REPORTS OF REFUGEE FRAUD, AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, IN MISSISSAUGA, PEEL REGION AND THE LACK OF SHELTER BEDS, FOR THE REGULAR, HOMELESS CANADIANS, AT THE SHELTER.

CLEAR EVIDENCE, OF A POSSIBLE, "MASSIVE REFUGEE FRAUD", COVER-UP, THAT IS BEING, PERPETRATED,  AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, IN MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO.  WHERE THAT SHELTER, HAS BEEN USED, AS A "LANDING PLATFORM", OR A "STOP OVER", FOR THE MASSIVE INFLUX, OF KENYAN, UGANDAN AND NIGERIAN, "REFUGEES".  WHO MAKES THE SHELTER, THEIR SEMI PERMANENT, HOME, FOR THE NEXT SEVERAL MONTHS, TO A YEAR, WHILE THEY ALSO WAIT, FOR THEIR REFUGEE APPLICATIONS, TO BE PROCESSED.  AND THE MAJORITY OF THOSE APPLICATIONS, ARE ALSO FRAUDULENT.  

    *  KENYAN REFUGEES AND UGANDAN AND NIGERIAN REFUGEES, STAND A 90%                CHANCE, OF GETTING INTO THE CAWTHRA ROAD HOMELESS SHELTER.  

   *  REGULAR HOMELESS CANADIANS, STAND A 10% CHANCE OF GETTING INTO 

       THE SAME SHELTER. 

   *  FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC, IT WAS ALSO DISTURBING TO SEE, THOSE  "REFUGEES", COMING TO THE SHELTER, WEARING DESIGNER CLOTHES AND CARRYING DESIGNER LUGGAGE, MOST OF THEM, AND YET CLAIMING, THAT THEY ARE ALSO FLEEING, PERSECUTION, IN THEIR FORMER COUNTRIES.  IF THEY HAD THAT KIND OF MONEY, WHY ARE THEY ALSO, IMMEDIATELY, GIVEN WELFARE BENEFITS, AS SOON AS THEY ARE ADMITTED, INTO THE SHELTER?. PLUS TRANSPORTATION COST, (MONEY), FOR LAWYER APPOINTMENTS, TO HELP THEM WITH THEIR BOGUS APPLICATIONS, (MOST OF THEM), WHICH I BELIEVED, IS ALSO PAID FOR BY THE GOVERNMENT. 

  IT IS EASY, TO BUY YOUR WAY, INTO CANADA, WITH A BOGUS REFUGEE 

  DOCUMENT.  

 SOME OF THOSE "REFUGEES", LIKE THE ONE WHO IS CURRENTLY, IN A ROOM

 (ROOM 221), AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, WHO LIKES TO BRAG, THAT SHE

 HAS BEEN TO FIVE OTHER COUNTRIES, INCLUDING, TURKEY, AND HAS ALSO MET

 WITH RUSSIANS, BEFORE COMING TO CANADA.  AND THAT SHE ALSO HAD A     HOUSE ALSO HAD A HOUSE IN KENYA, WHICH SHE IS ALSO, CONTEMPLATING,   GOING BACK TO. SHE BELIEVES THAT CANADA, IS TOO COLD AND LIFE, IS TOO   HARD HERE. FOR THE FIVE DAYS, OR SO, THAT SHE HAS LANDED IN CANADA. 

 SHE IS AREADY COMPLAINING. SHE IS ALSO PRONED TO ACT, AGGRESSIVE, AND

 VIOLENT, TOWARDS THE OTHER RESIDENTS. ON A REFUGEE METER, I WOULD 

 GIVE HER A ZERO. APPARENTLY, THIS WOMAN, HAS NEVER HEARD OF THE                 SAYING, THAT LOOSE LIPS, SINK SHIPS. HEARING, ABOUT HER STORY, I DO 

 BELIEVED, THAT SHE HAS MET, THE RUSSIANS IN TURKEY, AS SHE CLAIMED.

 THE RUSSIAN MAFIA, PERHAPS, WHO ARE TOUGH AND VIOLENT. 

         

SHELTER BEDS, AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, IS NOT EASY TO COME BY, 

FOR THE GENERAL COMMUNITY. ON ANY GIVEN DAY, OR NIGHT, HUNDRED OF HOMELESS CANADIANS, ARE CALLING THAT SHELTER FOR A BED, TO BE TURNED AWAY, DAILY AND BEING TOLD THAT THERE, WERE NO BEDS AVAILABLE. BUT THAT WAS NOT THE TRUTH. THERE WERE BEDS AVAILABLE, BUT THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO ACCESSED THOSE BEDS, BECAUSE OF THE POLICY OF THE SHELTER, TO RESERVED THOSE BEDS, FOR THE REFUGEES, MENTIONED, AT THAT PARTICULAR SHELTER. THIS HAPPENS AT NO OTHER SHELTER. WHERE THE RATE OF THE REFUGEE CLAIMANTS AND THE REGULAR HOMELESS CANADIANS, ARE ABOUT THE SAME. NOT SO AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, THE SITUATION IS REVERSED, WHER THE SO CALLED REFUGEES, WERE LET INTO THE SHELTER AND THE REGULAR HOMELESS CANADIANS, WERE LEFT TO SLEEP ON THE STREET. 

* ONE OF THE FIRST RED FLAG, IS THAT THOSE REFUGEES, FROM THE THREE COUNTRIES MENTIONED, ARE ALSO "GUARANTEED A BED", AT THE SHELTER. THIS WAS MADE CLEAR, (IF YOU DO THE MATH, ALSO), AT THE RATE, AT WHICH THEY WERE, ADMITTED AT THE SHELTER. THEY HAD A 90% CHANCE OR MORE, OF GETTING INTO THE SHELTER, ABOVE, THE REGULAR CANADIAN, WHO WERE ALSO WAITING, TO GET INTO THE SAME SHELTER, BUT HAD LESS THAN A TEN % CHANCE, OF GETTING IN.  SINCE THEY ARE TAKING A CHANCE, AND CALLING INTO THE SHELTER AND NOT GETTING IN, AND THE SOCALLED REFUGEES, ARE ALSO CALLING THE SHELTER AND GETTING IN, THEN THIS COULD ONLY MEAN ONE THING. THAT THE REFUGEES, GETTING INTO THE SAME SHELTER, MUST HAVE BEEN DONE, FROM THE "INSIDE". THE DECISION, WAS MADE FROM THE "INSIDE", I.E, FROM THE SHELTER STAFF AND MANAGEMENT, OR FROM A SINGLE PERSON, IN A POSITION TO DO SO, WHERE THOSE "REFUGEES", WERE GUARANTEED A BED, AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER.

WHERE THE FINGER OF BLAME, IS BEING POINTED. AND NOT BY ONE PERSON, BUT BY MANY.  THE GENERAL CONSENSUS, IS THAT, THIS WOMAN, NANCY NGANGA, IS TO BE BLAMED, FOR THE INFLUX, OF KENYAN "REFUGEES", ESPECIALLY, AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, IN MISSISSAUGA, PEEL REGION. THE RESIDENTS, HAVE SEEN BEDS, THAT WERE EMPTY, ONLY TO BE SET ASIDE, FOR THOSE KENYAN, UGANDAN AND NIGERIAN, "REFUGEES", AT THE SHELTER.

YES, BLAME "MAMA" NANCY NGANGA. THE KENYAN BORN, SUPERVISOR, AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, WHOSE LOYALTY, TO HER COUNTRYMEN, OUTWEIGHS, HER DUTY, TO THE OTHER RESIDENTS. 

AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, DURING THE CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS, WHEN A CHURCH GROUP, HAD ALSO VOLUNTEERED, AT THE SHELTER, MAKING A CHRISTMAS DINNER, FOR THE RESIDENTS AND SINGING CHRISTMAS CAROLS, FOR THE RESIDENTS, NANCY NGANGA, THE SUPERVISOR, APPEARED IN THE DINING ROOM AND MADE AN ANOUNCEMENT.  THAT NO PICTURES OR VIDEOS, WAS TO BE TAKEN, OF THE RESIDENTS. ( WHERE A LOT OF THE REFUGEE CLAIMANTS, WERE, ALSO). SO THE KIND VOLUNTEERS, WERE NOT ABLE TO TAKE, ANY GROUP PICTURES, WITH ANYONE, AT THE SHELTER. THANKS TO NANCY.

SOME HAVE EVEN ASKED, THE QUESTION, IF SHE WAS ALSO, AIDING AND ABETTING?. (WHICH MEANS, BASICALLY, TO AID SOMEONE, IN BREAKING, THE LAW). IN OTHER WORDS, UNTRUTHFUL REFUGEE CLAIMANTS, AT THE SHELTER, WHO HAVE BEEN ASSISTED BY HER, IN VARIOUS WAYS, INCLUDING, WITH LONGER STAYS, AT THE SHELTER, OR IN OTHER WAYS, (IT IS HARD TO BELIEVED, THAT SHE DID NOT NOTICED, THE VAST DISPARITY, IN THE NUMBER OF REFUGEES, TO OTHER REGULAR, HOMELESS RESIDENTS, AT THE SHELTER. AND THAT THE REFUGEES, FROM HER FORMER COUNTRY AND THE OTHER TWO COUNTRIES, MENTIONED, WERE THE MAJORITY, AT THE SHELTER. THAT THEY HAD OVERCROWED, THE SHELTER, IN NUMBERS.  WHERE MORE THAN TWO THIRDS, OF THE RESIDENTS, WERE SO CALLED REFUGEES). 

AND THAT MANY OF THEM, WERE ALSO BREAKING THE LAW, REGARDING, THEIR FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS, AND REFUGEE CLAIMS. IN FACT, HER ACTIONS, ARE SUSPICIOUS, TO SAY THE VERY LEAST. CERTAINLY, THERE SHOULD BE, AN INVESTIGATION, OR SEVERAL OF THEM, AS TO WHY, SHE WAS ALSO BLINDED, TO THIS FACT. WHEN THE NUMBER OF "REFUGEES", AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, MORE THAN DOUBLED, THE NUMBER OF THOSE, OTHER REFUGEES, IN OTHER SHELTERS, WHICH ARE ALSO VASTLY, MORE DIVERSIFIED, AND NOT JUST INVOLVING, ONLY THREE KINDS OF PEOPLE, BUT MORE INCLUSIVE.  ONE OF THE "REFUGEES", WAS HEARD SAYING, THAT, SHE DID NOT MIND, GOING BACK TO KENYA. AND ALSO BRAGGED, THAT SHE HAD A HOUSE IN KENYA. (I ALSO DOUBTED, IF SHE WAS STAYING, AT ONE OF THE REFUGEE CAMPS, IN KENYA). IN OTHER WORDS, SHE WAS EMPHASIZING, THAT HER LIFE WAS BETTER, IN KENYA AND HATED BEING IN THE SHELTER. WHICH SHE ALSO LOOKED DOWN UPON.  ALTHOUGH, IT WAS ALSO NECESSARY, TO BE LIVING, AT THE SHELTER, FOR HER REFUGEE CLAIM. SO THE LOGICAL QUESTION, TO BE ASKED THEN IS, WHY WOULD A LEGITIMATE, REFUGEE, WANT TO GO BACK TO A COUNTRY, THAT SHE HAD LEFT, BECAUSE OF PERSECUTION?. OR THAT IT WAS UNSAFE FOR HER?. MANY, IF NOT ALL, OF THESE "REFUGEES", AT THE SHELTER, HAD CHILDREN, WHO WERE LEFT BEHIND, IN THOSE COUNTRIES. 

AND THOSE CHILDREN, WERE ALSO HAPPY AND WELL TAKEN CARE OF, AS WELL. (I AM SAYING THIS, BASED ON PROOF. NOT SPECULATIONS). MEANING, THAT I ALSO, HAVE INFORMATION, THAT I HAVE ALSO NOT SHARED, PUBLICLY, REGARDING, THOSE PERSONS. THEY ONLY MISSED, THEIR LYING PARENTS, (MOST OF THEM, ARE NOT TELLING THE TRUTH, ABOUT THEIR, REFUGEE CLAIMS),WHO HAD SOUGHT A BETTER LIFE, IN CANADA, "THROUGH THE BACK DOOR", SO TO SPEAK.

SO WAS SHE INVOLVED, FOR PERSONAL REASONS, IN ASSISTING, PERSONS, IN SOME OF THEIR FALSE, REFUGEE CLAIMS, IN CANADA?. TO, ALLEGEDLY, KNOWINGLY, ASSISTED, THOSE WHO MAY HAVE BEEN, BREAKING THE LAW?. THAT WOUDL ALSO BE, "AIDING AND ABETTING", THOSE PERSONS, TO BREAK THE LAW. AT THE VERY LEAST, SHE WAS USING THE SHELTER, TO PROVIDE BEDS AND A SEMI PERMANENT HOME, FOR THE REFUGEES, WHILE OTHER CANADIANS, COULD NOT GET INTO THE SHELTER. I WILL MENTION, AN ALLEGED, INCIDENT, THAT STANDS OUT.  ALLEGEDLY, AN INCIDENT, AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER,  LAST WEEK, INVOLVING, A "REFUGEE" WOMAN, AT THE SHELTER, ALLEGEDLY, WHO MAY HAVE BEEN CAUGHT, RED HANDED, INITIATING, ALLEGEDY, A BOGUS REFUGEE CLAIM. WHEN THE WOMAN REALIZED, THAT THE INFORMATION, AND ALSO HER ACTIONS, WERE EXPOSED, SHE WAS ALMOST IMMEDIATELY, SENT TO A HOTEL FOR REFUGEES, BY NANCY. FOR SOME REASON, NANCY THE SUPERVISOR, AT THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER, INEXPLICABLY, REMOVED THE WOMAN, TO ANOTHER LOCATION, ONLY DAYS, AFTER SHE HAD COME, TO THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTER AND WHERE THE INCIDENT, ALLEGEDLY, HAD OCCURED. SHE WAS SENT TO A HOTEL, THAT ALSO HOUSED, SOME OF THE FORMER REFUGEES, OF THE SHELTER. WHO HAD BEEN ASKED TO LEAVE, BECAUSE OF THEIR LENGHY STAYS, (THAT ALSO WENT FOR A LONG TIME, "UNNOTICED", BY THE REGION OF PEEL), AS WELL AS THE NEW ARRIVALS, SINCE THE SHELTER, NOW HAS AN OVERLOAD. RESIDENTS IN THE "KNOW", HAVE ASKED THE QUESTION, "WHY DID THE SUPERVISOR, NANCY, DO THAT?. WHY DID IT SEEM LIKE, SHE WAS ACTING TO PROTECT, THE WOMAN, BECAUSE SHE WAS FOUND OUT AND THAT THIS COULD, ALSO, HAVE COMPROMISED, HER SITUATION, AS A REFUGEE CLAIMANT?. WHEN I FIRST HEARD, OF THE SUPERVISOR'S, ALLEGED, ACTIONS, I BECAME SUSPICIOUS, AS TO WHY SHE WANTED, TO SEND "THAT REFUGEE", (AND THAT IS NOT THE ONLY ONE, THAT SHE ALSO PROTECTED), TO ANOTHER LOCATION, WHEN SO MANY OTHER REFUGEES, ALSO REMAINED, AT THE SHELTER. IT WAS CLEAR, THAT SHE WAS ALSO, PROTECTING HER.  AND THE REASONS, ALSO REMAINED UNCLEAR, AT THIS TIME. BUT SOME OF THE RESIDENTS, OF THE SHELTER, ALSO BELIEVED, THAT IT WAS TO PROTECT THE WOMAN, FROM BEING, INVESTIGATED, REGARDING, HER REFUGEE CLAIM, WHEN "OTHER INFORMATION" ABOUT HER CLAIM, ALSO CAME TO LIGHT. WAS SHE ALSO, "HELPING", THE WOMAN, TO EVADE BEING, INVESTIGATED, FOR HER ACTIONS, OVER HER REFUGEE STATUS, IN CANADA?. WHICH WOULD ALSO BE, "AN ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT", OFFENCE, IN CANADA. LOOK IT UP. THERE MUST HAVE BEEN HUNDREDS, OF THESE "REFUGEES", PASSING THROUGH THE CAWTHRA ROAD SHELTERS, BOTH RECENTLY, AND YEARS BACK.  THERE IS A LAW, CURRENTLY, THAT IF SOMEONE GAINS THEIR REFUGEE STATUS, UNDER FRAUDULENT MEANS, SUCH AS BY LYING, ON THEIR APPLICATION, THAT THEIR REFUGEE STATUS, WOULD BE REVERSED. IN OTHER WORDS, TAKEN AWAY.  THE LEGISLATION IN QUESTION, IS BILL- C 31. 

I HAVE GENUINE EMPHATHY, FOR THOSE WHO HAVE SUFFERED. I AM NOT AGAINST GENUINE REFUGEES. FACING PERSECUTION, ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS, OR AS A GROUP, SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN, ADVANTAGE OF, BY THOSE WHO SEE IT, AS A MEANS OF FURTHERING, THEIR OWN CAUSE. TO ME, THEY ARE PREVENTING, THE REAL REFUGEES, FROM HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY, THAT THEY HAVE NOW TAKEN AWAY, THROUGH THEIR ABUSE OF THE SYSTEM. 

THE RED FLAG SHOULD GO UP, WHEN THERE ARE TOO MANY, OF THE SAME PEOPLE, TELLING THE SAME STORY, WITHIN A NARROW OR SMALL RADIUS. WHEN THE STORIES ARE ALMOST IDENTICAL AND COMING FROM THE SAME PLACE. WHEN THERE IS NO LATTITUDE, BECAUSE ALL ARE FAMILIAR, WITH THE SAME STORY, THAT THEY ARE  TELLING, OR PERPETRATING.  AS IF THEY ARE ALL LIVING, IN ONE BIG HOME AND ALL ARE EXPERIENCING, THE EXACT SAME THING. OR, SINCE IT IS A PLOY, THEY HAVE ALL LEARNED, THE BASICS, OF THE EXTENT OF THEIR PLOTS. AND CENTRAL TO THE PLOT, IS THE REFUGEE APPLICATION. SO WHEN IT WORKS FOR ONE, IT ALSO WORKS FOR ALL OF THEM, BECAUSE IN THIS GAME, THERE IS A CENTRAL THEME, (FOR THEM). AND THEY ALL FOLLOW THE SAME COURSE. THE SAME SCRIPT. NONE OF THEIR SITUATIONS, ARE UNIQUE. WHY SHOULD IT BE, OTHERS HAVE DONE IT BEFORE AND IT IS ALSO A SAFELY GUARDED SECRET, ONLY KNOWN TO THE ONES, WHO ARE CARRYING IT OUT.  UNTIL THEY ARE EXPOSED.