AFTER FILING MY URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, I WAS TOLD THAT IT WENT DIRECTLY, TO THE CIVIL URGENT MOTIONS, INTAKE, AND TO THE MANAGER, ROXANNE PARIS, WHO WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT A JUDGE, HEARD THE URGENT MOTION, TODAY. WHAT THEY DID, WAS TO ACT IN A CONSPIRACY, TO DELAY THE URGENT MOTION, IN ORDER TO CAUSE ME HARM.
THE STAFF INVOLVED, WERE, ROXANNE PARIS, MANAGER, OF CIVIL-INTAKE URGENT MOTIONS, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, SANCHA CLARKE, MANAGER OF THE CIVIL INTAKE, A SUPERVISOR NAME DIANNE AND UZA, ANOTHER SUPERVISOR, IN THE COURT.
THE MESSAGES, THAT I HAD RECEIVED, ABOUT THE STATUS, OF MY URGENT MOTION, WAS ALSO RELAYED TO ME, FROM UZA, DIRECTLY AND ALSO, FROM DIANNE, HER MANAGER. AFTER I HAD FILED THE URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, THEY HAD SENT IT DIRECTLY TO ROXANNE PARIS, TO PUT IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE. NOW IT HAS TURNED OUT, THAT ROXANNE PARIS, HAD DELIBERATELY DELAYED, MY URGENT MOTION, FROM BEING HEARD BY THE COURT, IN ORDER TO CAUSE ME HARM.
THE GOAL, OF THE COURT STAFF, WAS TO DELAY, MY URGENT MOTION, FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY, INJUNCTION, OR MANDATORY ORDER, IN THE COURT, IN ORDER TO CAUSE, ME HARM. WHICH THEY ALSO DID. (Since the whole purpose, of filing an urgent motion, is to prevent harm, from being done to the party, who has filed the urgent motion).
THE GOAL, OF THE COURT STAFF, WAS TO DELAY, MY URGENT MOTION, FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY, INJUNCTION, OR MANDATORY ORDER, IN THE COURT, IN ORDER TO CAUSE, ME HARM. WHICH THEY ALSO DID. (Since the whole purpose, of filing an urgent motion, is to prevent harm, from being done to the party, who has filed the urgent motion).
WHERE I WILL BE TAKING THIS MATTER, LEGALLY:
1. TO THE CRIMINAL COURT, FOR THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (IN INTERFERING, WITH THE ADMINISTRATION, OF JUSTICE. BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST, CORRUPTION AND CONSPIRACY, AGAINST, ROXANNE PARIS, ESPECIALLY.
2. TO THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL, AGAINST THE JUDGE, WHO HAD DELAYED, HEARING, THE URGENT MOTION, THAT WAS FILED, AT THE COURTHOUSE AND THEN WAS SENT DIRECTLY, TO THE URGENT MOTIONS, MANAGER, ROXANNE PARIS, BY THE COURT STAFF, TO BE GIVEN TO THE JUDGE,TO MAKE A DECISION ON THE URGENT MOTION, THAT WAS BEFORE HIM, ON THAT DAY. WHICH HE ALSO DELAYED.
3. TO FILE AN URGENT, PETITION, WITH THE INTER AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, FOR AN INTERVENTION, REGARDING, THE ABUSE OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.
4. TO FILE CHARGES, IN THE ITERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, AGAINST THE
CANADIAN JUDGES, AND OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, WHO HAS CARRIED
OUT, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND OTHER CRUEL AND UNUSAL TREATMENT
AGAINST ME.
5. OTHER LEGAL AVENUES, TO RECOVER DAMAGES, OR COMPENSATION, INCLUDING, THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, FOR TARGETING ME AND SUBJECTING ME TO RACISM.
WHY I WILL BE FILING, A COMPLAINT, WITH THE, CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL, AGAINST THE JUDGE (WHOSE NAME, THE COURT STAFF, SUCH AS ROXANNE PARIS, MANAGER, OF CIVIL URGENT MOTIONS, WILL ALSO NOT RELEASE TO ME), FOR DELAYING, HEARING, MY URGENT MOTION, AFTER IT WAS, ALLEGEDLY, PUT IN FRONT OF HIM. TO NOT ONLY DEAL, WITH DISREPUTABLE CONDUCT, OF THE JUDGE, BUT TO ALSO MAKE SURE, THAT HE WILL ALSO THINK TWICE, ABOUT DOING THIS TO SOMEONE ELSE.
AND THAT AFTER FILING, MY COMPLAINT, WITH THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL, I WILL ALSO TAKE MY GRIEVANCE, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COURT, AGAINST ALL OF THOSE, WHO WERE INVOLVED, IN VIOLATING, MY HUMAN RIGHTS, IN THIS MANNER.
THERE IS STILL A QUESTION, AS TO WHETHER MY URGENT MOTION, FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION, OR MANDATORY ORDER, EVEN WENT BEFORE A JUDGE, OR THAT IT WAS SIMPLY, DELAYED, IN ORDER TO CAUSED ME HARM, BY ROXANNE PARIS AND ALSO BY, SANCHA CLARKE, BOTH OF THEM, MANAGERS, IN THE CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN TORONTO.
EITHER THAT IS THE CASE, OR THE URGENT MOTION, ALSO NEVER WENT BEFORE ANY JUDGE, BECAUSE I WAS ALSO GIVEN THIS SCENARIO, BY THE COURT STAFF, UZA AND HER MANAGER, DIANNE. DIANNE TOLD ME, DIRECTLY, THAT MY URGENT MOTION, WAS "BEING REVIEWED, BY THE JUDGE". AT ANOTHER TIME, I WAS ALSO TOLD BY HER, THAT IT WAS BEING "REVIEWED BY A TEAM OF COURT STAFF", INCLUDING, ROXANNE PARIS, THE MANAGER, IN THE CIVIL URGENT MOTIONS OFFICE.
WHOEVER, WAS REVIEWING, MY URGENT MOTION, WAS ALSO, DELIBERATELY, TRYING TO CAUSE A DELAY, IN A DECISION, BEING MADE ON IT, AND THAT THIS ACTION WAS ALSO INTENDED, TO CAUSED ME HARM. THAT WAS THEIR GOAL, BUT THE JOKE IS ALSO ON THEM, WHEN I TAKE LEGAL ACTIONS, AGAINST THEM.
WHAT THEY DID, AND ESPECIALLY, ROXANNE PARIS, WAS NOT ONLY A CRIME, IN OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND INTERFERING, WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, IN MY CASE, BUT IT ALSO INTERFERED, WITH MY SO CALLED "GUARANTEED RIGHTS", UNDER THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION. WHICH YOU WILL SOON REALIZED, DO NOT EXIST, FOR SOME PEOPLE, LIKE ME.
