Friday, August 30, 2013

Canadian Judges In A Jocose Mood. You Have To Ask The Question, What Is So Funny? Why Are They All Laughing and Where Is The Humour Coming From?

 PROTEST AGAINST THE COURTS AND CORRUPT JUDGES.
Where are they all going?   To hell I hope. (After destroying so many lives and
also reveling in injustices). I am being facetious, here, but who can also blame me?
 

 

 
 


 
 

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"I am from Germany and Canada, tainted beyond belief"
Professor Ewe Rhindhart.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

THE COURT IS TO BE CHALLENGED, ON AUGUST 21, 2013, ON THE RIGHT OF THE INDIVIDUAL, UNDER THE CHARTER.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, is part of the Canadian Constitution. It is also supposed to guarantee,  the equal treatment and also protect the rights, of every person living in Canada.

For some people, it is just a piece of paper, that has also becomes meaningless, when those inherent rights, are also ignored, or violated.

On August 21, 2013, I will be at the Court of Appeal for Ontario, to challenge the court, on those same rights, which are also supposed to be protected, under the Charter. It shouldn't be much of a challenge either, when the case is built on the simple fact, on a question of law only. Is there an automatic stay in place, for appellants, or applicants, who has continued with an appeal, from a lower court?. In this case the divisional court, to a higher court?  What are some of the issues of the case, surrounding that stay?  The main one is that it involved money, which some people, like lawyer David Strachin, wants to be dispensed with, by way of a motion judge's order. Not so fast. Since there are also material facts to be argued, which is not the jurisdiction, that a motions judge of the divisional court can decide on, in those cases. It usually goes to a trial, which is also dealt with by way of the evidence, that are also presented,by way of discovery. 

The divisional court also do not deal with matters of mix fact and law, but of matters dealing with issues of law only. That doesn't mean that it has never decided on those cases involving a great deal of evidence, which I also believe, involved mix fact and law. The case was appealed stating errors of law only, anyway. Those errors being the presumption of bias, by the previous tribunal and also a case of a lack of procedural fairness.  Both are also errors of law.

There is still no date as of yet, for the hearing of my motion for leave to appeal, in the court of appeal.  In the meantime, I want the court of appeal to reinstate the stay, that was also lifted by the order of the divisional court, until my matter is also concluded, in the court if appeal. I want the stay that was in place, to continue, as it should under the law, while my appeal is also before the court of appeal.

I want the Court of Appeal to reinstate me back into my home, which I was illegally evicted from on August 15, 2013, by the manager Joe Terrel, of the Toronto Sheriff office, even though his office also knew of the proceeding, in the court of appeal and that it was also ongoing. He chose to act peremptorily and to end my appeal on his own terms, and to not wait for the decision, of the court, regarding my motion for leave. He knew what he did was legally and also morally wrong and it was also injurious to me,causing me undue hardship. Which was also part of the conspiracy involved.

After residing in my coop for five years, I was surreptitiously evicted last year and while my matter was still before the court, as part of a conspiracy. It is also a repeat of the same thing, which I am now challenging legally again. 

Thursday, August 15, 2013

THE IACHR, IS HAVING SECOND THOUGHTS, ABOUT CANADA.

CHANGE THAT IS NEEDED NOW.






Human rights abuse, racism and discrimination, are all topics, that the Canadian government, wishes to avoid. It is also good that, the Inter American Commission on Human rights, is also finally taking the matter, about that country's human rights violations, seriously enough to investigate.

I have also had to view the matter, as being beyond my own personal situation, in this case and also will comply with the request,  My own case, however, I will also take up further, with the IACHR,

 

Sunday, August 11, 2013

TORONTO MAYOR, ROB FORD, POSING DRUNK WITH TEENAGERS, DURING CIVIC DUTIES.

A PANORAMIC VIEW OF CANADIAN POLITICS.

TORONTO MAYOR, ROB FORD, AT THE 'TASTE OF THE DANFORTH FESTIVAL', ON
AUGUST 9, 2013, WHERE HE WAS TO, COMMEMORATE, THE FESTIVITIES, AS THE MAYOR, BUT INSTEAD GOT DRUNK AND CAVORTED WITH THE YOUNG CROWD,
AND IGNORING HIS PUBLIC DUTY.  

ROB FORD, "I DON'T WANT TO GO UP TO THAT DANFORTH, LETS GO PARTY".

                              

This is the Mayor of Toronto, still, despite his lack of high moral standards. He is still in office and also planning to run, in the next election. Shame? He has none. He is a big fat bore. His role and also belief as the Mayor, is that its okay, to tell impressionable teenagers, that they can be as drunk, as they want in public and why not go further with that and show them how to smoke a crack pipe also?  The kids were also laughing, at the Mayor, in the video. The obvious reason, is that Toronto politics and its mayor, is also a joke.  Everyone should be laughing.


THE TORONTO MAYOR, ROB FORD'S, CRACK COCAINE VIDEO
(ITS NO LAUGHING MATTER)

The Toronto Star reporters, Kevin Donovan and Robin Doolittle, authenticates, what they saw in the video, of the Toronto Mayor, Rob Ford's crack cocaine video incident. Which now has all of the men, who has reportedly, tried to sell the video, of the Mayor, allegedly, smoking crack cocaine, either dead, or in prison and it has all happened, after they tried to "Take down the Mayor, Rob Ford". One of the three men was shot to death and the other two were quickly rounded up, on other drug related and murder charges. In the meantime, Rob Ford has also continued, to carry on with his shocking behaviour, and according to him, he has no intention, also, of leaving politics any time soon.


Anthony Smith, shot to death, after going
to reporters, with the video.




Mohamed Said, is in prison,on drug
charges. He was also stabbed and almost murdered
while in prison, over the Rob Ford, video scandal.
















Hanad Mohamed, is the third black man, involved in the
Rob Ford's, crack cocaine scandal. He is a facing murder charge,
in the death, of Anthony Smith, but has had the charge reduced,
by the crown attorney, to accessory to the fact. The evidence at
trial has also been banned. (To protect whom?) The Mayor, Rob Ford
 has so far, evaded, any charges related, to the crack cocaine video.  









Those who has seen the 'alleged' video of Rob Ford, smoking crack cocaine, included:
Toronto police officers, who has been investigating the video, after a year long wire tap, on the telephones, of the men involved. A US reporter, of a blog, Gawker, who has seen the video and has also raised over two hundred thousand dollars, to buy it. Reportedly, also, a defense attorney and a prosecuting attorney.  So why hasn't Rob Ford been charged with a crime?  And why is he still in office and the people surrounding the video, has ended up in prison, instead of the mayor?
.
OTHER CORRUPT CANADIAN POLITICIANS

Montreal Mayor, Michael Applebaum, Faces Corruption Charges.










Unlike the Mayor of Toronto, Rob Ford, Montreal's Mayor, Michael Applebaum, has been arrested, and is facing 14 criminal charges, of corruption. The charges also included, fraud, conspiracy, breach of public trust, and especially, corruption in municipal affairs. He is accused of taking bribes, in regard to some real estate deals, and also before he was a mayor. So why did the Quebec, anti-corruption unit, targets Applebaum, if he was not an elected official, at the time of those, alleged, offences? According to Robert Lafreniere, the Commissioner, of the anti-corruption unit, "We can no longer tolerate, these reprehensible acts, committed toward the management, of our public institutions", says the Commissioner, "No one is above the law and you can't hide from the law". Lafreniere, also went on to say, that, "...All actions, that compromises the integrity, of the state are unacceptable".  Clearly, Quebec also has a different set of standards, than Ontario, when it comes to, politics. 

How else can an elected city official, like Mayor Rob Ford, also get off on such charges, as conflict of interest, domestic abuse, and also being embroiled, in drug scandals and all while being a mayor?. And those are just  a few, of the Toronto Mayor's indiscretions. The public has had to put up, with a Mayor, of such low standard, that they have also now, come to accept it, as normal behaviour, from a public official. 

These Montreal politicians were also charged with corruption:



Saulie Zajdel, who was a former candidate, for the Federal Conservatives, and also worked, on ethnic outreach, has been charged with fraud, breach of public trust and corruption.







Jean Yves Bisson, a Director of Permits, charged with fraud, breach of public trust, payment of secret commissions and corruption.


                                

  Gilles Vaillancourt, a former Mayor, of Laval, Quebec
  charged with fraud and gangsterism.                                               
                                                               
















The Difference between Quebec and Ontario, over corruption charges and its politicians. One get results and the other do not. The Ontario government should also start, by taking the actions, of such politicians as Rob Ford, quite seriously, who has made a mockery of the public trust, and has also no desire to stop, being a nuisance.

I have always liked Quebec, better, than the rest of english speaking Canada. And I still think that if Quebec, also separates, from the rest of Canada, it will also be good, for that province. It should be an autonomous State, not just because of the language, but also its culture. 














Saturday, August 10, 2013

KATE MIDDLETON'S PHONY PREGNANCY.

                      Kate Middleton, in high heels.


A 'Pregnant' Kate Middleton, playing ball.



The 'suicide' that was perhaps a murder. What led to the death, of nurse, Jacintha Saldana? Did she know too much
about Kate Middleton's visit to the hospital?.


Nurse, Jacintha Saldanha, in front of the King Edward VII
hospital. A private hospital for the royal family.




The world has been deceived, about Prince William and kate Middleton's new baby. Conspiracy theorists, like me, also believed, that Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge, was never pregnant in the first place. Yes, It is all a hoax. Kate Middleton, like Beyonce, has faked her so called pregnancy, to fool everyone. But why? Why did Prince William and his wife, the Duchess of Cambridge, pretended, to be having a baby and a royal heir to the throne, after his father, Prince William, if that isn't the case?

There are many conspiracy theories, about this very question. Some of the answers also make sense. The most common one, is that Kate and William, Old Wills, has to a use a surrogate mother to bear their child, because Kate, cannot get pregnant naturally, or she refuses to become pregnant, for superficial reasons. Like not wanting, to go through the natural changes, that a woman's body go through, during pregnancy. I tend to believe the first theory, that they cannot have a child, on their own by natural means, and so they had to use a surrogate mother, to bear the baby for them. Whatever the reasons, are, they have also deceived, the majority of the people, because their new baby, George, was also not born to Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge.  The major give away, was the unnatural baby bump, after her so called delivery, of the baby.
Not freaking real in a million years.

Listen, I have had three children, or has given birth three times, and many other women can also attest to this fact, that though you may have considerable weight gain, around your belly, during and after pregnancy, it doesn't look as firm as that. Kate Middleton's stomach looked as round and firm, as if she was still pregnant.
The other clues, that she was faking her pregnancy, all along, is her slim figure. No weight gain on her face and on her ankles, as with most other pregnant women.  Likewise, she also carried out her full engagements, as a royal and this was what really gave the whole shenanigan away. Wearing high heels and doing a lot of risky things, without a hint, of any danger, that it could also posed, to either she, or the baby. How many women can wear high heels, during their final month of pregnancy?. Not too many, unless you are also faking it. Did Kate Middleton, had a miscarriage instead and was also forced, to go along with this deception, to please her royal in-laws? Is the suicide of the nurse, Jacintha Saldanha, to Prince William and Kate also tied in with this pregnancy?  Was it really a suicide, or murder?. And was she murdered because she knew too much?. Jacintha was the nurse at the hospital, at the time that the Duchess was also admitted there, for allegedly, having morning sickness. Some people believed that the Duchess of Cambridge, was not at the hospital because of morning sickness, but for some other reasons, perhaps for an in vitro fertility treatment, and that the nurse got a hold of this secret, so she had to be murdered, to cover it up.

Prince William is no different, from the rest of the royals, who are also principal players, in the New World Order, or the one world government. The British royal family, also want to remain as it is, so they will also do, whatever is necessary, to keep their current position. Even lying and also creating one of the biggest hoaxes, the world has ever seen, with this so called pregnancy.  Some people are starting to catch on, and others are also wondering, in disbelief, if they also had the nerve to pull this one off.  Apparently they do.

Two final questions, that I am sure will leave many people, also wondering the same thing. Why has Kate Middleton, not hired a nanny for the baby and why did she also went to her parent's home, to live with the new baby?

Friday, August 2, 2013

TORONTO LAWYER, ALLISON MACPHERSON, ACTIONS, SHOULD BE EXPOSED, FOR CORRUPTION.

CROWN ATTORNEY, ALLISON MACPHERSON, AT 1000 FINCH AVENUE COURT,
BLOCKS CHARGE, AGAINST AN ACCUSED, IN A CONSPIRACY, TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.

How do you as a crown attorney, blocked a charge, against an accused person, when there are witnesses, to the fact? When one of the witnesses, is also a law enforcement officer. A bylaw officer in this case, who has also witnessed the attack, by the accused, against the victim? Who was also carrying out, supposedly, an
investigation, against the accused, at the same time. How do you maneuver the law, so as to pervert justice, in such a case? If you are like Allison MacPherson, who is a Crown Attorney at 1000 Finch Avenue West, courthouse in Toronto, the answer is quite easy. You do that in a court room, where there are no other members of the public, allowed, in that courtroom and then you dispensed, along with your co-conspirators, like the Justice of the Peace, Tihiri, your brand of justice. After all, no one is watching. It is a close court hearing.

Well, they almost got away with it, but not quite. You see, the informant, who was laying the private charge, for which they went to such extent, to prevent, is also a journalist and blogger, in this case and would also not missed the opportunity, to exposed their actions, to the public.  I am talking about this writer, who once again, was prevented from exercising her legal rights, as everyone else, due to the elaborate conspiracy, which also involved the Canadian courts, to prevent her from doing so. 

The incident happened, on July 29, 2013, when the informant, also tried to exercised her legal rights, to charge someone, who has attacked her and assaulted her, as well as to violated her rights. Believing, also, that having a witness, who was there at the time of the attack and who was ready to testify, on her behalf, would also allowed the charge to go through, the pre-enquette stage and not be blocked, by the efforts of the Crown Attorney, Allison Macpherson, was also a mistake. They wanted to make sure, like the Idholo case, that this man, Said Qualla, was also not prosecuted. He is also believed, to be a paid informant, of the police and also against the victim, in this case.

At some point, those in league with the police and also the government, in carrying out those attacks, against the victim, has to be prosecuted and also to be forced to give evidence, under oath, about what they know and also about their involvement, in the conspiracy. That will also never be done in any Canadian court.
Taking the matter up, with the international courts, in order to protect the human rights, of the victim, is the only recourse. The Canadian authorities, and those within the courts, such as the crown attorney's office, or h the civil courts, who are also involved and there is also immense evidence available, also, including a paper trail, over the years, that also can't be missed, has to be held accountable, for breaking the law, in this case.

Lawyer, Allison MacPherson, is just another corrupt lawyer and Crown Attorney, whose actions, until now, has been covered up. This is also no longer the case.



ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT. A To...