A SERIOUS BREACH IN PULIC TRUST, BY JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, AT THE OLD CITY HALL COURT.
THE OFFICE OF THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, AT OLD CITY HALL COURT, ACTS DIFFERENTLY, FROM MOST OTHER COURTS IN CANADA, WITH A PENCHANT, FOR CORRUPTION.
|Two Justices of the Peace, at the Old City Hall Court, in Toronto, are found guilty of misconduct.|
Justice of the Peace, Solange Gubernan, on the left and Paul Kowarsky to the right. These two corrupt justices of the peace, also had their legal bills, amounting to more than $200,000.00, also paid for by the tax payers. Yet poor litigants and accused persons, who also appears before them, are not even able to get legal aid, to pay for their lawyers to defend them.
CHARGES ARE NOW PENDING, AGAINST A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, SANDRA ANSTEY, AT THE OLD CITY HALL AND ALSO AGAINST THE CLERK, IN THAT OFFICE. THE CHARGES ARE FOR OBSTRUCING JUSTICE, IN A LEGAL PROCEEDING AND ALSO FOR A BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST, REGARDING THE SAME MATTER.
AN UPDATE, TO THE ARTICLE BELOW. Dated July 13, 2015
Charges are pending against a Toronto Justice of the Peace, Sandra Anstey and also against a senior clerk, in the office of the Justice of the Peace, at the Old City Hall Courthouse. The charges are for a
breach of public trust and also for obstructing justice, during a legal proceeding. The charges which were brought about by this writer, also alleged, that both the Justice of the Peace and also the clerk, in that office, are also responsible for, deliberately, failing to have the informant sign the necessary documents, pertaining to the private charges, or information. And also failing to carry out other duties, that are related to their office, by also not providing the informant, with a copy of the court document, that would have also included the specific date and time of the pre-enquette hearing, as well as the courtroom, it was to be held in.
As a result the informant then missed the pre-enquette hearing of her information, which was to be heard on July 13, 2015. Having not been given a time of the hearing, or of the courtroom, it was to be held in. The informant then as a result has missed having her matter heard, on that day. The said clerk then also provided the informant, on July 13th, now with a written copy of another hearing date, of a pre-enquette hearing, that was scheduled for July 24, 2015 at 10.00 a.m. Again with no courtroom indicated on the document. The informant was told that she would also be advised, of which courtroom to attend on that date. The informant believe that the information, was also incomplete. And that this was also done, deliberately, by the office of the justice of the peace and also by those persons involved. Which was also the practice of the Office of the Justice of the Peace and also of that court against her. The informant also alleged that she was never given a written copy, of the pre-enquette hearing set for July 13, 2015, with a specific date and time, or with a specific courtroom to attend, on July 13, 2015. This was also deliberately done to pervert the course of justice and to prevent her from proceeding with her legal matter, before the court. And that this is also a violation of her rights, as well as a criminal act, on the part of the perpetrators, in the Office of the Justice of the Peace, who are also not above the law, and should also be treated the same as anyone else, who also breaks the law.
According to the Informant, in her own words: (From the perspective of a victim of a crime).
The clerk then claim that she did give me a copy, WHICH IS AN ABSOLUTE LIE!. I confronted her with a rebuttal. NO YOU DID NOT!. She then told me to wait outside of the Office of the Justice of the Peace and she would reschedule another date, for the pre-enquette hearing. That also got me to thinking this matter over. And also came up with this very disturbing conclusion. That in fact the fault lies with the Office of the Justice of the Peace. And with both the Justice of the Peace, Sandra Anstey, who was involved in taking the information, from me initially, and also with the clerk, for not following proper procedure, in giving me a copy with the necessary information, that would have avoided all of this mess, in the first place. Knowing that court, in particular, I would also not be surprised, if on the day of the pre-enquette hearing, that my information is also missing. My documents seem to go missing a lot at that court, (see the accompanying video posted with this article). And that was why I had also insisted, on having a copy of my information, for my own records. According to the Office of the Justice of the Peace, at Old City Hall, however, only they get to keep a copy of the information. But what if it gets lost? What does someone do at a hearing, with no information to proceed on? And if the court’s only copy is also lost and this happens more often than you might think. Just imagine what that could also mean for the person caught up in this?. They would have to lay those charges all over again. That office probably also feared, that I would make it public, but they should also know me better by now. Why would I screw up the case before it is even heard by doing that? Unless of course, it was also in the interest of justice to do so. That is in protecting both my rights and also other members of the public, by exposing what was taking place at that court.
Article for June 26, 2015(Written in the first person).
My apology for the way that the page appears. For some reason, after writing this article, there was also some difficulty, in posting it. In fact, I also lost some of its original content at the beginning of the article and had to rewrite it. Secondly, I also had trouble uploading the picture, which ended up erasing some of the article, when it was posted. Sorry for the inconvenience.