THIS SENIOR JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM, WITH ME TALKNG PUBLICLY, ABOUT HIS PERFORMANCE, AS A JUDGE. I FIND THAT IT IS, NECESSARY TO DO SO, IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC. DUE TO THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, IN THE COURT.
AND THAT IN MY OPINION, WAS THE REASON, HE ALSO RULED AGAINST ME, TODAY, AT MY MOTIONS HEARING, FOR URGENT RELIEF, TO ALLOW ME BACK INTO THE SHELTER, AFTER I WAS ALSO EVICTED FROM IT LAST WEEK, BUT HE DECLINED. I AM STILL HOMELESS. THE JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, ACCEPTED THE STATEMENT, IN THE AFFIDAVIT, OF THE RESPONDENT, LESLEY NAGODA, THAT I WAS STAYING, AT A SHELTER, CALLED SISTERING, IN TORNTO. THAT WAS A LIE. I WAS NEVER ACCEPTED, AT THAT PLACE, WHICH IS A DROPIN AND NOT A SHELTER, FOR TWO REASONS. THE FIRST, IS THAT THEY HAD NO BEDS AND THE SECOND REASON, WAS THAT I HAD TOO MANY BAGS, WITH ME. ABOUT FOUR BAGS, PLUS A BRIEFCASE AND A HANDBAG AND THEY ONLY ACCEPT PEOPLE, WITH EXACTLY TWO BAGS, OR LESS. SO WHEN I CALLED SHIP AND TOLD THEM MY DILEMA, THE STAFF THEN CLAIMED, THAT HE WAS TOLD, OTHERWISE.
I WANTED PROOF, SO I HELD THE PHONE NEAR TO, THE SISTERING STAFF, WHO WAS TELLING ME ALL THIS, WHILE THE SHIP'S STAFF, WAS ON THE PHONE WITH ME. HER NAME WAS AFRA, OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT AND SHE CATEGORICALLY SAID, IN THE PRESENCE OF THE SHIP WORKER, THAT THEY HAD NO BEDS, NOR DID THEY ACCEPT ANYONE, INCLUDING ME, WITH MORE THAN TWO BAGS. THEY ONLY HAD CHAIRS, FOR THE DOZENS OF PEOPLE, ALREADY STAYING THERE, TO SIT ALL NIGHT ON AND SLEEP, FOR THE NIGHT. I ENDED UP TAKING MY BAGS, WITH A TAXI TO MY STORAGE, WHICH COSTS ME, FORTY FIVE DOLLARS CASH, FOR THE TAXI AND THEN WENT TO STAY AT A MOTEL. I HAVE NEVER STAYED, AT THIS DROPIN, CALLED SISTERING, WHICH SHIP ALSO CALLED, A SHELTER. EVERYONE KNOWS, THAT IT IS A DROP IN CENTER AND THE PEOPLE WHO SLEPT THERE, ON CHAIRS, ALL NIGHT, HAS TO LEAVE IN THE MORNING. THEY CAN O THIS, MAXINUM, FOR TWO DAYS, THE STAFF AT THE DROPIN SAID. IN FACT, THE STAFF AT THE DROP IN CENTER, NAME AFRA, ALSO TOLD ME, THAT SHIP WAS ONLY TRYING TO GET RID OF ME, BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE ALSO KNOWN, THAT THERE WERE NO BEDS AT THE DROP IN AND THAT THEY ALSO DID NOT TAKE ANYONE, WITH MORE THAN TWO BAGS OF LUGGAGE.
THE JUDGE DID NOT SEEM TO CARE, REGARDING MY URGENT MOTION, AND BELIEVED, THE RESPONDENT, SHIP'S DIRECTOR'S STATEMENT, IN HER AFFIDAVIT. PLUS HE ALSO HAD HIS OWN REASONS, FOR DENYING, MY URGENT MOTION, FOR A MANDATORY ORDER, TO GET BACK INTO THE SHELTER. AND IN MY OPINION, IT WAS ALSO, BASED ON REPRISAL. BASED ON MY ARTICLE, ABOUT THE SAID JUDGE, ON MY BLOG.
WHEN HE ASKED ME FOR EVIDENCE, I FORGOT TO SHOW HIM, MY MOTEL RECEIPTS, WHICH I STILL HAVE, BY THE WAY. (AND ALSO CANNOT AFFORD, AT THIS TIME). I AM STILL IN THE SAME CRISIS, THAT I WAS IN A WEEK AGO, HOMELESS, WHEN SHIP EVICTED ME, FROM THE SHELTER, WHILE THE MATTER WAS AND STILL IS, BEFORE THE COURT. AND THE SENIOR JUDGE, L. RICCHETTI, ALSO HAS NO ISSUES WITH THAT. I STILL HAVE AN ISSUE, WITH PARA [5] OF HIS ENDORSEMENT, WHICH BASICALLY, INSTIGATED SHIP, TO REPLACE ME, WITH SOMEONE ELSE, REGARDING THE OCCUPANCY, OF THE ROOM. HAD HE NOT MENTIONED IT, IN HIS ENDORSEMENT, SHIP WOULD HAVE PROBABLY NOT DONE SO, BUT THIS JUDGE GAVE THEM THE GO AHEAD, TO FILL THE VACANCY, THAT WAS LEFT WITH THEM EVICTING ME, FROM THE SHELTER, AND WHICH DOES NOT ALSO MEAN, THAT THERE WERE NO OTHER ROOM AVAILABLE, THERE AS WELL. BUT THANKS TO THE JUDGE, RICCHETTI'S STATEMENTS, SHIP WILL NOW ALWAYS SAY, THAT THEY HAVE NO SPACE, EVEN WHEN THAT IS ALSO NOT THE CASE. SHIP'S STAFF, ALSO PREVENTED ME, FROM GETTING PRIVATE HOUSING, BECAUSE OF ITS STAFF HARASSMENT. I COULD NOT FOCUS ON THE FINANCIAL ASPECT, OF MY SITUATION, BECAUSE SHIP'S STAFF, FELT THAT I SHOULD SPEND ALL OF MY TIME, LOOKING FOR THEIR KIND OF HOUSING, WHICH ALSO DID NOT FIT, MY SITUATION, PERSONALLY.
THE SITUATION CREATED BY SHIP, ALSO CRIPPLED ME, FINANCIALLY. FOR INSTANCE, DOING BOOK READINGS, OF MY CHILDREN BOOKS, HAD TO BE PUT ON HOLD, BECAUSE OF THE DEMAND OF SHIP'S STAFF, TO FOCUS ALL OF MY TIME, ON HOUSING SEARCHES. MY OTHER LEGAL MATTERS, ALSO SUFFERED, AS A RESULT, AND I DO ALL MY LEGAL MATTERS, AS A SELF REPRESENTED, LITIGANT, CURRENTLY, WITH AT LEAST SIX OUTSTANDING CASES, THAT I AM CURRENTLY, DEALING WITH, IN ALL THREE COURTS. FROM THE DIVISIONAL COURT, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL. INCLUDING, A PANEL REVIEW, REGARDING, MY JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION, NEXT MONTH, A CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION APPLICATION, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE AND TWO NOTICES OF MOTION FOR LEAVE, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. PLUS SEVERAL CIVIL CLAIMS. SHIP IS GOING TO PAY ME DAMAGES, FOR ALL OF THESE. FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, MENTAL ANGUISH AND LOST INCOME, E.T.C.
NOW BACK TO THE JUDGE. THIS JUDGE, RICCHETTI, ALSO MENTIONED, AT THE MOTIONS HEARING, TODAY, ABOUT ME, REPORTING ON MY BLOG, REGARDING THE COURT PROCEEDING. WHAT HE REALLY MEANT, WAS ABOUT ME, REPORTING, ABOUT HIM. HE HAD NO REGARD, FOR EITHER MY HUMAN RIGHTS, OR MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, UNDER THE CHARTER. WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?. I DID NOT VIDEO OR AUDIO RECORDED THE HEARING. HE SHOULD BE GLAD, ABOUT THIS FACT. I RESPECTED THE LAW AND DID NOT DO THAT. ALTHOUGH, IT WAS ALSO NEEDED. THE LAW ACTUALLY, DO PROTECT YOU, IF YOU ARE REPORTING, THE TRUTH. WHAT I DO, IS TO EXERCISE MY RIGHT TO MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH, AND REPORTED ON MY OWN DAMN MATTERS, BEFORE THE CANADIAN COURT, AS A HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE VICTIM. MY STORY NEEDS TO BE OUT THERE, SO PEOPLE CAN KNOW, WHAT IS HAPPENING, TO SOME PEOPLE, IN THE CANADIAN COURT.
IF I HAD THE CLOUT, I WOULD ALSO PUSH FOR THE UN, TO HOLD CANADA GUILTY, FOR THIS FORM OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE. THE DESTRUCTON OF PEOPLE'S LIVES, BY THE COURTS. NOT ONLY DO I GET THE TRUTH OUT THERE, SO THAT THE PUBLIC CAN ALSO GET ACCESS TO THIS INFORMATION, BUT I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THOSE WHO ARE ENTRUSTED, WITH CERTAIN PUBLIC DUTY, SHOULD BE CARRYING OUT SUCH DUTY, THAT WILL ALSO, BENEFIT THE PUBLIC. AND ONLY THE ONES, WHO ARE DOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY, ARE SCARED, BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE.
ARY, TO REPORT TO THE PUBLIC, WHAT ACTUALLY TRANSPIRES, IN THE CANADIAN COURT. WITHOUT ACTUALLY, VIDEO, OR AN AUDIO RECORDING, THE HEARING, OF ITS PROCEEDINGS. WHICH THEY SAY, IS ALSO FORBIDDEN. BUT EXERCISING MY RIGHTS, TO FREE SPEECH AND ALSO, IF IT INVOLVES ME, DIRECTLY, REPORTING ON MY MATTERS BEFORE THE COURT, SINCE IT ALSO ALWAYS, INVOLVED, THE ABUSE OF MY RIGHTS, IN SOME WAY. THAT, I WILL NOT KEEP QUIET ABOUT.
IMAGINE, HOW MUCH MORE EASIER, MY JOB WOULD BE, IN EXPOSING, CORRUPTION AND OTHER SERIOUS CONCERNS, WITH THE CANADIAN COURTS, IF THIS GOVERNMENT, WHICH CLAIM TO BE A DEFENDER, OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ALSO ALLOW ITS COURT PROCEEDINGS, TO BE VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDED, TO ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC, HAVE CONFIDENCE, IN ITS PROCEEDINGS. THEN MY JOB WOULD BE DONE. THE JUDGES AND THE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, WOULD THINK TWICE, IN SAYING OR DOING ANYTHING, THAT IS OUTSIDE OF THE LAW. BUT WHEN NO ONE CAN SEE THEM, THEY ACT CORRUPT AND
