IT IS ALWAYS A DANGEROUS THING, TO EXPOSED, CORRUPTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, BY A CORRUPT GOVERNMENT.
THE TORONTO POLICE 14 DIVISION, HAS REFUSED TO RELEASE AND HAS ALSO DENIED, THAT THERE IS A VIDEO, THAT SHOWS A PRISONER IN A CELL, AT THE POLICE STATION. SOMETHING WHICH IS ALSO A STANDARD PROCEDURE. THE VIDEO IS ALSO NECESSARY, TO SHOW THAT THE POLICE, HAS ALSO LIED IN THEIR REPORT, ABOUT THE 'ALLEGED' LEGAL AID LAWYER, THAT THEY HAD ALSO PROVIDED, ON THE TELEPHONE, AT THE STATION, TO THE PRISONER.
THIS LEGAL AID LAWYER, WHO HAD ALSO TOLD THE PRISONER, ALLEGEDLY, "DO NOT GIVE YOUR DNA TO THE POLICE" AND "DON'T LET THE POLICE TAKE AN HAIR SAMPLE", WHILE ON THE TELEPHONE WITH THE PRISONER, AT THE POLICE STATION, IN FEBRUARY OF 2013. WHICH WAS ALL RECORDED, ON THE VIDEO CAMERA, THAT WAS ALSO HANGING FROM THE CEILING. THE SIMPLE QUESTION IS THIS? WHICH LEGAL AID LAWYER, WHO IS ALSO CURRENTLY PRACTICING IN ONTARIO, DO NOT ALSO KNOW, THAT, THE POLICE WOULD ALSO NEED A COURT ORDER, TO TAKE EITHER A DNA, OR A HAIR SAMPLE, FROM A PRISONER?. THE POLICE DO NOT HAVE THE LEGAL AUTHORITY, TO ARBITRARILY TAKE A PERSON'S BLOOD AND HAIR SAMPLES, WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT.
HOURS LATER, AFTER BEING RELEASED AT THE STATION, THE POLICE WAS ALSO ASKED BY THE ACCUSED, ABOUT THE 'ALLEGED' LEGAL AID LAWYER, AND TO WHICH SHE ALSO GOT THE FOLLOWING RESPONSE, FROM THE POLICE, "I THOUGHT YOU SAID THAT YOU WERE GOING TO PROVIDE YOUR OWN LAWYER". SO THEN WHO THE HELL WAS SHE TALKING TO, ON THE TELEPHONE
AND WHO THE POLICE ALSO CLAIMED WAS A LEGAL AID LAWYER?.
THE ACCUSED IN THIS CASE, IS ALLEGING, THAT THE POLICE THEMSELVES, HAD ALSO PRETENDED TO BE A 'LEGAL AID LAWYER', ON THE TELEPHONE WITH THE ACCUSED, IN ORDER TO GET MORE INFORMATION, OUT OF HER, TO USE AGAINST HER. AND THAT IS WHY THEY WERE, ALSO, LATER SURPRISED, WHEN SHE ALSO ASKED FOR THE NAME OF THE 'ALLEGED' LEGAL AID LAWYER, THAT SHE HAD ALSO SPOKEN TO, ON THE TELEPHONE, AND WHILE AT THE POLICE STATION. AN INCIDENT THAT WAS ALSO RECORDED.
NOW THE TORONTO POLICE 14 DIVISION, AS WELL AS THE CROWN ATTORNEY, ARE ALSO SAYING THAT NO SUCH VIDEO EXIST. THEY ALSO WANT TO RUSH TO A TRIAL, WITHOUT THIS DISCLOSURE BEING PROVIDED BY THE POLICE. NEVER MIND, THAT, THE POLICE HAD ALSO TAKEN MONTHS, TO PRODUCE THE OTHER EVIDENCE, THAT WAS ALSO REQUESTED FROM THEM, BY THE ACCUSED. A DELAY, WHICH SHOULD ALSO GO AGAINST, BOTH THE POLICE AND THE CROWN ATTORNEY. BUT NOT WHEN YOU ARE ALSO DEALING WITH A COURT, THAT IS ALSO ALREADY BIAS, AGAINST THE ACCUSED.
IMAGINE GOING BEFORE A COURT AND ITS JUDGES, OR JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, FOR THAT MATTER, THAT YOU HAVE ALSO BEEN REPORTING ON, ABOUT THEIR CORRUPTION, IN THE MEDIA? THOSE VERY SAME JUDGES, WHO HAD ALSO REFUSED, TO FILE ANY CHARGES AGAINST THE POLICE, PREVIOUSLY, BY THE SAME PERSON NOW BEING ACCUSED.
AND IMAGINE AS WELL, HOW THEY HAVE ALSO CONVENIENTLY, OVERLOOKED, THE ACTIONS OF THE POLICE AND THE CROWN, IN FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURES OF THE COURT, IN THIS CASE?.
The general rule of the court, is not to discuss matters, that are also before the court. Well, this can also be changed, when that very court, is also acting corruptly. And when the lives of the people who
are also before the court, is also damaged in some way, by the court's actions. And in the interest of human rights everywhere, I will also exposed here, the actions of the Canadian court, in regards to trying to set me up and to also silence me. This of course involved the actions of the police as well.
Let's go back to 2013 and the charge of assault that was also levied against me, by someone who I also believed, was acting as a police agent provocateur and an informer for the Toronto police. The complainant also claimed in the report, that there are also no other witnesses, besides herself and the person that she is also accusing. There are also questions about her legal status in Canada, as well. In fact, the name that is used in the police record about her, also do not match the name that she is also known, by those who are close to her, including her family and others who are also privy to that information. I had also previously exposed her, on this blog, along with Hughes Idholo, the man who had also threatened to kill my animal and in that case, who the police had also changed the name of the accused, in order to protect him. He is also believed to have also acted as an agent provocateur and informer, for the police. His case at that court, the Old City Hall courthouse, in Toronto, also never went to trial, thanks to the interference of both the police and the crown attorney, at that court.
And in that same case, also, the police did not provided the 911 tape, of his statements, that were also caught on the 911 tape, to the court. the crown attorney, just simply withdrew the matter, rather than to provide this evidence, to the court.
If you think that the Canadian court, is also not capable of conducting secret trials, or of deleting evidence that is also necessary, in order to protect the person being accused, then you should also think again? It happens all of the time. What it also does not get is a lot of exposure, like I am doing here. I will also not willingly lay my head down to be chopped off. I will always fight for my rights.
Toronto police 14 division, please provide the video and also the tape recording, of this 'alleged' legal aid lawyer, that you've also claimed that you have provided. I dare you to do so and let the court also act upon this evidence. Stop withholding evidence, that is also necessary, for the preservation of justice. But of course you will not.