I WASTED MY TIME AND EFFORT, ASKING FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, FROM THIS WICKED JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS. SHE NEVER EVEN, CONSIDERED, SUCH A REQUEST.
SHE IS JUST ANOTHER, CORRUPT, CANADIAN JUDGE, NOW BEING EXPOSED. ONTARIO JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, IS RACIST AND UNDESERVING, TO REPRESENT, THE PUBLIC, IN HER ROLE AS A JUDGE.
CANADIAN JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, IS NOT ONLY CORRUPT, BUT SHE IS ALSO WICKED AND EVIL. PERIOD. SHE IS ONE OF THE FIRST, CANADIAN JUDGES, THAT I WILL BE CHARGING, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CARRYING OUT CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, AGAINST ME. SHE HAS NO REGARD, FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND IS ALSO A RACIST AND AFTER MY DEALINGS WITH HER, I HAVE NO RESPECT, FOR THE CANADIAN COURT.
She is undeserving, as a judge, to represent the Canadian public. She is a disgusting, human being, if I can even consider her as such. I am so disgusted, by her corruption, as a judge, and her lack of regard, for administering the law, that I will also charge her, in the ICC.
I WASTED MY TIME AND EFFORT, ASKING FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, FROM THIS WICKED JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS. SHE NEVER EVEN, CONSIDERED, SUCH A REQUEST. SHE ALSO NEVER EVEN CONSIDERED, THE HARM, THAT WOULD ALSO RESULT, TO ME, BY REFUSING TO GRANT ME, EQUITABLE RELIEF, WHICH UNDER CANADIAN LAW, TAKES PRECEDENCE, AND EVEN PARAMOUNTCY, OVER THE COMMON LAW. THE ONTARIO STATUTE, THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT. R.SO. 1990. c, C-43 STATES, UNDER SECTION 96(1) AND (2), THAT THIS RULE OF LAW, IS TO BE APPLIED, CONCURRENTLY, WITH THE COMMON LAW. AND IF THERE IS A CONFLICT, THEN THE LAW OF EQUITY, MUST ALSO PREVAILED.
THIS WAS NOT SO, WITH THIS CORRUPT JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, WHO EVEN IN HER CORRUPTION, MADE THE SAME DECISION TWICE, IN TWO DIFFERENT URGENT MOTIONS, (FOR WHICH THE SECOND, URGENT MOTION, SHOULD NOT HAVE ALSO, BEEN BROUGHT BEFORE HER, BUT WHICH SHE ACCEPTED, FROM THE EQUALLY, CORRUPT, SUPERVISOR, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVERIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, WHO INSISTED, THAT THE SAME JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, MUST HEAR THE SAME URGENT MOTION, SINCE SHE WAS THE JUDGE, WHO HAD HEARD THE FIRST URGENT MOTION. SO THIS SUPERVISOR, BROUGHT THE SECOND, URGENT MOTION, BACK TO THE SAME JUDGE, AFTER SHE HAD RULED, NEGATIVELY, ON THE FIRST URGENT MOTION. BOTH MOTIONS, WAS ASKING FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, ALONG WITH HER ADMINISTRATION, OF THE COMMON LAW. THE WICKED JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, KNEW THAT I WOULD BECOME HOMELESS AND ALSO SUFFER HARM, IF SHE DID NOT MAKE AN ORDER, TO STOP THE RESPONDENT, FROM GOING AGAINST, THE EXISTING ORDER, OR ENDORSEMENT, FROM ANOTHER JUDGE, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT, AFTER BEING SERVED, WITH MY EX PARTE MOTION, THAT I HAD FILED IN THE COURT AND ALSO SERVED ON THE RESPONDENT, AND ALSO THE MOTION, THAT I HAD FILED, WITH THE SCJ, IN THE BRAMPTON COURTHOUSE, TO TRANSFER THE FILE, TO THAT COURTHOUSE, WHICH WAS ALSO, THE PROPER JURISDICTION, TO HEAR THE CASE. THE MOTION BEING FILED, ON APRIL 15TH AND TO BE HEARD, BY THE COURT, ON APRIL 23RD, AFTER SERVICE WAS ALSO MADE, ON THE RESPONDENT,SHIP.
WHEN THE RESPONDENT, SHIP'S LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, CONTACTED, ME ON APRIL 18, 2024, CLAIMING, THAT SHE HAD ONLY RECEIVED, THE MOTION AND FACTUM, (FROM HER CLIENT, SHIP) AND NOT THE MOTION RECORD, AND ALSO CLAIMED, THAT SHE HAD ALSO NOT RECEIVED, THE JUDGE'S ENDORSEMENT, FROM THE PREVIOUS JUDGE, FROM THER CLIENT, THIS WAS ALSO LEADING, UP TO SOMETHING, SINISTER, ON HER PART. (SHE IS HERE CLAIMING, THAT SHE DOES NOT KNOW, ABOUT THE ORDER, OR ENDORSEMENT, FROM THE PREVIOUS JUDGE, JUSTICE GRANT DOW AND BY DOING SO, SHE IS NOW FREE TO ACT, IN A CONSPIRACY, WITH HER CLIENT, TO EVICT ME). IT WAS THE COURT'S JOB, TO SEND OUT THE ENDORSEMENT, TO BOTH PARTIES. AND IF THE LAWYER WANTED THE ENDORSEMENT, SHE COULD HAVE ASKED THE COURT, FOR A COPY. THE ENDORSEMENT, CAME FROM THE COURT AND NOT ME. IT WAS ALSO MENTIONED IN MY MOTION, THAT WAS ALSO SERVED ON HER CLIENT, ON APRIL 15TH, TO TRANSFER THE FILE, TO THE BRAMPTON COURT. WHICH WAS ALSO IN MY URGENT MOTION, THE WICKED JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, ALSO KNEW THAT EVERYBODY, WAS ON BOARD, AS FAR AS THE CASE. SHE SHOULD HAVE NOT ALLOWED, THE RESPONDENT SHIP AND THEIR LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, TO EVICT ME, WHILE THE MATTER WAS STILL BEFORE THE COURT. AND AFTER I HAD DONE ALL THAT THE COURT, HAD ORDERED ME TO DO. THE PREVIOUS JUDGE, HAD NOT DISMISSED MY URGENT MOTION, BUT HAD PUT CERTAIN CONDITIONS, FOR IT TO BE HEARD, BY THE COURT. WHY DID THE CORRUPT JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, ALSO NOT ALLOWED THE COURT'S PROCESS, TO CONTINUE, UNINTERRUPTED, BY THE RESPONDENT AND TO PROTECT MY RIGHTS, WHILE THE MATTER WAS STILL BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE?. I WILL TELL YOU WHY, BECAUSE SHE COULD NOT HAVE CARED LESS, IN HER CORRUPTION, AS A JUDGE, WHETHER THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, WAS IMPLEMENTED, IN MY CASE. SHE WAS BIAS AND CORRUPT, BY EVEN DECIDING TWICE, ON THE SAME MATTER. RES JUIDICATA. SOMETHING THE PREVIOUS JUDGE, GRANT DOW, HAD ALSO TRIED TO AVOID, IN HIS ENDORSEMENT. THIS JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, TOOK UP WHOLEHEARTEDLY. HAS SHE NOT EVER READ MY BLOG?. I CANNOT WAIT, TO START PROCEDURES AGAINST HER, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.
AS A LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, SHOULD HAVE INSTRUCTED HER CLIENT, TO RESPECT THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND TO LET THE COURT DO ITS JOB AND NOT TO ACT IN PLACE OF THE COURT. NOWHERE IN THE ENDORSEMENT, DID IT STATE, THAT THE CASE WAS FINAL. RATHER, IT STATED, THAT THE ORDER WAS MADE, WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND THAT SERVICE OF MY EX-PARTE MOTION, WAS TO BE MADE, ON THE RESPONDENT AND THAT FINALLY, THAT I SHOULD HAVE THE CASE, TRANSFERRED, TO THE BRAMPTON COURT, FROM TORONTO SCJ, SINCE THAT WAS WHERE BOTH PARTIES, WERE LOCATED. I FIRMLY BELIEVED, THAT ZOHAR LEVY, INSTRUCTED HER CLIENT, TO IGNORE THE COURT PROCESS AND TO EVICT ME, WHILE THE CASE WAS WAITING, TO BE HEARD, BY THE COURT. SINCE NOW, BOTH PARTIES' MOTIONS, WERE NOW TO BE HEARD AND DECIDED BY THE COURT. LAWYER ZOHAR LEVY AND HER CLIENT, TRIED TO CIRCUMVENT THIS PROCESS, AND THE WICKED JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, KNEW THAT THIS WAS THE CASE, AND ALSO ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN. THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, ALSO DID NOT BOTHER TO FILE, HER RESPONDING MOTION, AFTER BEING SERVED, WITH MY EX-PARTE MOTION, AFTER THE JUDGE, GRANT DOW, HAD MADE IN HIS ENDORSEMENT, THAT I SERVED THE RESPONDENT, WITH MY EX-PARTE MOTION.
I WILL BE BACK IN COURT, NEXT WEEK, TO TAKE FURTHER, LEGAL ACTIONS, AGAINST THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY AND THE DIRECTOR OF SHIP, LESLEY LAGODA, WHOSE ACTIONS, BY INSTRUCTING ME, TO FORCIBLY, BREAK AN ORDER OF THE COURT, THE ORDER BEING, THE ENDORSEMENT, OF THE JUDGE, GRANT DOW, WHICH DID NOT TELL ME TO LEAVE, BUT WHICH THEY DID, BY THIS EVICTION, IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE. IT IS CALLED, COUNCELLING TO COMMIT AN OFFENCE. CONSPIRACY, CORRUPTION AND BREACH OF TRUST, CHARGES, AGAINST THEM, ARE ALSO PENDING.
AS FAR AS MY CIVIL MATTER, I WILL BE FILING ANOTHER URGENT MOTION IN THE SCJ, TO RECTIFY, WHAT THE WICKED AND EVIL JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, HAD DONE, TO UNDERMINE MY POSITION, REGARDING THIS CIVIL LITIGATION. I WANT THE COURT,
