Thursday, May 16, 2024

THE UNBELIEVABLE, CORRUPTION, OF THIS ONTARIO, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, JEANNIE ANAND. JP, JEANNIE ANAND, TOOK THE CHARGES (PRIVATE INFORMATION), OUT OF THE COURTROOM (JP'S OFFICE) AND WENT SOMEWHERE ELSE, IN THE COURTHOUSE. WHERE DID SHE TAKE THOSE CHARGES TO?. THE CHARGES WERE AGAINST, SOME COURT OFFICIALS, IN THE SAME COURTHOUSE. YOU GUESS IT?. I BELIEVED, THAT SHE EITHER MADE THEM AWARE, OF THE CHARGES AGAINST THEM, OR SHE ALSO MADE CONTACT, WITH THE POLICE, IN THE SAME COURTHOUSE. WHO ALSO CONSPIRED, WITH THIS JP, ANAND, TO NOT PROCEED WITH THE CHARGES, I BELIEVED, AGAINST THOSE COURT STAFF. EITHER WAY, SHE CAME BACK INTO THE COURTROOM (JP'S OFFICEE), WITH A PRESUMPTION OF BIAS, AGAINST THE COMPLAINANT, (ME), AND NOT SURPRISINGLY, DENIED HER THE RIGHT, TO COMMENCED, A PRIVATE PROSECUTION, AGAINST THOSE COURT STAFF.

THE INTERNATIONAL, HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS, SERIOUSLY, UNDERESTIMATED, THE LEVEL OF CORRUPTION, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS, AMONG ITS JUDICIARY AND STAFF.

WHEN THE WHITE, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, JEANNIE ANAND, AT THE BRAMPTON COURTHOUSE, DENIED THE COMPLAINANT, A BLACK WOMAN, ME, THE RIGHT TO PROCEED, WITH CRIMINAL CHARGES, AGAINST SOME PUBLIC SERVANTS, WHO WORKED AT THE  A. GRANDVILLE COURTHOUSE, IN BRAMPTON ONTARIO, SHE 

HERE IS ANOTHER, INDISPUTABLE PROOF, OF HOW CORRUPT, THE CANADIAN JUDGES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE ARE, WHEN NO ONE IS WATCHING THEM, IN ACTION.

THE ABSOLUTE PROOF, OF THE CORRPTION, AND CONSPIRACY, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS, AGAINST ME, VALERIE GUILLAUME.  THIS TIME IT IS COMING FROM, THOSE JUDGES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, IN THE ONTARIO COURTS. AS WELL AS THE COURT'S STAFF.

 THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE THANKING ME, AS A BLOGGER, FOR THESE REPORTS, ON THE CORRUPTION, IN THE ONTARIO COURTS, THAT ARE BEING CARRIED OUT, BY THE JUDGES AND THE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.

LET'S SCRUTINIZED, WHITE RACISM, BY A WHITE FEMALE, JP, IN THE CANADIAN              JUDICAL SYSTEM.  YOU WILL QUICKLY LEARN, THAT THE AGENDA OF THE WHITE FEMALE, JUDGE, OR JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, IN THE COURT, IS THE SAME AS THE WHITE MALE. BOTH SECRETLY AND OPENLY, TARGETS BLACKS, IN THE COURTS.                                           

                                       JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, JEANNIE ANAND,

                                       SECRETLY AND OPENLY, TARGETS BLACKS

                                       AND ALSO CONSPIRED, AGAINST THIS BLOGGER,

                                      TO BLOCK HER EFFORTS, IN THE COURT. SHE IS A

                                       WHITE RACIST AND TARGETS, THIS BLACK WOMAN,

                                       FOR NO OTHER REASON, THAN THE RACISM, THAT

                                       SHE ALSO PROMOTES, IN THE CANADIAN COURT.

                                         THIS CAUCASIAN, BLOND HAIR AND BLUE EYED,

                                         CANADIAN, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, IS BELIEVED, 

                                         TO HAVE CONSPIRED, TO NOT PROCEED, WITH  THE

                                        CRIMINAL CHARGES, AGAINST THREE COURT STAFF

                                        AND PUBLIC SERVANTS, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA

                                       A SUPERVISOR, AT THE COURT AND RYAD ANDREWS,  

                                      THE MANAGER OF COURT OPERATIONS AND DEBBIE DUNN, 

                                       THE DIRECTOR OF COURT OPERATIONS, WHO HAS FACED 

                                     THE CHARGES, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND BREACH OF PUBLIC 

                                    TRUST, IN HER ONGOING FIGHT FOR HER HUMAN RIGHTS, IN THE 

                                   CANADIAN COURT. THE FIGHT GOES ON IN THE ICC, AGAINST THEM.


Justice of the Peace, Jeannie Anand, made a fatal mistake, when she took the private charges, or information, outside of the JP's office, (as seen by the complainant, who said nothing to her about it), to somewhere else in the courthouse and then came back with them and then proceeded to try to get more information, out of the complainant, than she needed to. She also basically "tried" the case, without it ever being at a trial. She wanted more evidence, she said, rather than taking the information, with the evidence that was in the written testimony, of the complainant, which she also went into details about, in the private information. She i.e. JP, Jeannie Anand, also made sure to make it known that the hearing, (interview in the JP's office) was also being recorded, audibly, and that she now wanted a full statement, with full evidence, from the complainant, before she would even consider, accepting the charges, against the court staff, who are located at the Brampton courthouse, in Brampton, Ontario, Canada. I believed this justice of the peace, Jeannie Anand, came back into the JP's office, fully prepared, to not accept the private information (criminal charges), from the complainant. It should also be a MAJOR concern, that she also took the private information documents, (three of them), outside of the Justice of the Peace Office, and that after sometime, came back into the JP's Office, with those same charges, (private information), as if she went to show it to others, who were also interested, in those charges against the court's staff, not proceeding, in the court. And on her way back into the JP's office, she also stopped to speak with the complainant, who was sitting in the reception area, with two other persons, who were also there to see the justice of the peace, with their own concerns. And by the way, they both got what they had gone to the JP's office about, from the same justice of the peace, Jeannie Anand, who also denied the same service, to the complainant and refused to accept her private information (charges), against those three court staff, Christine Davies Oliveira, Ryad Andrews and Debbie Dunn. BUT DID I NOT TELL YOU, THE PUBLIC, THAT THIS WOULD ALSO HAPPENED, IN MY LAST VIDEO?. THAT I WOULD TRY TO LAY THE CHARGES, BUT THAT THEY WERE ALSO GOING TO TRY AND BLOCKED, THOSE CHARGES, AGAINST THOSE COURT STAFF, WHO HAD PERSONALLY, INTERFERED, IN THE COMPLAINANT'S MATTERS, BEFORE THE COURT, CAUSING A DELAY AND THEREBY DENYING HER THE JUSTICE, THAT SHE WAS ALSO ENTITLED TO HAVE, REGARDING HER CASE?.
YOU WOULD THINK THAT AFTER ALL OF THESE YEARS OF REPORTING ON THEIR ACTIONS, THAT THEY WOULD BE SMART ENOUGH, TO TRY TO AVOID, EXPOSING THEIR CORRUPTION, IN MY FACE, KNOWING FULL WELL, THAT I WOULD ALSO EXPOSED THEM, TO THE PUBLIC. INDEED, TO THE REST OF THE WORLD.  TO CORRECT THE LIE, THAT IS BEING TOLD, BY THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, CONCERNING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN THAT COUNTRY.  BUT NO, THEY CONTINUED TO ACT, CORRUPT, EVERY CHANCE THEY GET. SO I THINK THAT CANADIAN JUDGES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, ARE NOT THAT BRIGHT. THEY ARE NOT SMART, BECAUSE THEY DON'T COVER THEIR ACTIONS, THAT WELL. I THINK IT IS BECAUSE, THEY REALLY WANT OTHERS, TO KNOW WHO THEY REALLY ARE AND ALSO INDIRECTLY, GOES ABOUT REVEALING, THEMSELVES, TO THE PUBLIC AND THE REST OF THE WORLD. IT'S A MOCKING GAME.

WHEN COMPARED, TO THEIR COUNTERPARTS, IN OTHER COUNTRIES. A BIG PART OF THE CORRUPTION, LIES IN THE FACT, THAT CANADIAN COURTS, DO NOT ALLOW ANY FORM OF RECORDING, OF ITS HEARINGS. TALK ABOUT A LACK OF TRANSPARENCY. THAT ALONE, SHOULD HAVE BEEN A RED FLAG, THAT THERE IS A LOT MORE GOING ON, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS, THAN THE PUBLIC IS LED TO BELIEVED. TO GET RID OF CORRUPTION, THE CANADIAN COURTS, NEED TO ALLOW ITS HEARINGS TO BE VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDED, BY THE PUBLIC, AND NOT JUST BY THE COURT ITSELF. WHICH HAS ALSO BEEN KNOWN IN THE PAST, TO DELETE EVIDENCE, FROM TRANSCRIPTS, THAT WOULD ALSO SHOW THE JUDGE IN AN UNFLATTERING MANNER. 

The Decline of Democracy and the Rule of Law...

Nov 9, 2017 — We are fortunate in Canada that our courts are not corrupt and dispense independent, impartial justice. But justice delayed is justice ...

AS LONG AS THIS LIE, IS BEING PERPETRATED IN CANADA, HERE, BY ITS HIGHEST COURT, THERE WILL CONTINUE TO BE CORRUPTION, IN THE CANADIAN COURT AND ABUSE OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, OF THE PEOPLE. 

Still don't believe, that Canada's judicial system is corrupt?. Then click on the link and read more about, its corrupt judges and justices of peace:

Some facts you probably didn't know -- Canadian judicial appointments are among the most corrupt in the entire world. That's the opinion of the human rights ...

 

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

SHOCKING!!!. WHITE RACISTS, EXPOSED. DEBBIE DUNN, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIER...


DEALING WITH WHITE RACISTS, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. THESE PUBLIC SERVANTS, HAVE USED THEIR POSITIONS, TO BLOCK MY CASE, B
EFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. THEY ARE: CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, RYAD DUNN, MANAGER OF COURT OPERATIONS, WHO KEPT SILENT, WHEN HE BECAME AWARE OF CHRISTINE'S ACTIONS AND DEBBIE DUNN, WHO ALSO, AS THE DIRECTOR, KEPT SILENT AND IN AGREEMENT, WITH THE VIOLATION OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

MY MOTION THAT I FILED, TO SET ASIDE THE DECISION, OF THE JUDGE
LEONARD RICCHETTI, THAT HE MADE ON APRIL 30TH, AGAINST ME, AND 
IN FAVOUR OF THE RESPONDENT, SHIP, WHOSE COUNSEL, THE SAID JUDGE
HAD, AN OUT OF COURT HEARING WITH, WITHOUT MY CONSENT, OR THAT I WAS PRIVY TO, AND THEREBY TAINTING, THE VERY HEARING, WITH HIS OBVIOUS LACK OF PRECEDURAL FAIRNESS AND OTHER ISSUES, WITH HIS ORDER. 

NOW ONE WEEK LATER, MY MOTION TO SET ASIDE OR VARY, HIS ORDER, THAT I SENT TO THE SCJ, BRAMPTON REGION, TO BE FILED, HAS BEEN DENIED BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVERIA, WITH THE BACKING, OF RYAD ANDREWS AND DEBBIE DUNN, WHO HAVE KEPT SILENT, ABOUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED, IN MY CASE.

THIS WOMAN, HAS NOT EVEN KNOW, IN WHAT AREA I HAD FAILED, IN HER EYES, TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW, CONCERNING MY MOTION TO SET ASIDE.  AND HER REASON, FOR NOT BRINGING FORWARD THAT MOTION TO SET ASIDE, TO BE HEARD BY THE COURT, ON MAY 9TH. 

ANYONE WHO SAYS THAT CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, THE SUPERVISOR IN THE MOTIONS DIVISION, OF THE COURT, WHO WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE REASONS, HAS SIMPLY BLOCKED MY MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGE ORDER, FROM PROCEEDING IN THE COURT, WITH HER RIDCULOUS STATEMENTS, DOESN'T DESERVED TO BE CHARGED WITH OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST, IS WICKED AS SHE IS.

ALL THREE PERSONS, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, RYAD ANDREWS, HER BOSS AND DEBBIE DUNN, THE DIRECTOR, OVER ALL OF THEM, DESERVES, TO BE CHARGED, WITH BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUS, CONSPIRACY, CORRUPTION, OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND OTHER CHARGES. 

AND THAT IS EXACTLY, WHAT THIS SITUATION, CALLS FOR AND NOTHING LESS.




Tuesday, May 7, 2024

UNBELIEVABLE!!!!. THE SHOCKING PROOF, OF THE CORRUPTION, OF CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, SUPERVISOR, RYAD ANDREWS, MANAGER, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, BRAMPTON COURTHOUSE AND DEBBIE DUNN, DIRECTOR, OF COURT OPERATIONS. ALL OF THEM, TO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST AND CONSPIRACY.

THE GROSS VIOLATION, OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AT THE BRAMPTION, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, BY THE DIRECTOR OF COURT OPERATIONS, DEBBIE DUNN, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA AND RYAD ANDREWS, AND THE JUDGES, ALSO, IN THAT COURT.THIS IS BEYOND, SYSTEMATIC RACISM, AND HAS NOW ADVANCED, TO THE PERSONAL ATTACK, AGAINST ME, THAT IS CARRIED OUT, BY THE COURT STAFF AND THE JUDGES OF THE COURT, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, BRAMPTON REGION.

THE ABSOLUTE PROOF, OF THE PERSONAL, INTERFERENCE, BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEREIA, AND OTHERS IN THE COURT, IN BLOCKING MY CASE, BEFORE THE COURT.  

THIS ALONE, IS SUFFICIENT PROOF, TO TAKE THOSE CORRUPT, CANADIANS, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, WHICH IS EXACTLY, WHAT I AM DOING, CURRENTLY. 

EXPOSING, CANADA'S DISGUSTING, SYSTEMATIC RACISM, IN THE COURTS. 

Some facts you probably didn't know -- Canadian judicial appointments are among the most corrupt in the entire world. That's the opinion of the human rights watchdog group Global Integrity. Official Canadian mythology dictates this secrecy equals independence.

Jun 1, 2017 — ... justice, such as corruption and disobedience, misleading justice, impersonating a peace officer and perjury, among others.326 Donald.

HERE IS ONE EXAMPLE, OF DELAYING JUSTICE, IN THE PERSONAL ATTACK, AGAINST ME, BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, SUPERVISOR, AT THE A. GRANDVILLE AND WILLIAM DAVIES  COURTHOUSE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA. MY CIVIL MATTER, AGAINST SHIP, SERVICES AND HOUSING IN THE PROVINCE, HAS BEEN BLOCKED IN THAT COURT, BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA  AND THE CONSPIRACY,
INVOLVED, RYAD ANDREWS, WHOSE SILENCE ON THE ISSUE, AS MANAGER OF COURT OPERATIONS, SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.  THE SAME FOR DEBBIE DUNN, THE DIRECTOR, OF COURT OPERATIONS, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO.
CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, SUPERVISOR AT THE,  A. GRANDVILLE AND WILLIAM DAVIS COURTHOUSE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA. HAS PERSONALLY, INTERFERED IN, MY CASE BEFORE THE COURT. 

THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!!!. THE CORRUPTION, OF CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEREIRA, SUPERVISOR, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON AND DEBBIE DUNN, DIRECTOR, OF COURT OPERATIONS, AND RYAD ANDREWS, MANAGER, OF COURT OPERATIONS. WITH THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE, FROM THE LATTER TWO, INSTEAD OF INVESTIGATING, THE ACTIONS OF THE SUPEVISOR, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA.

WHAT CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, HAS DONE TO MY CASE, SO FAR.  AND WHY SHE WILL BE CHARGED, FOR OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, IN MY CASE. 

THE KIND OF MOTION, THAT I HAVE, RECENTLY, FILED (THAT CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, HAS ALSO ATTEMPTED TO BLOCK) IN THE COURT,  WAS A MOTION, TO SET ASIDE OR VARY AN ORDER, AND IS NOT THE KIND OF MOTION, THAT SHOULD BE DELAYED.  IN FACT, IT IS TO BE FILED, FORTHWITH, ACCORDING, TO THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. YET, IT MAY NEVER BE HEARD, BY A JUDGE, ANYTIME SOON, IF THE CURRENT ACTIONS, OF CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, RYAD ANDREWS AND DEBBI DUNN, HAVE THEIR WAY, IN BLOCKING IT, SINCE THE LATTER TWO  PERSONS, HAVE DONE NOTHING, AGAINST THE ACTIONS, OF CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, THE SUPERVISOR, AT THE COURT. 

1. CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, HAS BLOCKED AND CONTINUES, TO BLOCK, MY CASE, BEFORE THE COURT. CAUSING A DELAY, IN MY MATTER, BEFORE THE COURT, THAT HAS ALREADY CAUSED ME HARM AND WILL ALSO CAUSED ME IRREPARABLE HARM, WITH HER LATEST ACTIONS TODAY, IN HER EMAIL, TELLING ME, THAT SHE WILL NOT PROCEED, WITH FILING MY MATTER, BEFORE TEHE COURT.  AND ALSO IGNORING, MY REQEST, TO EXPLAIN HER ACTIONS FURTHER.

2. SHE HAS PREVIOUSLYBLOCKED, MY  MOTION, THAT WAS SITTING ON HER DESK, FOR MORE THAN A WEEK,  (A MOTION TO TRANSFER A FILE, TO THE BRAMPTON COURT) INSTEAD, OF SENDING IT, TO BE SCHEDULED, FOR A HEARING. THAT HEARING DATE, HAD TO BE VACATED, BECAUSE OF HER ACTIONS. 

3. SHE HAS ALSO BEEN, OPENLY HOSTILE, TOWARDS ME. OFTEN CUTTING ME OFF, IN MID SENTENCE AND THEN WALKING AWAY, LEAVING THE ISSUE UNRESOLVED. INVOLVING, JUST A SIMPLE CASE OF FILING, A DOCUMENT IN THE COURT.

3. SHE IS CORRUPT AND SHOULD NOT REPRESENT, THE PUBLIC INTEREST, IN THE COURT. 

4. SHE IS RUDE AND OBNOXIOUS AND ALLOWS THE STAFF, TO TREAT THE PUBLIC, THE SAME WAY. 

FILING A MOTION : THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN, A SIMPLE ENOUGH PROCESS.  AND CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG, BUT FILING A MOTION, BASICALLY, FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. AND THOSE RULES ARE TO BE FOUND, IN THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. MAINLY. 

THIS IS WHAT I HAVE DONE, REGARDING THE CURRENT MOTION, FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF AND TO SET ASIDE OR VARY, THE ORDER OF THE SENIOR REGIONAL JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, REGARDING MY CIVIL MATTER, IN THAT COURT. HIS ORDER WAS MADE ON APRIL 30, 2024.  SO IT WAS EXTREMELY RELEVANT, FOR MY MATTER, NOT TO BE DELAYED, BY THE COURT, ON A MOTION TO SET ASIDE OR VARY AN ORDER. BUT THIS HAS BEEN THE CASE, BECAUSE OF THE ATTACK, AGAINST ME, IN THE COURT.

I HAVE EVEN BEEN THREATENED, WITH CHARGES, IF I CONTINUE TO CONTACT THE COURT, ABOUT THE FILING OF MY DOCUMENTS, IN THE BRAMPTON COURT. (NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND, WHY I NEED TO PROCEED, WITH MY MATTER, BEFORE THE ICC?). AS A SELF REPRESENTED PERSON, HOW CAN I NOT AVOID, CONTACTING, THE COURT'S ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, ABOUT THE FILING OF MY LEGAL DOCUMENTS, BEFORE THE COURT?. 

I HAVE FILED: 

1. THE MOTION RECORD, WHICH ALSO INCLUDED, THE MOTION, TO SET ASIDE OR VARY AN ORDER, AND A DOZEN OTHER DOCUMENTS, THAT WAS RELEVANT, TO THE MOTION TO SET ASIDE.

2. THE FACTUM

3. THE AFFIDAVIT, IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION

4. THE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE, COMMISSIONED, BY THE CLERK AT THE COURT, AS PROOF OF SERVICE, ON THE RESPONDENT.

AND AFTER FILING, ALL OF THOSE DOCUMENTS, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, BRAMPTON COURT, I STILL GOT AN EMAIL (THE SECOND ONE, CONCERNING, THE SAID FILING AND BASICALLY, SAYING THE SAME THING), FROM CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, THAT SHE WILL NOT ACCEPT MY DOCUMENTS FOR FILING. SEE HER EMAILS POSTED BELOW.

AND FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE FILED, LITERALY, DOZENS OF MOTIONS, OVER THE YEARS AND IN VARIOUS COURTS. EVEN PRESENTLY, I HAVE FILED MOTIONS, IN A HIGHER COURT THAN THIS ONE, WHICH ALSO GETS ACCEPTED BY THE COURT. (THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO), YET THE MOTION TO SET ASIDE OR VARY THE ORDER OF THIS CORRUPT JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, IS BEING BLOCKED, BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA AND THE REST OF THE COURT AND THEY BELIEVED, THAT THEY SHOULD ALSO CONTINUE TO BLOCK MY EFFORTS IN THE COURT AND TO VIOLATE MY RIGHTS. NOT ON MY WATCH.


 









Friday, May 3, 2024

THERE IS CORRUPTION, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO. THE CONSPIRACY, INVOLVING, THE ADMINSITRATIVE STAFF, AND THE SUPERVISOR, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, TRING TO BLOCK MY CASE, IN THE COURT. AND HOW THIS WILL PLAY OUT, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

THE BRAMPTON, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IS DOING THINGS, TO PREVENT, THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, REGARDING MY MATTERS. AND NOT JUST THE ADMIN. STAFF, BUT SOME OF THE JUDGES, AS WELL. 

THE MOTIVE, BEHIND THE ACTIONS, OF THE COURT STAFF, IS TO TRY TO END A LITIGATION, BEFORE IT IS ACTUALLY, FINISHED, IN THE COURT.  AND TO AID THE RESPONDENT'S LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVEY, IN ACHIEVING THIS GOAL.

SORRY, BUT IT WON'T HAPPEN.

IN MY PERSONAL OPINION, THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, DO NOT HAVE TO PUT UP ANY FIGHT, AGAINST ME, SINCE SHE HAS THE STAFF AT THE COURT, DOING THIS FOR HER.

THEY REALLY THINK THAT I AM STUPID?. 

AND LOOK WHERE IT IS GOING TO LAND THEM?  IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, SINCE I CANNOT GET ANY JUSTICE, IN ANY CANADIAN COURT. 

WHAT SHOULD THE PUBLIC, BELIEVED, WHEN A JUDGE, ARANGED TO MEET WITH THE OPPOSING COUNSEL, BEFORE THE HEARING?. AND NO, THIS IS NOT ALLOWED, UNDER THE LAW. HENCE, THE EXPOSURE, ON MY BLOG, OF THE JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, IN HIS ENDORSEMENT, DATED, APRIL 23, 2024, (I have posted his endorsement here, for the public to see, that I am not making this up). WHERE HE REQUESTED, TO HAVE CONTACT, WITH THE COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT, WHO IN THIS CASE, WAS THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, AND HOW THIS HAD ALSO IMPACTED, NEGATIVELY, REGARDING, MY HEARING.  HENCE MY MOTION, TO SET ASIDE HIS DECISION AND THE ORDER MADE, FOLLOWING THAT HEARING, ON APRIL 26, THAT WAS ALSO DECIDEDLY BIAS, AGAINST ME.

Senior Regional Judge
Leonard Ricchetti
Superior Court of Justice
Brampton, Ontario
Lawyer, Zohar Levy




SEE, FOR YOURSELF,  THE JUDGE'S ENDORSEMENT, ABOVE. THE SAID JUDGE ALSO REMINDED ME TODAY, ABOUT MEETINGS, OUTSIDE OF THE COURTROOM, (THE ADMIN. STAFF, HAD COMPLAINED TO HIM, THAT I WAS NOT ACCEPTING THEIR OPINIONS, (ACTUALLY, PERSONAL INTERFERENCE) ON THE FILING PROCESS). WHEN HE HIMSELF, HAS DONE IT. THERE IS NO REASON, TO BELIEVED, THAT HE DID NOT CONTACT COUNSEL, ZOHAR LEVY, AS HIS ENDORSEMENT, SAID HE WAS GOING TO DO. THE PROBLEM IS THAT, THIS WAS ALSO DONE, OUTSIDE OF THE COURTROOM, TO DISCUSSED, THE UPCOMING HEARING, WHERE ZOHAR AND I WAS TO ATTEND, BEFORE THE SAID JUDGE.  HE ALSO LATER DISMISSED MY MOTION, AGAINST ZOHAR'S CLIENT, SHIP, OR SERVICES AND HOUSING IN THE PROVINCE. HENCE, MY MOTION, TO SET HIS DECISION ASIDE. WHICH THE COURT STAFF, IS ALSO TRYING TO BLOCK. 


 I can tell you that it did not go well, with my hearing, with this judge, afterwards. He was now clearly bias against me, and this also showed in his decision).

AND EVER SINCE THE HEARING, THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, LED BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, THE SUPERVISOR, HAS BEEN BLOCKING MY EFFORTS, TO FILE MY MOTION, IN THE COURT, TO SET ASIDE THIS JUDGE'S DECISION. 

FOR THE RECORD, I ALSO CAME UP AGAINST, THIS KIND OF HINDERANCE, IN THE OTHER COURTS, AS WELL. BUT NOT WHERE THE JUDGE, HAD DISCUSSED THE CASE, WITH THE LAWYER, BEFORE THE HEARING. SO IT IS A CONSPIRACY, AND THE WHOLE ROTTEN BUNCH OF THEM, SHOULD ALSO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES, FOR WHAT THEY ARE DOING, BEHND CLOSED DOORS. NOT JUST BEING EXPOSED, BUT TO ALSO FACE, THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES, FOR DARING TO ABUSE, MY PROTETED RIGHTS.  

Moving forward, I then filed a motion to set aside his decision, only to find that the Supervisor, Christine Davies Oliveria and the rest of the administrative staff, have been doing their best, to block my effort, in filing my motion, to set aside the judge's decision. 

What did I do?. I filed my motion to set aside the decision of the judge, Ricchetti, and because it was less than seven days, before the hearing date, it had to be filed by email. Which now, the staff is blocking, from being filed. When filing online, on Case Lines, the litigant is specifically told, to file all documents, that has a hearing date, of seven days or less, by email. So why is the court staff, blocking me, and refusing to accept for filing, my motion to set aside, the decision of the single judge?. The motion was first sent to the court for filing, on May 1, 2024 and the rest of the documents, I tried to file by email today, only for Christine Davies Oliveira, to tell me, that she will not accept my documents for filing.  I know very well the reason why, so I will take the matter up on Monday, with the Ministry of the Attorney General. I had also previously, asked the Ministry to investigate, but I now have another reason, on top of the other concerns, about the Brampton court's staff, that needs to be looked into further.