Wednesday, August 26, 2009


There is in my opinion nothing honorable about this Justice of the Peace.
For those who are unfamiliar with the legal system in Canada, the information presented here should be an eye opener. Let me state this very clearly. Corruption is the order of the day as far as how Judges and Justice of the Peace, conduct the court. Few of them are morally upstanding. Most are corrupted and is part of the overall system that exist, that has also tramples upon the rights of people in this country. The case against Ontario Justice of the Peace Vasilios Bill Fatsis, is one of those examples regarding how Justices of the Peace, can act outside of their administrative duties, to pervert the law. The most common accusations against them is personal bias, influenced by other factors such as racism, or as in this case a conspiracy, I believed, not to exercise the law in my case. The conspiracy involved, I believed, also the police and the court and the fact that they have worked together to prevent me from exercising my rights as a member of the public. What I want to exposed here is what I believed to be the personal bias and corruption of that Justice of the Peace, Bill Fatsis, and how such actions on his part, has also interfered with the administration of justice in my case and as a member of the public. He has not only shown a disregard for those rights that I have, as a member of the public, but he has also not considered the implications of his actions, upon the public(which is what corruption is, when it is commited by government or by other public officials, such as in this case). What I had been trying to do, was to exercise my right to lay a private complaint (charge), against those persons who has been harassing me, repeatedly, for years in my home. As members of my Coop, I had been targeted by them specifically, for years and as I have mentioned here on my blog, that this targeting was also the result, I believed, of the police and those persons, acting together. I have been unable to have them charged for their attacks against me, or to exercise my rights, as a member of the public, thanks to the corruption that is also involved, which has not only included the conspiracy between those persons and others, such as the police directly, but also the court, as far as the influence of the police is concerned. It would appear also, that I am the one that they would like to charge instead, but because I have been exposing their actions publicly, they are acting in other ways, to try and interfere with my rights. Being the target of the police for many years, I also know how they operates. Since I also believed that they are behind the harassment that I have also been experiencing by those persons it is also no stretch of the immagination to believed that they are also involved in preventing me from laying any charges against them as well. They I also believed has been carrying out those actions on behalf of the police and others and with also with their open knowledge and consent. When for instance I called the police about them they did not even make a pretence of investigating. It was also very evident that they were not going to do anything on my behalf. But their influence also goes further I believed to influence also the court in the conspiracy involved. This is not an exaggeration. Once many years ago when I had gone to the same court to charge my now ex spouse the Justice of the Peace at that Court 1000 Finch Avenue West in Toronto in my presence called the police division in my area which is the Toronto's 13 Division Police (that is also implicated in so many other illegal actions in regards to me) and after hanging up the telephone he told me that I could not lay the charge. (It was a domestic case). So I'm talking from personal experience with that police division (13 Division)and that court. Other evidence has also included the appeals that has been made by the public in order to exercise their rights against the decisions of the Judges or the Justices of the Peace at that court. In mandamus decisions that has been made some members of the public has been able to later exercise their rights to lay a private complaint. But this is also an uncommon practice in Canadian courts as well. The public is usually told by the court staff when a Justice of the Peace has not respected their rights that they have no other recourse available to them. Formal complaints against those Justice of the Peace are also a waste of time because of the corruption that is also involved in the complaint process against them. The best recourse that the public has is to expose their actions publicly in the court of public opinion when they refused to act the way that they are supposed to and disregarded the administration of justice in their decisions. Evidence abounds in the Canadian Courts of Appeals in regards to their actions and especially in regards to their personal influence in cases before them. Sometimes the public gets a reprieve while most of the time they do not in regards to those Justice of the Peace who acts corruptly by disregarding the law in their decisions involving those cases. Other factors such as race also comes into play in their decisions such as when or if they decides to lay a charge and against whom. Personal bias on the part Judge or the Justice of the Peace is also nothing new. It has been going on for a long time and has adversely affected the lives of those members of the public who has been unfortunate enough to experienced it. Those Judges and Justices of the Peace are now being exposed by members of the public because they also finds that those dispensing the law has no regards for it themselves since they are so easily influence by other factors that also has to do with denying the rights of those members of the public. It is almost a waste of time to make a formal complaint against those corrupted Justice or the Peace or Judges in those cases. The public has found out that this does not necessarily stop those actions from them as the problem is so widespread. Their actions not only interferes with the fundamental rights of the person before them but also the law as well. I was also not entirely surprised at the decision of Justice of the Peace Bill Fatsis because as mentioned before he was in my opinion personally influenced by other factors other than the law when he made his decision at least in my case. Not the least of which is the conspiracy that exist which I also believed was the true motivation behind his decision in that case. To prevent a member of the public from exercising their rights because of scrupulous actions on the part of a presiding administrator of the court should also be contested by every member of the public. Justice of the Peace like Vasilios (Bill) Fatis and others need to know that the public is also aware of their actions when they dispense the law and when their actions also adversely affected the lives of the public. We often calls this an error of judgement on their part but that is only a nice way of saying that they are corrupted and that they have f--k you up deliberately. We will exposed them and their actions when this happens and take all steps to exercise our rights as members of the public. The public should then decides if they want such persons continuing to represent either the law or their interest for that matter. Corruption by the Canadian Courts is common knowledge in this country and the personal influence of those dispensing the law is also a problem that has often been ignored as well and when this is also influenced by other factors the result is always the miscarriage of justice that the public has to put up with. Like I said before formal complaints don't always work because the entire judicial system is corrupted. What matters is that those who are appointed to dispense justice do so fairly and in a manner that will protect the rights of members of the public. When they don't they will be forced to do so even if we have to make their actions public so that they cannot hide behind it any longer and continue to make a mockery of justice. What I want to exposed here is that the Canadian justice system is seriously flawed. When you have a system for instance that also allows the court to conduct a mock trial where evidence is also brought forth at those mock trials called a preenquete hearing most of which is conducted in closed door hearings with the participants being the only witnesses and no other members of the public. That is only the person laying the private complaint(or charge) and the justice of the peace as well as the crown attorney as well as the court administrative staff a lot can and do go wrong at those hearings. It is far different from a trial where in most cases there are other members of the public presented and can also observed the proceedings. At preenquete hearings the door to the court room is locked and no other persons are allowed in the court room except those directly involved in the proceedings. At no time at those hearings also are the accused present. It is a one sided proceeding that should have no basis in the law and also seemed to violate the human rights of the informant in that case having been forced to present evidence and to give testimony at those hearings and then after all of that the person wishing to exercise their rights regarding the laying of the charges cannot have the accused brought to justice. It is a seriously flawed system where the Justice of the Peace gets to act in ways that he may not normally be allowed to do had there been a real trial with other participants including other members of the public watching. Preequete hearings in Canadian courts are a misrepresentation of justice. Period. Justices of the Peace who do not act appropriately at those hearings because they for one believes that their actions will never be exposed because usually when they make a decision that is often the end of the case unless the public goes further and tries to appeal his decision which has also been known to get thrown out of court by another corrupt Judge or Justice of the Peace which also perpetuates the cycle of the denial of justice for those persons. It has been revealed here on my blog and by others that when Canadian Judges or Justice of the Peace wants to act corruptly they would also conduct closed door hearings and exclude the public from participating. They also forbids the recording of these hearings by any recording devices such as cameras and audio tapes. Rarely does the public's complaints about those infringes upon their rights are heard. In some rare instances the member of the public who was denied justice regarding their case by a corrupt Justice of the Peace or Judge will in some cases be allowed to have their matter heard a second time by way of a mandamus decision regarding their case. But like I said this is also not usually the case because efforts will be made to discourage the public from doing so and especially when they told by the presiding Justice of the Peace as in my case or even by the court administrative staff that that is the end of the road for in regards to that matter. The court has a responsibility to informed the public correctly about their rights and not to pervert justice further by deliberately lying to them about their rights. I encouraged the public to exposed those actions by the courts which conducts those hearings in such manner and revealed the names of the Judges or Justice of the Peace like Justice of the Peace Bill Fatsis who does so. Often it is because they wish to hide their actions from the public. Those actions by them that are in violation of the rights of members of the public and also has no basis in law. Preenquete hearings is a concept that is implemented by the Canadian Courts that fundamentally interferes with the rights of the public. Closed door hearings in general should also make the public suspicious regarding those conducting such hearings. It is a corrupt system and one that is so common in Canadian courts that no one questions it anymore. But one which also interferes with the rights of the public for many different reasons. I also want to mention the name of the crown attorney in that case Jennifer Rodopoulos who was in my opinion also part of the conspiracy to deprived me of my rights. This is how thy advance in their career in the legal system. By collaborating with others in perverting justice or in denying the rights of others in this society. They will disregard the evidence of the case and replace it with their own personal bias. I could mentioned here other statistics in regards to the discrimination that is faced by some people within the Canadian judicial system but it is a waste of time. As a member of a marginalized group I have gotten used to this kind of justice and as a Black woman I know that I am very much viewed as a threat to the current system as far as my views or in how I go about exposing their actions to the public. The reasons that I tried to exercise my rights to lay those charges has included being targeted by those persons that has also included being stalked by one or more of them and targeted and harassed by them on a daily basis for years now. They have even included coming to my door and banging on it or trying to open it with their keys as well as banging on my walls and other actions on their part. I mentioned these things here because the public can judge for themselves if those actions wouldn't cause someone to fear for their safety as I have done by trying to get those persons charged but because of the conspiracy involving regarding the police and the courts I have not so far been able to do. The bitch who acted as the crown attorney Jennifer Rodopoulos even suggested that I moved instead of trying to exercise my rights as a member of the public. The Justice of the Peace Bill Fatsis was worst and he demonstrated what so many others has already suspected. How the influence of others can affect their decisions. And most importantly how in many cases their decisions has no basis in the law or in protecting the rights of a member of the public. He was unconcerned about both my safety as well as how he had dispensed the law hoping that I would accept his decision openly violate my rights further and this was also clear to see by his actions of overlooking the evidence in that case. As a social activist and someone who has exposed this kind of corruption about them (court and the police) I therefore surmised that this was also a factor in their decisions in regards to me as well. This is one of those cases involving what I clearly believed is a conspiracy to pervert justice in this case. Not only by the actions of the Justice of the Peace Vasilios (Bill) Fatsis but also others involved to prevent me from exercising my rights or to further their own cause against me which is the same thing. "Canada Court Watch" website has a listing of Judges and Justices of the Peace from across Canada that the public has complaint about. Check that site out.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009


Like so many Ontario Justice of the Peace who are corrupted this one Justice of the Peace Deena F. Baltman sits on the Brampton Superior Court of Justice and instead of dispensing justice she instead carries out her own version of it. It is extremely unfortunate and also to the public disadvantage for this woman to continue to decide on those family cases before her. It is most unfortunate for the children in those cases because she does not make her decisions in regards to the best interest of the child but other factors. For example she is most definitely influenced by the actions of others including the court staff. One of those court staff Rhonda Marshall recently sent Justice of the Peace Baltman an internal memo that was unfortunately for her also read out in court that also reflected negatively on those who had their case before her. The memo was intended to influence her decision in regards to that particular case. It is not uncommon for the Judge or the Justice of the Peace in Ontario courts to obstruct justice in cases before them by their joint collaboration with court staff in those cases. There are numerous complaints in regards to that. (See also "Court Watch" website on that issue). For instance what the public has also observed in those cases in that the particular Justice of the Peace Deena F.Baltman would leave those cases that she intends to influence personally to the last when the court room is empty or cleared of most of the participants and then acts or carries out decisions that are not in the public best interest. As I and others like Court Watch and other members of the public has observed this is also a very common practice in all of the courts in Ontario. Brampton Court in Ontario also has those court staff who I and others have believed do not serve the interest of the public. It has included such persons as Joan Zammit who is a supervisor at that court and is very disregarding in how she deals with the public at that court. The biggest concern of course are those regarding Justice of the Peace such as J.P Deena F. Baltman or others such as Justice David L. Corbett who disregards the administration of justice in their decisions and has no regard for either the public or the law itself. She also has a very big ego which is also noticeable to the public and does this too seemed to be a factor in regards to how she handles cases before her. Among her other past roles are those as adjudicator and mediator for several tribunals and one can only wonder how she has handled those other public offices as well. With the same disregard for the law as she has shown as a Justice of the Peace. (I have deliberately refrained from mentioning the names of some of those tribunals that she has also chaired because it would appear to make this report bias. (Because one or more of them has been regularly mentioned here on my blog and although this did not influence me in my reporting of the facts concerning her new role as a Justice of the Peace and how she has perverted the administration of justice in that new role as well).

Monday, August 24, 2009


A Press Release on Canada's Ongoing Violations of Human Rights (Reprinted Here)
The International Coalition against Torture (InCAT) will present on Tuesday May 3rd in Geneva a submission to the United Nations Committee against Torture that Canada is violating the Convention against Torture for denying to torture victims in Canada the ability to sue in Canadian courts the states that have tortured them. The submission will be made by David Matas and Houshang Bouzari. The Convention against Torture requires Canada to "ensure in its legal system that the victim of an act of torture obtains redress and has an enforceable right to fair and adequate compensation".

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Different Kinds Of Human Rights Abuse In Canada

Torture of political activists, disregard for respecting human rights, deplorable treatments of the poor and the mentally ill who are also arbitrarily taken off the streets and put in jail just to fill up the jails where many are often raped and given drugs against their will and for crimes that do not warrant such treatment. Systematic racism and oppression against marginalized groups in Canada and the denial of their rights. The corruption of Canadian government officials that is also routine and also regarded as a normal practice. Institutionalization of racism that is also pervasive in all areas of society and the targeting of those groups specifically by the government which has also led to the further denial of their rights. Arbitrary arrests and detention of political activists and the destruction of the lives of targeted persons by the government such as those who advocate on behalf of social justice in this country. The use of technologically advance weapons by the Canadian authorities against dissidents and against other specific targets and subjecting them to the violation of their human rights in other ways including the denial of their rights under the law. Most notably victims of torture and abuse by the police that are also carried out systematically by them against specific targets or groups. A political system that is racist and denies the rights of select groups of people as well as to oppress them.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

The United Nations Convention Against Torture And The Canadian Government Violations of It

Consider These Facts:
-That the Canadian Government targets individuals and also subjects them to torture that are carried out by Canadian authorities
-Widespread corruption and abuse by Canadian government elected and public
-Systematic racism practiced.
-Denial of the individual rights and freedom which also includes arbitrary arrests
and detentions (often without warrants by the police)
- Suppression of freedom of speech
- The use of illegal methods used against intended targets such as activists
journalists and advocates of social justice in Canada
- Deliberate destruction of their lives or livelihood by the efforts of the
The use of advance technology at their disposal against such targets that causes
them permanent injuries as well as physical and psychological tactics also used to cause them injury
- Disregard for respecting the human rights of persons or groups in its own country
- Creating a propaganda about it true role in human rights violations as part of
its intentions to deceive the international human rights community while carrying
out its torture and abuse of citizens in its own country.
- Disregard for the administration of justice which is totally ignored by the
Canadian judicial system where judges and others who themselves are engaged in
breaking the law and denied citizens their rights to a fair judicial process which is often tainted by racism and bias
- A history of human rights abuse that has been ignored for the most part.
- Continued violation of the United Nations Charter on Human Rights as well as
other standards set by the International Human Rights Courts in its own country
- A deliberate attempt to deceive others regarding its own human rights violations
- A disregard for honoring the international treaties set up to monitor human rights standards in each country
- A racist immigration policy that ignores rather than helps those people of third world countries and especially those from such countries who are seeking asylum in Canada who are deliberately targeted by the Canadian government through this policy against such people and the countries that they are from many of whom are denied their rights under international laws while being in Canada. On the contrary its commitment to those European countries and people from those countries shows the disparity in regards to its international policy in giving aid to those countries.
- All non white people in Canada are deliberately excluded from enjoying the same privileges as whites in this country. This is further enforced by certain racist policies and by the actions of those currently in government. It takes much effort on the part of those communities to be included because there is definitely an agenda by the Canadian government to deny them certain rights that are inherent to them as human beings and as members of this society. Canada practices a double standards both internationally and at home among its own people.

Quote Of The Day

We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."-- Louis Brandeis, US Supreme Court justice from 1916-1939

Note: (This should apply to all so called democratic countries)


Victims of Political persecutions in Canada. The targeting and framing up of political activists and the Torture suffered by victims of Human Rights Abuse and Torture by the Canadian Government.
The code of silence by Human Rights Organizations inside of Canada including Amnesty International regarding some targeted individuals or groups within Canada such Blacks, Palestinians and others.
That country's human rights violations has also included the corruption of the police and other government officials and also their abuse of the basic human rights of specifically targeted persons in that country. Corruption at all levels of government is rampant and most are given immunity for their actions that goes against the fundamentals of human rights and the law. The media also has played a role in the lack of unaccountability on their part by being very bias in its reporting of those human rights violations such as racism that are committed by them and which is actually an institution in this country. This is why the public needs to support those who has exposed this kind of hypocrisy on its part by supporting websites such as this one. It will go a long way towards protecting the human rights of persons including the author of this blog who has also come under attack for exposing the actions of those corrupt Canadian government officials.

Suleyman Goven Speaks out on being tortured by Canadian officials (CSIS) Goven was asked to spy on his community by CSIS in exchange for geting his residency in Canada.

Monday, August 17, 2009


British M.P. George Galloway who was banned from entering Canada is suing the Canadian Immigration Minister Jason Kennedy. Galloway who was scheduled to speak in Canada about the Israeli government's actions was refused entry into Canada and is suing the Canadian Immigration Minister Jason Kennedy for this redress.

Canada's Immigration Minister Jason Kennedy has also enforced a policy that targets people of color and the Palestinians specifically. What most people do not realized is that Palestinians are denied as refugees in Canada. This action by the Canadian government against the Palestinians is directly the result of its relationship with Israel. Palestinians are not considered as conventional refugees by the Canadian government and not even under the United Nations protection such as those offered under its humanitarian and compassionate grounds. Facing persecution and political and social upheaval in their homeland they are still denied refugee status in Canada. I believed that the Canadian people could have benefited from the information that the British M.P. George Galloway would have provided to them had it not been for the interference of Jason Kennedy.

ON THAT NOTE ALSO: Canada has also removed both Israel and the US from off of its torture list as countries that commits torture against its citizens

Suleyman Goven Speaks out on being tortured by Canadian Officials (CSIS) Goven was asked to spy on his community by CSIS in exchange for getting his residency in Canada.

Saturday, August 15, 2009


Corporal Clayton Matchee torture of Somali boy Shidane Arone
Would you call this a peacekeeping mission? or the further promotion of a racist ideology?

Friday, August 14, 2009


These acts of State sponsored terror are usually the work of the Canadian authorities at all levels. And although the police is to be blamed for most of those actions some of the other Canadian government agencies such as CSIS are also to be blamed. Even though the latter is not officially a police agency it still works directly with other police agencies to provide information to them which are also often obtained illegally. For this reason alone it has been implicated in many illegal actions in regards to the gathering of information that are often used against those targets of the government that has included the torture of those persons within Canada as well as to contribute to the torture of other Canadians by other governments around the world. A lot of attention has been given to CSIS actions in regards to allowing the information that it has shared with others that has also led to the direct torture of innocents persons and for reasons that are known only to those involved in such conspiracies. The most famous of which is the Maher Arar case but there are countless other cases which are not so well known that has all contributed to the Canadian government's role in the torture of persons within Canada and elsewhere. In Canada victims of torture often are those who has belonged to a particular group or those who has advocated against this government's actions regarding social injustices in this country. Others are targeted for different reasons and I might add that none of those reasons are justified in the attacks against them. These are well orchestrated attacks and involved the used of methods that are illegal and often detrimental to the victims. The victims also has no recourse for help in this country as torture is not recognized as taking place in in this country by both the Canadian government and other Human Rights Organizations within Canada. This is of course a false view with regards to that issue and it is only by reading about this information from those who has been directly affected by this government's actions such as on this blog that you will get an insight as to the real truth in regards to that issue. In the meantime I encouraged you to support all victims of torture and human rights abuse by the Canadian government and you can start doing so by supporting this blog directly and the author who is also a victim of this government's conspiracy against her that has also seen the destruction of her life and other illegal actions by the Canadian government against her that has also denied her her rights within this country and has also violated international laws in regards to Human Rights regarding her case. This has included all Canadian government agencies working against her including the police and their tireless efforts to undermine her success and to destroy her outright. Everything written about them in regards to her case is factual and has continued up until the present time. As a result of the actions taken against her by those corrupted Canadian government agencies and officials she has become an advocate for social justice in Canada. Exposing the truth in regards to its human rights abuse and its disregards for respecting the rights of all persons in this country.

Re: The Canadian Centre For Victims Of Torture


It is necessary first to also define what torture is under the United Nations Convension Against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Torture under that article is defined as:

Any act by which severe pain or suffering whether physical or mental is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him, or a third person, information or a confession punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.
– Convention Against Torture, Article 1.1
Further to quote from the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims
"From this definition, it can be said that torture is the intentional infliction of severe mental or physical pain or suffering by or with the consent of the state authorities for a specific purpose. The aim of torture is to break down the victim's personality and is often used to punish obtain information or a confession take revenge on a person or create terror and fear within a population...
Torture is distinguished from other forms of ill-treatment by the severe degree of suffering involved. It encompasses many forms of suffering, both physical and psychological, which are remarkably similar worldwide. Most techniques seek to prolong the victims' pain and fear for as long as possible without leaving visible evidence...
It is important not to forget about psychological forms of ill-treatment which very often have the most long-lasting consequences for victims...Who are the victims?...Frequent victims are politicians, union leaders, journalists health professionals, human rights defenders, people in detention, or prison members of ethnic minorities and student leaders.
Victims of torture do not suffer alone. In many cases the victims' families and friends are also affected. The broader society may also be indirectly affected. The use of torture sends a strong warning to those within a political social or religious opposition. Who are the perpetrators? Those most likely to be involved in torture and other forms of ill-treatment are:
• the police
• the military
• paramilitary forces
• state-controlled contra-guerrilla forces. But perpetrators may also include:
• prison officers
• death squads
• any government official
• health professionals
• co-detainees acting with the approval or on the orders of public officials

I have started a public campaign against the Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture. This is because this agency has been complacent in regards to victims of torture within Canada. It does not support such victims or even recognized such actions taking place within Canada and it also reports directly back to the Canadian government though it is not a government agency. This is not helping the situation for those victims of abuse and torture within this country most of whom have been targeted by the Canadian authorities and in some cases by the Canadian government directly. I have given this subject wide coverage on my blog because I have been personally affected by the actions of those Canadian authorities and knows of other cases as well taking place within this country that violates international standards on human rights. DO NOT SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS LIKE CANADIAN CENTRE FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE. Until this organization recognizes and helps those victims of torture within this country its should not even be considered as being of any help in that area. It must begin to take such claims that are happening here, just as seriously as it does for those other cases that it is mandated to investigate on behalf of the Canadian government. I believe that it has compromised its position by not officially recognizing such cases within Canada. Of course, the Canadian government endorses this position. But that is not exactly the truth of the matter. I respect any person or organization who is bold enough to speak the truth on these issues.


The Price Of Freedom In This Country
Why I believed more than ever that this kind of corruption needs to be exposed because it directly jeopardizes the well being of people in this society. I'm going to talk here of one that I know of personally. Why? Because it involves me directly. The conspirators here are all known to me and has played a role in certain actions that were taken against me that were detrimental to me of course. Because of the fact that legal actions has been taken against some of them already and that more legal actions are definitely being considered I don't mind mentioning some of the details (but not all) here. One of those that I believed to be involved in those attacks against me is Adam Sherman. He works for a company called Mintz and Parners that I have already mentioned here on my blog. That company manages the Coop that I live in and it is also funded by the City of Toronto to oversee the everyday management of the Coop as well as other properties or assets of the City of Toronto. Questions has already come up in regards to its activities including promoting racism at the Coop by its own employees such as Adam Sherman (who has also been strangely silent on that issue and as the Manager of the Coop has taken absolutely no actions to protect the rights of those Members who are affected by those actions some of them being called the "N" word and others like me who has been personally targeted and harassed on the direct instructions of Adam Sherman who has also given protection to those Members who has targeted other Members of the Coop and those Members are also white. Other concerns about them has also included the mismanagement of funds and the maintenance of the building. What they (Mintz and Partners)wants to do is to continue to to hold on to their contract with the City of Toronto while at the same time have acted in ways that are not in the best interest of the public. And when a few days ago Adam Sherman was given some documents in regards to an investigation I immediately saw an increased in the harassment by some neighbours which also came as no surprised to me because it is the usual action that has been taken by him in the past as well as now against those who has complained about his actions as well as by the company that he has also represented. I have mentioned those incidences here on my blog because as a member of the public I get tired of those others in this society who believes that some people should not have the same rights that they do and go about ways in which to deprived them of those rights that they have. Exposing their actions publicly I find has served as a deterrent to those publicly appointed persons such as Adam Sherman and others mentioned by me here that goes against public interest. Another one of the conspirators in this I believed is of course the 13 Division Police in my area. It has worked closely with those mentioned directly in the conspiracy against others including me. Again I have evidence to prove my case and has mentioned some already here on my blog. When I first moved into the building I was told this fact by other residents but I had to witnessed it for myself to believe it. The fact is that this information about them and especially in promoting racism against others in this society is definitly true and they have also used intimidation against certain people to keep them and others from taking any kind of actions against them or against those involved such as the Management in this case or against the people that works for that company such as Adam Sherman and others.

Thursday, August 6, 2009


When Toronto City Council convened on August 5, 2009, after the recent strike by T.O. City Employees, the Toronto City Council Members made a proposal, to have an indemnity, made against any members of the public who chose to publicly speak out against their actions. This would've also included the media who was their primary focus, as well as any other members of the public, who has exposed their actions. The proposal which is not new, but has been around since 2005, I believed, they also wanted to get approval for. They wanted legal protection against such an action, from the public and some Toronto City Council Members, such as Howard Moscoe, who spoke in favour of the indemnity, that would also have been paid for by the taxpayers. The indemnity which they are seeking, would have allowed Toronto Council Members, to legally go after the public, as well as to have the public pay for their legal expenses while doing so. It should also be mentioned here that nowhere else in Canada, has this kind of indemnity for Council Members, been honored. Of the sixty eight municipalities across Canada, none has concurred in regards to this indemnity, that was proposed by Toronto City Council Members, who has sought to have total immunity from public opinion and to have the public pay for their legal expenses, in those so called defamation lawsuits. Those members who wanted the public to foot the bill, while taking legal actions against them for exercising, their right to speak openly about their government, or about any elected public official, that they have placed in office, has included those Council Members, that I also strongly believed has something to hide. Not only is this proposal ridiculous when it is taken at face value, but it is also unconstitutional and fortunately, it was vetoed by other Members at the Toronto City Council, who most likely saw, that what their fellow Council Members were really seeking, was actually more power. And by that I also mean more ways in which to go about their actions freely and also secretly, some of which are also detrimental to the public, and without any accountability on their part. They wanted a law that would cover any criminality on their part, as if the current laws were not sufficient, for providing them with the supposed protection, that they claimed that they needed from the public. Since all are considered equal under the law, I think that those politicians wanted more. They wanted it seemed to be exempted from it altogether. It would definitely be a precedent, that would have been set, had their proposal gone through. But no one is really serious that it would have gone through anyway, because it lacked substance and was stupid in the first place. The proposed indemnity from the public, would have also been unfounded, since it is for all practical purposes, not based on any legitimate claims, but only on the assumptions of those politicians, who are offended and perhaps afraid of the public exercising their right to freedom of speech, or of exposing their actions. Laws already exist that gives them as much protection as they also needed, like other members of the public and seeking to have more immunity, is totally unfounded and ridiculous. Their reasons for such an indemnity are superfluous and are not based on anything that any sensible person could accept. It is only based on what those politicians perceived as grievances, that they believed are being committed against them by the public. Those grievances are about reporting on their actions that may also go against public interest. They prefer if they are left to their own ways when carrying out the role of government and the public must not interfere with their actions even if those action are wrong and are also detrimental to the public. Freedom of speech is not only guaranteed, but also protected under the law. The United Nations Charter on Human Rights, which all truly democratic governments must also respect, has explicitly given the right of the people, to speak openly about their government, without fear of retaliation on its part. Those who has ignored this right, are those governments, which has acted corruptly. I have been saying all along that this government is corrupted and does the public need any more proof than this.