EGYA NDAYINANSE SANGMUAH, VICE CHAIR, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.
CORRUPTION AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. THE VICE CHAIR, EGYA SANGMUAH, AND A NUMBER OF ADJUDICATORS, INCLUDING, SYLVIA WATSON, LOUISE HORTON AND RUTH CAREY, SHOULD ALL BE RELINQUISHED, FROM THEIR DUTIES. AS WELL AS TO FACE CHARGES, OVER THEIR PERSONAL CORRUPTION, IN THE ADJUDICATING, OF SOME CASES, BEFORE THE BOARD.
I INTEND TO CONTACT THE PREMIER OF ONTARIO, KATHLEEN WIN, OVER THE RE-APPOINTMENT, IN JANUARY OF 2017, OF THE VICE CHAIR OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, EGYA SANGMUAH. IN MY OPINION, HIS PERSONAL CORRUPTION, AS THE VICE CHAIR, OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, MAKES HIM UNFIT TO HOLD THAT POSITION. THERE IS NO TRANSPARENCY, AT THE BOARD. NOR IS THERE ANY TRANSPARENCY ABOUT HIS ACTIONS. HE COVERS UP FOR MEMBERS, LIKE SYLVIA WATSON, WHOSE ACTIONS ARE SO ADVERSE, TO THE AMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, AND FOR DISREGARDING THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF SOME TENANTS, BOTH UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, AS WELL AS UNDER THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOM. THE LATTER, IN REGARDS TO THE RIGHT TO HAVE A FAIR HEARING. AMONG OTHER PROTECTIONS, UNDER THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION. A FAIR HEARING IS ALSO IMPOSSIBLE, WHEN THERE IS ALSO A PRESUMPTION OF BIAS, IN REGARDS TO TH OSE ADMINISTERING JUSTICE. LIKE THOSE ADJUDICATORS AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.
BECAUSE SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD HAS ACTED EXTREMELY CORRUPTED, IN REGARDS TO MY MATTERS, BEFORE THE BOARD, THEY WILL ALSO HAVE TO FACE THE CONSEQUENSES, FOR THEIR ACTIONS. ONE OF THOSE CONSEQUENCES IS THAT THEY CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO DISREGARD THE LAW, AND ALSO THE TENANT'S RIGHTS, WHEN THEY ADJUDICATE THOSE MATTERS, BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. THE OTHER CONSEQUENCES, ARE THAT THOSE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBERS, SHOULD ALSO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR ACTING CORRUPTLY AND FOR INJURING THOSE APPEARING BEFORE THE BOARD, BY THEIR ACTIONS.
Here are some of their actions, which are blatantly a mockery of justice.
* Egya Sangmuach, Vice Chair, at the North Office of the Landlord and Tenant Board, has (in my case) taken more than the 24-48 hours that are usually required, to respond to my reviews. In the last instance, he and the Board, took three weeks to respond. That review, of Member Sylvia Watson's decision, to dismiss my application, because I could not attend a hearing on May 15th. The Vice Chair Egya Sangmuah, had the review request from me, as of May 17th, yet as the Vice Chair, his response was to bring the matter over to June 5th, so that I could have a review hearing, (and I am sure that they also plan to deny the review of that Member's decision, on May 15th), if I also do not do something drastic, about it. That Member, Sylvia Watson, also denied my right as a tenant, to have summons issued, whereby witnesses (city officials) could be forced to give evidence at the hearing of the tenant's application. (And why the Landlord and Tenant Board, saw it fit, only in my case and not other cases involving those city officials, to allow my tenancy to end, because those city officials wanted it to be so).
* Egya Sangmuah, as the Vice Chair, of the Landlord and Tenant Board, also saw nothing wrong
with a Member, like Sylvia Watson, denying a tenant the right to have witnesses, at a hearing. Yet granting this same privilege to the landlord. Adjudicator Sylvia Watson, also did not sign the order she made, about that decision. That document was also missing from the tenant's file, along with other documents. The tenant feared that the Vice Chair and those Members, also believed that the documents would be made public, or be a part of other legal proceedings against them. In which they are also right, in that assumption. I wonder what the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah, has done with all of my documents, that has gone missing from my file, at the Landlord and Tenant Board, over the last few weeks. Yesterday, a clerk at the Board, had the time of her life, running around and trying to find them. She wasn't pleased, either, that I had insisted on obtaining those documents, from my file and also insisting that they should also be in my file. Her explanation, is that those documents, "could be sitting on anyone's desk". I wonder why that is the case?. When they should also be kept in the file, where they also belong.
* Denying me the right to a fair hearing. Including, making decisions without giving any reasons, for those decisions. And also not signing their signatures to the documents. As Adjudicator Sylvia Watson, is also apt do to, in my matters.
* Logging documents received by the Board, much later in their system than when they had received it, and then later ruling against it, by pretending those documents did not exist at the time. Again, this was done by Sylvia Watson.
BEING A WRITER, REQUIRES A BALANCING ACT. I CAN DISLIKE SOMEONE, PERSONALLY, BUT STILL BE ABLE TO PRESENT THE FACTS, ABOUT THEM. SUCH IS THE CASE WITH EGYA SANGMUAH. I CAN BE THOROUGHLY OBJECTIVE, IN PRESENTING MY CASE, ABOUT HIM. AND/OR AGAINT HIM. I AM A BLOGGER, TOO AND THAT MEANS THAT I ALSO GIVE MY PERSONAL OPINION, ABOUT ANYTHING, OR ABOUT ANYONE. A BLOG, IS NOT YOUR STANDARD FORM OF JOURNALISM, OR REPORTING. AS LONG AS MY STATEMENTS ARE ACCURATE, THEN I DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE FORMAT USED, TO CONVEY THIS INFORMATION, TO THE PUBLIC. SO JUST BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE THIS GUY AND ALL THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE VERY CORRUPT LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, DOES NOT MEAN THAT I ALSO CANNOT BE OBJECTIVE, IN MY REPORTING, ON THEIR ACTIONS. I CAN DO BOTH.
EGYA SANGMUAH, IS YET ANOTHER NAME OF AN ACCUSED PERSON, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT. AND IN REGARDS TO MY MATTER.BEFORE THAT COURT, INVOLVING, HIS PERSONAL CORRUPTION, IN CARRYING OUT THE ABUSE OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS. WHICH HAS ALSO INVOLVED, THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, AND HIS ACTIONS DIRECTLY. ALONG WITH ANOTHER BOARD MEMBER, SYLVIA WATSON, HAS NOW LANDED HIM AS AN ACCUSED PERSON, BEFORE THE ICC. ACCUSED, OF COMMITTING ACTS OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, IN REGARDS TO ME. HE ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHER CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, AND THOSE IN THE COURT AND OR TRIBUNAL/BOARDS, WHO ARE FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES IN THAT COURT FOR THEIR DIRECT ACTIONS, IN CARRYING OUT TORTURE AGAINST ME.
(I intend to rewrite this column and include the pictures of those persons here).
There are some things, that I did not know about the Vice Chair, until today. For one thing, that he was Black, and originally an African national. (Grounds which should also make him more lenient towards other immigrants, or those of his own race. Or of any other marginalized groups, for that matter, living in Canada. For instance, one would not be able to tell this from his actions, as part of the Immigration and Refugee Board, concerning his decisions concerning those people, that he also has so much in common with, individually. He seemed to have acquired the White Canadian's racist views, on some people. An unforgivable sin (or blunder), on his part. That means, of a necessity, also imposing those views, via his decisions, on those same people. Even though he has more in common with them, than with those White racist Canadians, whose views he actually, represents and upholds, as best as he can, as a member of those various Boards, that he sits on. Including, his current position, as the Vice Chair, of the Landlord and Tenant Board. Well, guess what?.
Some of us are not impressed, with your many degrees. What we see based on your actions, is someone acting capriciously, taking advantage of his position and using it to cause harm to others. I would also not have known that Egya Sangmuah had any legal background, based on the kind of stuff, that he allows to happen, at the Landlord and Tenant Board. Take the very basis legal premise, of a fair hearing. I am not the only tenant at the Landlord and Tenant Board, that will tell you, that this also does not exist, by the Members and also under the guidance of the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah. The reason being that most tenants will also settle for their rights being abused, by Board members. They will not take the matter, any further, than the Landlord and Tenant Board. Which makes it all the more easier for Members to act corrupt and to disregard their rights. My accusations against the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah and against those members, like Sylvia Watson, Louise Horton and others at the Landlord and Tenant Board, is that they all conspired to harm me, by dealing corruptly with my matter that is before the Board. That is also grounds for further legal actions against all of them. Including, laying criminal charges against them. In doing so they have also violated my rights under international laws, particularly, those that are designed to protect my dignity, as a human being. Their actions against me, were all calculated to cause me maximum injury.
What they wanted to do was to break my spirit and to destroy me. And that is also why in their decisions involving my case, they also veered so much from the law. Especially, in the case of Adjudicator Sylvia Watson, who as a former lawyer and politician, should be well familiar with the protection offered to the public, via the Constitution and who has also deliberately ignored this fact, and acted corrupt. As a former lawyer, and now Adjudicator with the Landlord and Tenant Board, Sylvia Watson, also knew that I had a right to have witnesses at my hearing, whose testimony were also necessary to established certain facts. She has denied me the three summons that I had requested, requiring those three government officials to attend the hearing. She also believed that one of those witnesses evidence would be sufficient (as she and the Board, has allowed the landlord to have one of those same government officials, summoned, by the Landlord and Tenant Board and to give evidence, on his behalf. What was the evidence to which the Board also granted him the summons?. That the government official (from the fire department),provide the proof that he could no longer rent out the unit. All the landlord had to do, was to bring those same written notices to the Board, instead of requiring a summons for the government official to attend the hearing. He got the summons in less than 48 hours from the Board and the government official, ( T.O. fire inspector, Mark Spedaliere) also showed up at the hearing, because he wanted to assist the landlord, (who had broken the law by the way, and hence the notices against him, by the fire department), to have the upper hand at the hearing, and for the tenant, me, not to be allowed to get back into my home.
The tenant, me, actually had two means of egress. A door and a window, although the dutiful fire inspector, only focused on one exist, during his testimony. The secondary exit (window), also leads directly to the backyard and directly from the tenant's bedroom, should there be a fire. In fact, the tenant's window is so large, it also covers one third of the room. It could easily provide a means of exist and escape, should there be a fire. This evidence was also hidden by the T.O. fire officials, in their reports. The law only requires one exist and the tenant had two such exists. The egress from the tenant's window, was also excluded from the testimony of the corrupt fire official, because he wanted THAT tenant, meaning me, not to be able to remain in her home. At the same time this corrupt T.O. fire officials also allowed the landlord to continue to overcrowd the rental house, allowing him to still have double the occupancy load, than what the Ontario Fire Code allows. Once he was given the two notices by the T.O Fire Services over the overcrowding and lack of working fire systems, the owner, had also decided that it was not profitable to keep the rental property.
He told the tenants that he planned to sell the house in April. That did not happen, because since he was also never charged over his actions and more corruptly, since he was also allowed to keep his other tenants, despite the overcrowding and the continued breaking of the fire code, not to mention knowingly putting the lives of the tenant in danger, he no longer wanted to sell the rental property. We are now into May and the landlord has also continued, just has he had done before. With maintaining a building that was unsafe for all of the tenants, not just the one tenant that they wanted to get out of the building, for complaining about the landlord's illegal actions. And for which the tenant was rewarded by being evicted, illegally. Both by the Fire Services and by the Board, via the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah, who has stated that "even if the Board could reinstate the tenant, it would not, because the fire services deem it unsafe". As far as the law is concerned, the Board has also overturned other cases, where the Fire Services, had taken it upon itself, to evict a tenant, without the Board having a saying in the mater. In those precedents set by the Landlord and Tenant Board, the Board has unequivocally stated, that it is only the Landlord and Tenant Board, which has the right to evict those tenants. And not the Toronto Fire Services. The tenants were also reinstated in their homes and the landlords were also fined heavily by the Board, for those violations. None of that has happened in my case, due to the corruption involved. The question then is, why are those Canadian government officials, including those at the Board, surprised that I am taking this action further?. That they can't just act corrupt and not answer for their actions. Since they had all conspired to destroy me, in that way. AND had also hope to get away scotch free, with their actions. Actually, they had hoped that their deeds would never see the light of day, much less for them to answer in a court of law and facing charges over their actions.