARE OTHER WAYS, TO GET AROUND THE SYSTEM.  BESIDES, WHO WANTS TO PAY A  $7,000.00 FEE, TO GET AN APPROVAL, WHEN YOU DO NOT REALLY HAVE TO BOTHER WITH IT, RIGHT? 

Here are the city's specific guidelines concerning second units, or basement apartments, also referred to as 'nanny suites, 'granny flats', or accessory apartments.  And surprisingly, most also do not know that such an apartment, do not have to be situated in a basement, as such. But for the purpose of this article, I am taking about the ones which does.

The City’s Zoning By-law does not currently permit basement apartments or accessory units.  The only legal basement apartments are those that have existed since November 16, 1995 and have been registered or declared legal non-conforming by the City.  Any basement apartment built since November 16, 1995 is illegal in the City of Brampton.

Ever wondered why the government, city officials or any one else in authority, would ignore the actions of some people over those of others? It is also not as uncommon as you would think.  One rule governing the poor and another rule for those who are a little bit better off. 

Sometimes the information that I often report might seem innocuous, or even irrelevant to some, but believe me, it also helps those who are also going through the same ordeal, and most importantly, it help to put a curb on corruption in this country. This is not my first article on this subject and from the looks of it, it won't be my last either.  

Manjit Dhillon and her husband Rajinder Dhillon are both homeowners living in the city of Brampton.  They also fall into the category of homeowners, who has also rented out illegal basement apartments, that also do not follow the city's guidelines, including those for building code and fire safety regulations.  Do the police know this?.  Of course they do! Shockingly, I will also present proof of this by way of a letter, that was given to me, by the landlords Manjit Dhillon and Rajinder Dhillon, requesting entry into my home on July 18, 2014 in order to cover up the ventilation system. Covering up the vents is an obvious fire safety violation and this is also not a concern to either the police, who has instructed them to do so, or my landlord.

Furthermore, the structure is also not safe.  There is almost a daily power outage in my apartment, one of three separate apartments, two of which are located illegally in the basement of the bungalow house, that is also owned by them. Which also indicate a faulty electrical system, brought about by the additional two basement apartments, that the landlords has added to the existing building structure, simply for greed. That is, to make more money. The combined rental income for both, is $1600.00 monthly, excluding the other rental unit on the main floor of the bungalow.

Instead of addressing the problem of the electrical power outage and the short circuit of the building, they also want to make the problem worse by now adding an additional fire hazard to the existing problem. It is amazing what the police would also advise someone to do, when they think that no one will view their actions later on. The only instructions that those two landlords need to go on, are those under the Residential Tenancies Act, or the Building Code, Fire Code and the Zoning Bylaws, of the city of Brampton.  Not on the ill advice of the Brampton police. They are definitely not an authority on the matter, in terms of building codes, what can be added or not, by a landlord, in this case. Believe it or not, it was all done to get my response to the situation, since it also affects me personally. I intend to follow through on what the rights that I have as a tenant under the law, in case of any violations by those two landlords, or on any other laws that also applies in that situation.

Are Brampton's politicians, also ignoring the problem, of unsafe and illegal basement apartments, in order to please those homeowners, who also vote for them?. That seem to be the case here.

Since the passing of Bill 140 on January 1, 2012, that is called the Strong Communities Through Affordable Housing Act 2011, homeowners now believe, erroneously, that they also now have the right to keep basement apartments, which has never been approved by the city's zoning bylaws, and that all of them must also get an approval, from the city's adjustment committee, in order to change the structure of the original building. Even before the legislation was passed, the problem of illegal basement apartments in the city of Brampton, was a major one, with more than 30,000 illegal basement apartments existing, and operated by greedy landlords, who are not motivated for renting out their properties, by the housing shortage in that city, as it is claimed, but by the profits that they make, from renting out their private homes and turning them into rental dwellings.
And this without having to either to comply with any of the laws which also protects tenants, until they are forced to do so by the tenants, who knows enough about their rights to force them to do so.

Brampton city councilors has considered it a fair exchange in regards to getting the votes of those homeowners. And for the longest while they were also silent on the issue.  The one who also had a pecuniary interest in the matter, and I will also include those city councilors, from the Sikh community in Brampton, which is also one of the largest and most influential groups, in the city of Brampton, to have a role in the latest legislation being passed, to allow the existence of basement apartments, as an additional source of rental income, for homeowners.

It is not an attack against the Sikh community and I have been told to do some basic research on the subject before writing this article, which I also did. I casually went over the advertisement on some websites, such as Kijiji and Craiglist, to see just who were renting out those illegal basement apartments, the most to the public.
And to do the calculations as far as the percentage, of homeowners, from both Brampton and Mississauga's Sikh community, who are also responsible for those advertisements, in regards to those illegal basement apartments.  I have also done just that and found this to be true.  That 80-90% of those advertising such illegal basement apartments, are from that community. Decorated nicely, some of them, they still posed a safety risk, the most obvious to the naked eyes are the ones with no windows. The real danger from those apartments, however, are the pressures that they put on the existing electrical system, which is also part of the building fire code regulations. In the house that I live in that is the biggest problem with the greedy owners, Manjit Dhillon and her husband Rajinder Dhillon, having two such basement apartments, one a two bedroom and the other a bachelor apartment, with both of them also located in the basement of the bungalow house and each fully contained, with their own kitchen and bathroom facilities and not surprisingly also, they both also takes up the entire length of the lower structure of the house, which is also illegal, since any such unit must also be smaller than the space above it, as far as the main floor of the bungalow.

Unfortunately, there is also a power shortage and outage, in my apartment almost on a daily basis. The Brampton Fire Department and also the Municipal Standards and Zoning Bylaw Departments, are also investigating. The fines for any building code violations, including the ones for fire violations, is $25,000.to the landlords. One such landlord was recently fined $7000.00 by the city of Brampton, for such a violation.

I have enclosed a copy of the letter instructing me to let them enter my apartment in order to cover up the vents.  This is also part of the ongoing harassment from the police working with my landlord.  The police do not care if covering up the vents also posed a safety issue to me the tenant or not.  The idea is to cover my vent so that the other white tenants could have the  AC on 24/7.  But that issue will also dealt with by the appropriate avenues that are also available to me, as a recourse, in regards to that matter.  Including the Human Rights Commission, against both the landlords and the police. Interestingly, they also saw nothing wrong in giving keys to the mailbox, to the two white tenants and none to me, though I have also asked them repeatedly for one. That is also discriminating against me, as a tenant. It is also a very bad idea on the part of the landlord, Manjit Dhillon, since I am known to take people to court, for less actions than that.  No one ever told them about intercepting, or tampering with other people's mails, which is also illegal. 



 PROOF, OF THE CANADIAN POLICE, ONGOING                HARASSMENT, TOWARDS ME.

A  COPY OF THE LETTER/NOTICE, GIVEN TO ME BY MANJIT AND RAJINDER DHILLON, ON THE BRAMPTON POLICE'S INSTRUCTIONS. 

FOR THE LAST FEW DAYS, THE BRAMPTON POLICE, HAS BEEN BANGING ON MY DOOR AND USING AND INTIMIDATION, TO GET ME TO GIVE UP MY RIGHTS AS A TENANT. INSTEAD OF LEAVING THE MATTER UP TO THE LANDLORD AND TENANT TRIBUNAL TO DECIDE. 

PLEASE NOTE HERE, THAT, THE POLICE WAS NOT CARRYING OUT ANY ORDERS, OF THE COURT, OR TRIBUNAL. IT WAS ALSO NOT A FIRE SAFETY  ISSUE, THIS WAS THEIR OWN ADVISE TO THE LANDLORDS.

The police goal was that if I also refused, to let them act on their instructions, then it would also be grounds to charge me. The ventilation output, also already had covers.