Monday, July 30, 2012

THE REGIONAL, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OFFICE, AT OLD CITY HALL, DID THE RIGHT THING,(FOR ONCE).

The Regional Justice of the Peace office and also the Justice of the Peace, Warren Ralth, at Old City Hall, ordered that the JP's office, take the private information, against the police.

These Justices of the Peace, all claimed that they were too busy, or some other reasons, and therefore could not take the private information, against the police.
Justice of the Peace, G. Gairy, Justice of the Peace, M. Skapinkur, as well as Justice of the Peace, M. Bedard. JP Gairy later took the information, following the order, from the Regional Justice of the Peace Office, that is also located, at the same court house, and from the Justice of the Peace, Warren Ralth, in that office, to do so. He had also previously claimed, that he was also busy, on another occasion, but this time he also complied, with the request, from the office of the senior justice of the peace and also took the private information, against the Toronto police officers.


After making several attempts, to lay my own private charges, against the Toronto police, 14 division, for their role, in the arrest of the man, who was also charged by them, with a misdemeanor charge, for threatening an animal, I was finally able to lay the private information, after being turned away, by the Justices of the Peace, at the old city hall court house. Today, they again refused, to lay the charges, against the police and also against the man, Hugues Idholo, who also now faces, additional charges, of assault with a weapon and also of uttering death threats, regarding the July 9th incident. And with all of them, claiming that they were too busy, and that I should also come back another day, or go to another court, nearby, to lay the charges. I was even told by the clerk, in the JP's office, that the regional Justice of the Peace, was also away and could not see me, when I also made that request. I went to that office at the court house anyway, and was later able to lay the private information, against the police officers.

Some of the misconducts, of JP Marcel Bedard, at the Old City Hall court house.
Justice of the Peace, Marcel Bedard, who has tried to intimidate and also threatened me, with the same charges, that I was also trying to have laid, against the police officers, by claiming, that, "do you know that you could be charged, with obstructing justice yourself?. He also tried to get me to give further evidence, other than what was in my written statement and when I refused, by claiming that it was also improper, for him to insist, that I also give additional information, about the case at that time, including being forced, or coerced to do so, by him, and hence his comments.

The JP, Marcel Bedard, also insisted at that time, to make a decision, on the case. That is, whether to accept the information, against the police officers, based also on its merit, by also claiming, after reading the information, that, there was also insufficient evidence, or information, to lay the private charges against the police. And insisting, also, that I should go into details, about all of the charges, against the police, beginning with the obstructing justice charges and the others. He also accused me of being "uncooperative" and therefore would not take the private information, after I also refused to go into more detail, about the case, other than what was in my written statement. The Justice of the Peace, Marcel Bedard, was also insisting, that I explain to him in detail, about the charges and also the incidences, that has led up to the charges, that I wanted to have laid against the police. Anyone can see that he was going in the wrong direction here.

Legally, a justice of the peace, cannot refuse to take the private information, once you've identified yourself, satisfactorily. Excuses about being busy, is also not a legitimate reason, to refuse a complaint. Since the private information was also about the police, the JPs were doing all that they could, to stop the charges from being laid, against the police officers, even to the point of threatening me, with the charge of obstructing justice, myself, should I also persist, in laying the charges against the police. Thankfully, his ridiculous and also incompetent decision, was later overrided and I was also able to lay the information.

The JP Marcel Bedard, also ordered my friend and witness to this inappropriate conduct, on his part, Nadir Siguencia, out of the room and when I asked the JP, Bedard, if I could also record the proceeding, he also said no. My friend also complied and left the room and immediately after that, the JP, Marcel Beard, also continued with his "interrogation", only to have me flatly refused, to give any other information, since it was also not a full hearing or a trial. Later this was override by another JP, in the senior Justice of the Peace office , who ordered that he, or another JP, in that office, take the information. Next, there is the pre-enquette hearing, which is also scheduled for August 3rd and I am also anticipating, that I will also run into the same kind of obstacle, in trying to have those police officers charged and also prosecuted.

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Quote Of The Day

"I am from Germany and Canada, tainted, beyond belief".
Professor Ewe Rhindhart

THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, CORRUPTION, IN MY CASE.

UPDATE TO THE ACTIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA'S DECISION IN MY CASE.

The Supreme Court of Canada, has still continued to ignore, the urgent motion, that I have filed, with that court, concerning my appeal, that is also before the Supreme Court of Canada.

On June 20th, the registrar office, also claimed, that I would hear from the court, "shortly", regarding that motion, which was also filed on May 30, 2012, with the S.C.C. and I am still waiting. As a self represented litigant, before that court, I have also endured the further abuse of my human rights, because of the corruption, that is involved, regarding my case.

In July, the Supreme Court of Canada, was also contacted, about that same motion and the applicant was also told, by the registrar's office, of the S.C.C. that they could not find any copy of that motion. They had also claimed previously, that they had received it, on June 1st, but now they have also changed their story.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

THREE JPS AT OLD CITY HALL REFUSED TO TAKE THE INFORMATION CHARGES, AGAINST TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS.

The 14 Division Toronto Police
Officers charged in the case involving their arrest of man.

Man who made death threats, was released by the police, soon afer his arrest, back on to the property, where the victims live.

-The 14 Division Toronto Police also did the following:
Releasing the man, after his death threats to the victim, on a form 10 and without any conditions, on his part, as a part of his release, back unto the same property.

-Changing the order of his name, making his first name the last name.

The Toronto police also did not lay the proper charges, of assault with a weapon and uttering death threats, against the man, who they also claimed, was arrested and charged by the police. The charge laid by the police, against him, is for 'threatening an animal', not threatening to kill an animal, as it should be. Since the threats were also told to the police directly.

It is unheard of for the police, to release someone, who has threatened death and who has also made the statement to them, back into the residence, where the victim lives. It is also unthinkable, to the public, that the same police, would also ignore the statements, made to them, by the person committing the crime, by also refusing, to lay the appropriate charges, after being a witness, to this person's actions directly. The 14 division Toronto police did all of this and more. They also changed the order of the accused name from Hugues Ibholo Yala to the last name being Hugues. And several days, or a week later, his information could also not be found in their computer data base, without an intent search made.

THESE JPS ARE THE SUBJECT OF A JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR REFUSING TO TAKE THE PRIVATE INFORMATION, BY A CITIZEN, AGAINST SOME TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS, RECENTLY AND ALSO FOR ACTING CORRUPTLY. THE JPS ARE J.H. JACKSON, D. KEILTY AND S. JOHN, THE WORST OF THE THREE. IN FACT THE COMPLAINT FOR CORRUPTION IS AGAINST HIM MOSTLY. THE TWO OTHER JPS SIMPLY DID NOT WANT TO BE INVOLVED IN THE LAYING OF CHARGES AGAINST THOSE POLICE OFFICERS, BUT JP S. JOHN, HAD TO ALSO TRY TO PERSONALLY INTERFERE IN THE LAYING OF THOSE CHARGES THAT GOES EVEN BEYOND THE ACTIONS OF THE OTHER JPS AT OLD CITY HALL IN TORONTO, RECENTLY AND BY ALSO COMMENTING THAT "THESE CHARGES ARE AGAINST POLICE OFFICERS, SO DON'T TELL ME HOW TO DO MY JOB". NO ONE WAS DOING THAT. THE JP INSTEAD OF ACCEPTING THE INFORMATION AS HE WAS SUPPOSE TO DO, WAS MORE INTERESTED IN GATHERING MORE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE AND ASKING QUESTIONS THAT WERE ALSO INAPPROPRIATE AT THAT HEARING. HE READ THE INFORMATION IN DETAIL AND WAS ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CHARGES AND WANTED MORE "EVIDENCE" FROM THE WITNESS, BEFORE HE GO AHEAD AND ACCEPT THE CHARGES, WHICH HE IS ALSO NOT ALLOWED TO DO. JP J.H JACKSON ACTED CORRUPTLY BY ATTEMPTING TO START THE PROCESS OF TAKING THE PRIVATE INFORMATION AGAINST THE POLICE AND THEN LATER INTERUPTED THE PROCESS BY STATING THAT HE HAD A LOT OF OTHER PAPER WORK AND WAS TOO BUSY AND THAT THE VICTIM SHOULD COME BACK ANOTHER DAY TO LAY THE CHARGES. THIS AFTER HE HAD ALSO BEGUN RECORDING AND THEN TOLD THE VICTIM THAT HE COULD NOT CONTINUE BECAUSE OF HIS WORK LOAD. WHY NOT JUST SAY THAT IN THE BEGINING?
LATER ON A WOMAN IN THE REGIONAL JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OFFICE WHICH IS ALSO LOCATED AT THE SAME COURT ALSO CLAIMED THAT IT WOULD BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR HER AND THE OTHER JUSTICES OF THE PEACE TO CHARGE THOSE POLICE OFFICERS. PRESUMABLY BECAUSE THEY ALSO DEAL WITH THEM EVERYDAY, INVOLVING OTHER CASES. SHE EVEN WENT AS FAR AS TO SAY THAT THE PRE ENQUETTE HEARING OF THOSE 14 DIVISON POLICE OFFICERS WOULD ALSO HAVE TO BE HEARD AT ANOTHER COURT, BECAUSE OF THIS CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND ALSO THAT EACH JP HAS THE RIGHT TO ACT ACT DIFFERENTLY IN EACH CASE. SHE SOMEHOW DID NOT MENTIONED THAT THE JPS ALSO HAD THE LEGAL OBLIGATION AFTER THEY HAVE RECEIVED ALL OF THE INFORMATION TO ALSO LAY THE CHARGES. IN FACT UNDER THE LAW, THEY CANNOT REFUSED TO DO SO. ONCE THE PERSON CAN IDENTIFY THEMSELVES PROPERLY THEN THEIR IS ALSO NO REASON FOR THE JP SUCH AS S. JOHN TO REFUSE THE LAYING OF THOSE PRIVATE INFORMATION AGAINST THE POLICE OFFICERS AND AS HE HAD ALSO DONE IN THIS CASE.
JP D. KEILY SIMPLY REFUSED TO TAKE THE INFORMATION CLAIMING THAT HE WAS BUSY ALSO. YET NEITHER HE NOR JP J.H JACKSON WAS TOO BUSY TO SEE THE NEXT PERSON IN LINE AFTER ME AND TO SIGN HIS AFFIDAVIT.

ARE THESE TORONTO JPS SAYING THAT THOSE POLICE OFFICERS ARE ABOVE COMMITITING OFFENCES AND THAT THEY SHOULD ALSO GIVE THEM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT. THE MATTER HAS NOT EVEN REACHED A HEARING YET AND THERE IS SUCH EVIDENCE OF BIAS AND CORRUPTION REGARDING THOSE POLICE OFFICERS BREAKING THE LAW AND ALSO ACTING OUTSIDE OF THEIR DUTIES, REGARDING THIS CASE. THE DIFFICULTY IN LAYING THE CHARGES AGAINST THOSE TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS, HAS ALREADY SHOWN THAT IT WILL ALSO BE A FIGHT TO THE VERY END TO HAVE THEM MADE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.

THE CONSPIRACY TO ACT CORRUPTLY AND TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE RECENT CASE INVOLVING SOME TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS FROM 14 DIVSION WHO HAD REFUSED TO LAY THE PROPER CHARGES AGAINST A MAN, HUGUES IDHOLO YALA, AFTER HE HAD TOLD THEM, DIRECTLY, THAT HE INTENDED TO KILL AN ANIMAL. THE MAN HAD ALSO ADVANCED WITH A KNIFE TOWARDS THE VICTIM WITH THE INTENTION OF KILLING HER ANIMAL, OR HER DIRECTLY.

THE 14 DIVISION POLICE DID NOT LAY THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGES OF UTTERING DEATH THREATS AND ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON, IN THAT CASE, BUT INSTEAD CHARGED THE MAN WITH THE LESSER CHARGE OF ONLY "THREATENING AN ANIMAL". NOT THREATENING TO KILL AN ANIMAL, OR UTTERING DEATH THREATS TO KILL AN ANIMAL. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WHICH WILL ALSO BE REVEALED FULLY AT A HEARING, WILL ALSO SHOW THAT THE POLICE, IN THAT CASE, MAY ALSO HAVE OTHER REASONS, NOT TO CHARGE THE MAN, WITH THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGES. THE POLICE EVEN WENT SO FAR AS TO CHANGE THE ORDER OF HIS NAME. HE IS REFERED TO IN THEIR REPORT AS HUGUES, BEING HIS LAST NAME AND NOT HIS FIRST NAME AND THIS IS ALSO AGAINST OTHER DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE THAT HIS NAME AS IT IS STATED ABOVE, IN THIS ARTICLE, IS HUGUES IDHOLO YALA. HE IS ALSO KNOW TO DROP THE LAST NAME YALA AND JUST GO BY THE NAME OF HUGUES IDHOLO. ACCORDING TO ONE POLICE OFFICER AT THE SCENE, ITS THE NAME THAT THE MAN GIVE TO THEM THAT THEY WILL ALSO USE AND NOT WHAT HE IS KNOWN TO USE, IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES.
THERE IS ALSO QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS IMMIGRATION STATUS IN CANADA. THE CONCERN IS THAT THE MAN, WHO I ALSO BELIEVED WAS AND STILL IS, WORKING AS AN AGENT PROVOCATEUR FOR THE 14 DIVISION POLICE, HAS ALSO BEEN PROTECTED BY THEM, DURING THIS ARREST, AND THE POLICE BY IGNORING THE DEATH THREATS THAT HE HAD ALSO MADE TO THEM DIRECTLY, HAS ALSO ACTED TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE MATTER.
THE VITIM (ME, SEE ALSO MY VIDEO, BELOW THIS ARTICLE) WAS TOLD THAT THE POLICE OFFICERS FROM 14 DIVSION HAD DISCUSSED AT THE STATION AFTER THE MAN'S ARREST, TO RELEASE HIM ON A FORM 10 AND ALSO BACK INTO THE SAME BUILDING THAT THE VICTIM AND HER ANIMAL LIVED THAT HE HAD ALSO MADE THE DEATH THREATS AGAINST.

THE VICTIM IN THIS CASE, WHO IS ALSO ME, THEN LATER TRIED TO CHARGE THOSE POLICE OFFICERS WITH OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE REGARDING THEIR DECISION TO IGNORE THE INFORMATION THAT WAS TOLD TO THEM DIRECTLY AND ALSO FROM THE ACCUSED, TO KILL THE ANIMAL. THE VICTIM AND THE OWNER OF THE ANIMAL, IS ALSO A WITNESS AGAINST THE POLICE, IN THIS CASE, HAVING HEARD THE DEATH THREATS BEING TOLD TO THE POLICE OFFICERS WHO ATTENDED THE CALL, BY THE MAN DIRECTLY. WHO ALSO STATED THAT HE "DIDN'T CARE, I'M GOING TO KILL HER CAT". THE POLICE OFFICERS AND ALSO THEIR SUPERIORS AT THE 14 DIVISION POLICE STATION, LATER IGNORED THAT INFORMATION IN THEIR REPORT AND DID NOT CHARGE THE MAN WITH THE MORE APPROPRIATE AND ALSO MORE SERIOUS CHARGE OF UTTERING DEATH THREATS, TO THE VICTIM IN THIS CASE.

"COME BACK ANOTHER DAY AND LAY THE CHARGES IF THOSE OTHER JPS REFUSED", THE VICTIM IS TOLD. AND THAT IS ALSO WHAT WILLBE DONE, IN THIS CASE.

Monday, July 9, 2012

FILING CORRUPTION CHARGES, WITH THE I.C.C. AGAINST CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.
Fatou Bensounda, Chief Prosecutor, with the International Criminal Court.

The chief prosecutor with the I.C.C. is also someone to watch. She is known to have overlooked, in the past, criminal actions, by Canada.

THE MESSAGE HAS TO BE SENT LOUD AND CLEAR, THAT THEY CANNOT GET AWAY WITH THEIR CRIMES AGAINST ME AND AGAINST THE PUBLIC AS WELL.

Canada is a violator of the Rome Stature of the I.C.C. Which also state simply enough, that the particular State should refrain from "acts which defeat the object and purpose" of the Rome Stature. Preamble of the Rome Stature: (in part)
(a)Conscious that all peoples are united by common bonds, their cultures pieced together in a shared heritage, and concerned that this delicate mosaic may be shattered at any time. (b)Determined to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus to contribute to the prevention of such crimes. (c) Reaffirming the Purposes and Principles of the Charter of the United Nations...

Not only is Canada one of the States that has signed on to the Rome Statue, but it also holds the dubious distinction, as also being the first country, to do so. Canada has not only signed up to the the Rome Statue, but it has also ratified it, on July 9, 2000 and has also enacted it into its legislation, when it also adopted the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act , or CAHWCA, on June 4, 2000. In fact Canada is even more guilty of failing through on its promise, to abide by that treaty, because it has also, in fact, incorporated it, into many of its own laws, which it has chosen to ignore, when it also suits its purpose to do so.

If charges cannot be laid against those persons in Canada, then those charges will be laid, with the International Criminal Court. The I.C.C may also be full of corruption, like its sister agency, the United Nations, but that will also not stop me, from commencing with those charges, in that court and against the Canadian government, for its violation of the Rome Statue, in my case and specifically, for carrying out crimes against humanity and other objectionable acts, regarding me, including by the State, directly and also by Canadian government official and other persons, who are also involved in my matter.

By now they are also probably celebrating their victory against me, in their conspiracy to destroy me. It has included the corruption of the Canadian courts against me, including the Supreme Court of Canada, which has also acted complicit, or negligible in the matter. Including also taking no actions to protect my rights, under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and other offences, against the administration of justice, in my case. It has also included its participation in the actions of both the court and also government officials, in acting corruptly, where my rights are concerned, including also, carrying on with this action, from the lower courts, right up to the Supreme Court of Canada, which has also included the maladministration of justice, in both the criminal court and the civil court. For instance, not being able to lay any charges, against those persons, who are involved regarding their actions against me. Where my efforts to do so, has also been blocked, by the Canadian courts, both the criminal court and also the civil court.

Even actions that seemed to be irrelevant to the issue, that is, regarding that State's crimes against humanity, regarding me, is also a part of its overall conspiracy, to deprive me of certain basic human rights. Such as forcing me out of my home and according to their latest actions, removing my belongings and preparing to get rid of them. This of course was done with the permission of the Canadian courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada, where I am still waiting for its decision, by way of my motion that was also filed, with that court, more than a month ago, to re-enter my home, while my application for leave and also my appeal, is still pending before that court. The basic human right, to the security of person, for instance, was also denied to me, and not to mention those other so called rights, that are also "guaranteed" under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, such as the right to "Equal Treatment and Benefit of Law", which was also denied to me, because of the corruption of the Canadian courts against me and also the personal corruption, of the government officials and their accomplices involved, regarding obstructing justice in my case.

According to lawyer Paula Boutis, who will also be charged, for her role in the matter, with corruption and obstructing justice charge and other charges, "there is nothing else that can be done, by me, regarding the matter". But then against, she does not know me, or my determination to get justice, in this matter.

I would imagine that they also now believed that they are beyond any culpability regarding this matter. But they are also wrong. The Canadian government, will also pay me millions of dollars in damages, for injuries that I have also incurred as a direct result of its actions against me and those persons who are also directly involved, regarding the criminal element of this investigation, will also be charged, for their actions against me. They will also try to claim that they cannot be charged, twice, for the same offences, but that is also done all of the time, in the Canadian courts, against some people and since I was not able to lay those charges in any Canadian courts, I will also be prosecuting them, in the International Criminal Court. And the list of persons who will also be charged, is also quite long.

The list of individuals who will face criminal charges with the I.C.C. regarding their actions, involving corruption and other criminal charges against me, included Roger Bilodeau, of the Supreme Court of Canada and the S.C.C judge, Morris Fish, Justice of the Peace, Peter Gettlich, crown attorney Joshua Tuppper and other crown attorneys, at the Provincial Court, located at 1000 Finch Court House, in Toronto, Canada, who has interfered personally, with my cases before that court, as well as the sheriffs of the Toronto Enforcement office and lawyer Paul Boutis, Lisa Lipowitz and Sandra Thompson and others will also be charges, before the I.C.C. The primary charges against them being corruption, conspiracy and obstructing justice, in my case. Under the crimes against humanity charge, against this State, i.e Canada also, the actions of its police agencies, against me, is also the main focus of that charge. Which has also included the act of torture against me. Both physical and psychological torture, that was carried out by this country against me. The question to be asked, is, did the actions of that State, or Canada, has violated any of my rights, under the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and did it also carry out any crimes against me, in doing so. The answer of course is absolutely yes. It did and also continues to do so, in my case.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

ROGER BILODEAU, REGISTRAR , OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.


THE PERSONAL CORRUPTION, OF ROGER BILODEAU, REGARDING MY CASE, BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.


The Revelation, of the Personal Corruption, of the Registrar and Also the Judges, of the Supreme Court of Canada, is Also Quite Schocking.


Someone should explain to me, why the Registrar, of Canada's so called "highest" court, should also continue, to act corruptly, regarding my case, before that court, curently?

Roger Bilodeau, like the other judges of that court, has also acted corruptly, involving my case. He has also had my urgent motion, before him, for more than a month now and has also not acted upon it. My recent inquiry, to the Supreme Court of Canada, on June 27, 2012, where I was also told, by a registry officer, of that court, name "Eric", that my motion, is still before the registrar, since May 30, 2012. Actually, in the Supreme Court of Canada, data base, they have listed the date, as June 1st, that they have received, the hard copy of that motion. This is also a blatant lie, since I also have, indisputable proof, that the S.C.C. had also reveived, that motion, on May 30th and not June 1s. Last week, I was also told by the same person, I believed, that "I would get a response shortly", from that court and I am still waiting.

Since the motion, is also to allow me to get back into my home, after the illegal writ of possession, that was crried out by the sheriff, I also saw the correlation, between that incident and also why the S.C.C. also changed the date, that it had received the hard copy, of that motion, from May 30, 2012, to June 1, 2012. It is part of the overall conspiracy, that also involved, the Supreme Court of Canada, as well as the other previous courts, to destabilized my situation, and to also forced me from my home. This is why the court, has also ignored the motion and has also not acted, to protect my rights, in this case. I am still waiting, for it to decide, on my case, involving my appeal, before the S.C.C. regarding the court of appeal, which had claimed a lack of jurisdiction, to hear my case.

Being able to show, this kind of personal corruption, by those persons in the highest court in Canada, has also allowed the public, to get a first hand view, of the kind of systematic corruption, that also exist with the Canadian judicial system.

CANADA AND THE UNITED NATIONS.













"Corruption by its very nature is a secret crime".

THE UNITED NATIONS AND OTHER HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE, AS CANADA CONTINUES TO COMMIT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN INDIVIDUAL CASES, LIKE MINE.
What Is Also Involved: The Big Corporations, like Deloitte & Touche And Mintz & Partners and The Corruption, By the Canadian Government, Involving Those Corporations. Their Role In Working With The Canadian Government, To Carry Out Certain Crimes, Against Me, Due To Their Proximity To Me And The Jewish Conspiracy and Plot To Destroy Me.

The Corruption That Exist, Within The United Nations And The lie, That Is Also Being Perpetrated, Upon The World, Regarding The United Nations And Canada.
Canada Now Has The Permission, Of The United Nations, To Carry Out Crimes Against Humanity, And Other Human Rights Abuse, In Individual Cases, Like Mine.
The United Nations Do Not Protect Human Rights.It is not an oversight, that the United Nations, Has Never Taken Any Actions, Against Canada, To Protect My Human Rights, Or To Stop Its Abuse of My Human Rights. Its claim to protect human rights, in all cases, is one big lie. Many factors also comes into play, regarding the corruption, of the United Nations, including, the country that is also the subject, of its investigation and most importantly, the personal corruption, of UN staff. Many of whom can also be influenced, directly, or their silence also "bought", by the perpetrator, for whatever reasons.

I cannot change the world, but I will also stand up for my rights, despite the corruption, that also exist, with that country, in my case and also with human rights organizations, to also allow it to continue, with its actions, against certain persons, or targets of that government.

More News: A World Full of Corruption And The Danger In Exposing The Truth. "The Truth is Always Unpopular and Those Who Expose It Are Always Hated For It".

"If law fails, CIA will assassinate Assange"

ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT. A To...